Patching FPGAs: The Security Implications of Bitstream Modifications
Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are known for their reprogrammability that allows for post-manufacture circuitry changes. Nowadays, they are integral to a variety of systems including high-security applications such as aerospace and military systems. However, this reprogrammability also intro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2024-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Endres Puschner Ender, Maik Becker, Steffen Paar, Christof |
description | Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are known for their reprogrammability that allows for post-manufacture circuitry changes. Nowadays, they are integral to a variety of systems including high-security applications such as aerospace and military systems. However, this reprogrammability also introduces significant security challenges, as bitstream manipulation can directly alter hardware circuits. Malicious manipulations may lead to leakage of secret data and the implementation of hardware Trojans. In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework for manipulating bitstreams with minimal reverse engineering, thereby exposing the potential risks associated with inadequate bitstream protection. Our methodology does not require a complete understanding of proprietary bitstream formats or a fully reverse-engineered target design. Instead, it enables precise modifications by inserting pre-synthesized circuits into existing bitstreams. This novel approach is demonstrated through a semi-automated framework consisting of five steps: (1) partial bitstream reverse engineering, (2) designing the modification, (3) placing and (4) routing the modification into the existing circuit, and (5) merging of the modification with the original bitstream. We validate our framework through four practical case studies on the OpenTitan design synthesized for Xilinx 7-Series FPGAs. While current protections such as bitstream authentication and encryption often fall short, our work highlights and discusses the urgency of developing effective countermeasures. We recommend using FPGAs as trust anchors only when bitstream manipulation attacks can be reliably excluded. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2411.11060 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2411_11060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3130500991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-41d647a596f50bcb87403455ce3d4b8d3299269d6de8b79478dc56425af0cfd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0tLAzEYRYMgWGp_gCsDrmf88pyJu1ptLVQsOPshk2RsSudhMhX7762tru7iHi73IHRDIOW5EHCvw7f_SiknJCUEJFygEWWMJDmn9ApNYtwCAJUZFYKN0NNaD2bj2w88Xy-m8QEXG4ffndkHPxzwsul33ujBd23EXY0f_RCH4HSDXzvr6__qGl3Wehfd5C_HqJg_F7OXZPW2WM6mq0QLShJOrOSZFkrWAipT5RkHxoUwjlle5ZZRpahUVlqXV5niWW6NkJwKXYOprWRjdHuePSmWffCNDofyV7U8qR6JuzPRh-5z7-JQbrt9aI-fSkYYCAClCPsBy2lVRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3130500991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patching FPGAs: The Security Implications of Bitstream Modifications</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Endres Puschner ; Ender, Maik ; Becker, Steffen ; Paar, Christof</creator><creatorcontrib>Endres Puschner ; Ender, Maik ; Becker, Steffen ; Paar, Christof</creatorcontrib><description>Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are known for their reprogrammability that allows for post-manufacture circuitry changes. Nowadays, they are integral to a variety of systems including high-security applications such as aerospace and military systems. However, this reprogrammability also introduces significant security challenges, as bitstream manipulation can directly alter hardware circuits. Malicious manipulations may lead to leakage of secret data and the implementation of hardware Trojans. In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework for manipulating bitstreams with minimal reverse engineering, thereby exposing the potential risks associated with inadequate bitstream protection. Our methodology does not require a complete understanding of proprietary bitstream formats or a fully reverse-engineered target design. Instead, it enables precise modifications by inserting pre-synthesized circuits into existing bitstreams. This novel approach is demonstrated through a semi-automated framework consisting of five steps: (1) partial bitstream reverse engineering, (2) designing the modification, (3) placing and (4) routing the modification into the existing circuit, and (5) merging of the modification with the original bitstream. We validate our framework through four practical case studies on the OpenTitan design synthesized for Xilinx 7-Series FPGAs. While current protections such as bitstream authentication and encryption often fall short, our work highlights and discusses the urgency of developing effective countermeasures. We recommend using FPGAs as trust anchors only when bitstream manipulation attacks can be reliably excluded.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2411.11060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Circuit protection ; Computer Science - Cryptography and Security ; Countermeasures ; Field programmable gate arrays ; Hardware ; Military applications ; Reverse engineering ; Security ; Synthesis</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-11</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,784,885,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.11060$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3689939.3695779$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Endres Puschner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ender, Maik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paar, Christof</creatorcontrib><title>Patching FPGAs: The Security Implications of Bitstream Modifications</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are known for their reprogrammability that allows for post-manufacture circuitry changes. Nowadays, they are integral to a variety of systems including high-security applications such as aerospace and military systems. However, this reprogrammability