AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research
Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However, researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for the...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Lou, Renze Xu, Hanzi Wang, Sijia Du, Jiangshu Kamoi, Ryo Lu, Xiaoxin Xie, Jian Sun, Yuxuan Zhang, Yusen Ahn, Jihyun Janice Fang, Hongchao Zou, Zhuoyang Ma, Wenchao Li, Xi Zhang, Kai Xia, Congying Huang, Lifu Yin, Wenpeng |
description | Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly
large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email
writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However,
researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for
their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments,
and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a
benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental,
expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the
correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper
submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research
ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper
submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews
is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways:
first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain
expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities
that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source
and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in
conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new
versions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2410_22394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2410_22394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2410_223943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMgEKGBkZW5pwMpg6OjoG6RrqGVgpOBYXpxYXZ-alKzh6qhcrBOSXpOaVZCbmKJTkg-Qyi0sUglKLUxOLkjN4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDvJtriLOHLtiC-IKizNzEosp4kEXxYIuMCasAAF-vMJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Lou, Renze ; Xu, Hanzi ; Wang, Sijia ; Du, Jiangshu ; Kamoi, Ryo ; Lu, Xiaoxin ; Xie, Jian ; Sun, Yuxuan ; Zhang, Yusen ; Ahn, Jihyun Janice ; Fang, Hongchao ; Zou, Zhuoyang ; Ma, Wenchao ; Li, Xi ; Zhang, Kai ; Xia, Congying ; Huang, Lifu ; Yin, Wenpeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lou, Renze ; Xu, Hanzi ; Wang, Sijia ; Du, Jiangshu ; Kamoi, Ryo ; Lu, Xiaoxin ; Xie, Jian ; Sun, Yuxuan ; Zhang, Yusen ; Ahn, Jihyun Janice ; Fang, Hongchao ; Zou, Zhuoyang ; Ma, Wenchao ; Li, Xi ; Zhang, Kai ; Xia, Congying ; Huang, Lifu ; Yin, Wenpeng</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly
large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email
writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However,
researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for
their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments,
and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a
benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental,
expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the
correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper
submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research
ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper
submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews
is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways:
first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain
expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities
that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source
and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in
conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new
versions.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><creationdate>2024-10</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,781,886</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22394$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.22394$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lou, Renze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hanzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jiangshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamoi, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiaoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yuxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yusen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jihyun Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hongchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Zhuoyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wenchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Congying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Lifu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Wenpeng</creatorcontrib><title>AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research</title><description>Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly
large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email
writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However,
researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for
their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments,
and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a
benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental,
expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the
correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper
submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research
ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper
submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews
is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways:
first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain
expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities
that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source
and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in
conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new
versions.</description><subject>Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMgEKGBkZW5pwMpg6OjoG6RrqGVgpOBYXpxYXZ-alKzh6qhcrBOSXpOaVZCbmKJTkg-Qyi0sUglKLUxOLkjN4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDvJtriLOHLtiC-IKizNzEosp4kEXxYIuMCasAAF-vMJA</recordid><startdate>20241029</startdate><enddate>20241029</enddate><creator>Lou, Renze</creator><creator>Xu, Hanzi</creator><creator>Wang, Sijia</creator><creator>Du, Jiangshu</creator><creator>Kamoi, Ryo</creator><creator>Lu, Xiaoxin</creator><creator>Xie, Jian</creator><creator>Sun, Yuxuan</creator><creator>Zhang, Yusen</creator><creator>Ahn, Jihyun Janice</creator><creator>Fang, Hongchao</creator><creator>Zou, Zhuoyang</creator><creator>Ma, Wenchao</creator><creator>Li, Xi</creator><creator>Zhang, Kai</creator><creator>Xia, Congying</creator><creator>Huang, Lifu</creator><creator>Yin, Wenpeng</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241029</creationdate><title>AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research</title><author>Lou, Renze ; Xu, Hanzi ; Wang, Sijia ; Du, Jiangshu ; Kamoi, Ryo ; Lu, Xiaoxin ; Xie, Jian ; Sun, Yuxuan ; Zhang, Yusen ; Ahn, Jihyun Janice ; Fang, Hongchao ; Zou, Zhuoyang ; Ma, Wenchao ; Li, Xi ; Zhang, Kai ; Xia, Congying ; Huang, Lifu ; Yin, Wenpeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2410_223943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Computation and Language</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lou, Renze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hanzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jiangshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamoi, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiaoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yuxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yusen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jihyun Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hongchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Zhuoyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wenchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Congying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Lifu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Wenpeng</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lou, Renze</au><au>Xu, Hanzi</au><au>Wang, Sijia</au><au>Du, Jiangshu</au><au>Kamoi, Ryo</au><au>Lu, Xiaoxin</au><au>Xie, Jian</au><au>Sun, Yuxuan</au><au>Zhang, Yusen</au><au>Ahn, Jihyun Janice</au><au>Fang, Hongchao</au><au>Zou, Zhuoyang</au><au>Ma, Wenchao</au><au>Li, Xi</au><au>Zhang, Kai</au><au>Xia, Congying</au><au>Huang, Lifu</au><au>Yin, Wenpeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research</atitle><date>2024-10-29</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly
large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email
writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However,
researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for
their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments,
and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a
benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental,
expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the
correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper
submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research
ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper
submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews
is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways:
first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain
expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities
that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source
and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in
conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new
versions.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2410_22394 |
source | arXiv.org |
subjects | Computer Science - Computation and Language |
title | AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T01%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AAAR-1.0:%20Assessing%20AI's%20Potential%20to%20Assist%20Research&rft.au=Lou,%20Renze&rft.date=2024-10-29&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2410_22394%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |