Weighted Envy Freeness With Limited Subsidies

We explore solutions for fairly allocating indivisible items among agents assigned weights representing their entitlements. Our fairness goal is weighted-envy-freeness (WEF), where each agent deems their allocated portion relative to their entitlement at least as favorable as any other's relati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Elmalem, Noga Klein, Gonen, Rica, Segal-Halevi, Erel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Elmalem, Noga Klein
Gonen, Rica
Segal-Halevi, Erel
description We explore solutions for fairly allocating indivisible items among agents assigned weights representing their entitlements. Our fairness goal is weighted-envy-freeness (WEF), where each agent deems their allocated portion relative to their entitlement at least as favorable as any other's relative to their own. In many cases, achieving WEF necessitates monetary transfers, which can be modeled as third-party subsidies. The goal is to attain WEF with bounded subsidies. Previous work in the unweighted setting of subsidies relied on basic characterizations of EF that fail in the weighted settings. This makes our new setting challenging and theoretically intriguing. We present polynomial-time algorithms that compute WEF-able allocations with an upper bound on the subsidy per agent in three distinct additive valuation scenarios: (1) general, (2) identical, and (3) binary. When all weights are equal, our bounds reduce to the bounds derived in the literature for the unweighted setting.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2411.12696
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2411_12696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2411_12696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2411_126963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjE01DM0MrM042TQDU_NTM8oSU1RcM0rq1RwK0pNzUstLlYIzyzJUPDJzM0ESQWXJhVnpmSmFvMwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgZ5N9cQZw9dsMHxBUWZuYlFlfEgC-LBFhgTVgEAjaYvfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Weighted Envy Freeness With Limited Subsidies</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Elmalem, Noga Klein ; Gonen, Rica ; Segal-Halevi, Erel</creator><creatorcontrib>Elmalem, Noga Klein ; Gonen, Rica ; Segal-Halevi, Erel</creatorcontrib><description>We explore solutions for fairly allocating indivisible items among agents assigned weights representing their entitlements. Our fairness goal is weighted-envy-freeness (WEF), where each agent deems their allocated portion relative to their entitlement at least as favorable as any other's relative to their own. In many cases, achieving WEF necessitates monetary transfers, which can be modeled as third-party subsidies. The goal is to attain WEF with bounded subsidies. Previous work in the unweighted setting of subsidies relied on basic characterizations of EF that fail in the weighted settings. This makes our new setting challenging and theoretically intriguing. We present polynomial-time algorithms that compute WEF-able allocations with an upper bound on the subsidy per agent in three distinct additive valuation scenarios: (1) general, (2) identical, and (3) binary. When all weights are equal, our bounds reduce to the bounds derived in the literature for the unweighted setting.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2411.12696</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory ; Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms</subject><creationdate>2024-11</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12696$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.12696$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elmalem, Noga Klein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonen, Rica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segal-Halevi, Erel</creatorcontrib><title>Weighted Envy Freeness With Limited Subsidies</title><description>We explore solutions for fairly allocating indivisible items among agents assigned weights representing their entitlements. Our fairness goal is weighted-envy-freeness (WEF), where each agent deems their allocated portion relative to their entitlement at least as favorable as any other's relative to their own. In many cases, achieving WEF necessitates monetary transfers, which can be modeled as third-party subsidies. The goal is to attain WEF with bounded subsidies. Previous work in the unweighted setting of subsidies relied on basic characterizations of EF that fail in the weighted settings. This makes our new setting challenging and theoretically intriguing. We present polynomial-time algorithms that compute WEF-able allocations with an upper bound on the subsidy per agent in three distinct additive valuation scenarios: (1) general, (2) identical, and (3) binary. When all weights are equal, our bounds reduce to the bounds derived in the literature for the unweighted setting.</description><subject>Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory</subject><subject>Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjE01DM0MrM042TQDU_NTM8oSU1RcM0rq1RwK0pNzUstLlYIzyzJUPDJzM0ESQWXJhVnpmSmFvMwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgZ5N9cQZw9dsMHxBUWZuYlFlfEgC-LBFhgTVgEAjaYvfg</recordid><startdate>20241119</startdate><enddate>20241119</enddate><creator>Elmalem, Noga Klein</creator><creator>Gonen, Rica</creator><creator>Segal-Halevi, Erel</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241119</creationdate><title>Weighted Envy Freeness With Limited Subsidies</title><author>Elmalem, Noga Klein ; Gonen, Rica ; Segal-Halevi, Erel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2411_126963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory</topic><topic>Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmalem, Noga Klein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonen, Rica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segal-Halevi, Erel</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmalem, Noga Klein</au><au>Gonen, Rica</au><au>Segal-Halevi, Erel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Weighted Envy Freeness With Limited Subsidies</atitle><date>2024-11-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>We explore solutions for fairly allocating indivisible items among agents assigned weights representing their entitlements. Our fairness goal is weighted-envy-freeness (WEF), where each agent deems their allocated portion relative to their entitlement at least as favorable as any other's relative to their own. In many cases, achieving WEF necessitates monetary transfers, which can be modeled as third-party subsidies. The goal is to attain WEF with bounded subsidies. Previous work in the unweighted setting of subsidies relied on basic characterizations of EF that fail in the weighted settings. This makes our new setting challenging and theoretically intriguing. We present polynomial-time algorithms that compute WEF-able allocations with an upper bound on the subsidy per agent in three distinct additive valuation scenarios: (1) general, (2) identical, and (3) binary. When all weights are equal, our bounds reduce to the bounds derived in the literature for the unweighted setting.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2411.12696</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2411.12696
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2411_12696
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory
Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms
title Weighted Envy Freeness With Limited Subsidies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A48%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Weighted%20Envy%20Freeness%20With%20Limited%20Subsidies&rft.au=Elmalem,%20Noga%20Klein&rft.date=2024-11-19&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2411.12696&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2411_12696%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true