also introduces significant security challenges, as bitstream manipulation can directly alter hardware circuits. Malicious manipulations may lead to leakage of secret data and the implementation of hardware Trojans. In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework for manipulating bitstreams with minimal reverse engineering, thereby exposing the potential risks associated with inadequate bitstream protection. Our methodology does not require a complete understanding of proprietary bitstream formats or a fully reverse-engineered target design. Instead, it enables precise modifications by inserting pre-synthesized circuits into existing bitstreams. This novel approach is demonstrated through a semi-automated framework consisting of five steps: (1) partial bitstream reverse engineering, (2) designing the modification, (3) placing and (4) routing the modification into the existing circuit, and (5) merging of the modification with the original bitstream. We validate our framework through four practical case studies on the OpenTitan design synthesized for Xilinx 7-Series FPGAs. While current protections such as bitstream authentication and encryption often fall short, our work highlights and discusses the urgency of developing effective countermeasures. We recommend using FPGAs as trust anchors only when bitstream manipulation attacks can be reliably excluded.</description><subject>Circuit protection</subject><subject>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security</subject><subject>Countermeasures</subject><subject>Field programmable gate arrays</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Military applications</subject><subject>Reverse engineering</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j0tLAzEYRYMgWGp_gCsDrmf88pyJu1ptLVQsOPshk2RsSudhMhX7762tru7iHi73IHRDIOW5EHCvw7f_SiknJCUEJFygEWWMJDmn9ApNYtwCAJUZFYKN0NNaD2bj2w88Xy-m8QEXG4ffndkHPxzwsul33ujBd23EXY0f_RCH4HSDXzvr6__qGl3Wehfd5C_HqJg_F7OXZPW2WM6mq0QLShJOrOSZFkrWAipT5RkHxoUwjlle5ZZRpahUVlqXV5niWW6NkJwKXYOprWRjdHuePSmWffCNDofyV7U8qR6JuzPRh-5z7-JQbrt9aI-fSkYYCAClCPsBy2lVRg</recordid><startdate>20241117</startdate><enddate>20241117</enddate><creator>Endres Puschner</creator><creator>Ender, Maik</creator><creator>Becker, Steffen</creator><creator>Paar, Christof</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241117</creationdate><title>Patching FPGAs: The Security Implications of Bitstream Modifications</title><author>Endres Puschner ; Ender, Maik ; Becker, Steffen ; Paar, Christof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-41d647a596f50bcb87403455ce3d4b8d3299269d6de8b79478dc56425af0cfd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Circuit protection</topic><topic>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security</topic><topic>Countermeasures</topic><topic>Field programmable gate arrays</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Military applications</topic><topic>Reverse engineering</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Endres Puschner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ender, Maik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paar, Christof</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Endres Puschner</au><au>Ender, Maik</au><au>Becker, Steffen</au><au>Paar, Christof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patching FPGAs: The Security Implications of Bitstream Modifications</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-11-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are known for their reprogrammability that allows for post-manufacture circuitry changes. Nowadays, they are integral to a variety of systems including high-security applications such as aerospace and military systems. However, this reprogrammability also introduces significant security challenges, as bitstream manipulation can directly alter hardware circuits. Malicious manipulations may lead to leakage of secret data and the implementation of hardware Trojans. In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework for manipulating bitstreams with minimal reverse engineering, thereby exposing the potential risks associated with inadequate bitstream protection. Our methodology does not require a complete understanding of proprietary bitstream formats or a fully reverse-engineered target design. Instead, it enables precise modifications by inserting pre-synthesized circuits into existing bitstreams. This novel approach is demonstrated through a semi-automated framework consisting of five steps: (1) partial bitstream reverse engineering, (2) designing the modification, (3) placing and (4) routing the modification into the existing circuit, and (5) merging of the modification with the original bitstream. We validate our framework through four practical case studies on the OpenTitan design synthesized for Xilinx 7-Series FPGAs. While current protections such as bitstream authentication and encryption often fall short, our work highlights and discusses the urgency of developing effective countermeasures. We recommend using FPGAs as trust anchors only when bitstream manipulation attacks can be reliably excluded.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2411.11060</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-11 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2411_11060 |
source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Circuit protection Computer Science - Cryptography and Security Countermeasures Field programmable gate arrays Hardware Military applications Reverse engineering Security Synthesis |
title | Patching FPGAs: The Security Implications of Bitstream Modifications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A08%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patching%20FPGAs:%20The%20Security%20Implications%20of%20Bitstream%20Modifications&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Endres%20Puschner&rft.date=2024-11-17&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2411.11060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E3130500991%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3130500991&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |