AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research

Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However, researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lou, Renze, Xu, Hanzi, Wang, Sijia, Du, Jiangshu, Kamoi, Ryo, Lu, Xiaoxin, Xie, Jian, Sun, Yuxuan, Zhang, Yusen, Ahn, Jihyun Janice, Fang, Hongchao, Zou, Zhuoyang, Ma, Wenchao, Li, Xi, Zhang, Kai, Xia, Congying, Huang, Lifu, Yin, Wenpeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Lou, Renze
Xu, Hanzi
Wang, Sijia
Du, Jiangshu
Kamoi, Ryo
Lu, Xiaoxin
Xie, Jian
Sun, Yuxuan
Zhang, Yusen
Ahn, Jihyun Janice
Fang, Hongchao
Zou, Zhuoyang
Ma, Wenchao
Li, Xi
Zhang, Kai
Xia, Congying
Huang, Lifu
Yin, Wenpeng
description Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However, researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments, and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental, expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways: first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new versions.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2410_22394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2410_22394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2410_223943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMgEKGBkZW5pwMpg6OjoG6RrqGVgpOBYXpxYXZ-alKzh6qhcrBOSXpOaVZCbmKJTkg-Qyi0sUglKLUxOLkjN4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDvJtriLOHLtiC-IKizNzEosp4kEXxYIuMCasAAF-vMJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Lou, Renze ; Xu, Hanzi ; Wang, Sijia ; Du, Jiangshu ; Kamoi, Ryo ; Lu, Xiaoxin ; Xie, Jian ; Sun, Yuxuan ; Zhang, Yusen ; Ahn, Jihyun Janice ; Fang, Hongchao ; Zou, Zhuoyang ; Ma, Wenchao ; Li, Xi ; Zhang, Kai ; Xia, Congying ; Huang, Lifu ; Yin, Wenpeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lou, Renze ; Xu, Hanzi ; Wang, Sijia ; Du, Jiangshu ; Kamoi, Ryo ; Lu, Xiaoxin ; Xie, Jian ; Sun, Yuxuan ; Zhang, Yusen ; Ahn, Jihyun Janice ; Fang, Hongchao ; Zou, Zhuoyang ; Ma, Wenchao ; Li, Xi ; Zhang, Kai ; Xia, Congying ; Huang, Lifu ; Yin, Wenpeng</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However, researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments, and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental, expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways: first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new versions.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><creationdate>2024-10</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,781,886</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22394$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.22394$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lou, Renze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hanzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jiangshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamoi, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiaoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yuxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yusen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jihyun Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hongchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Zhuoyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wenchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Congying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Lifu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Wenpeng</creatorcontrib><title>AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research</title><description>Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However, researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments, and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental, expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways: first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new versions.</description><subject>Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMgEKGBkZW5pwMpg6OjoG6RrqGVgpOBYXpxYXZ-alKzh6qhcrBOSXpOaVZCbmKJTkg-Qyi0sUglKLUxOLkjN4GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDvJtriLOHLtiC-IKizNzEosp4kEXxYIuMCasAAF-vMJA</recordid><startdate>20241029</startdate><enddate>20241029</enddate><creator>Lou, Renze</creator><creator>Xu, Hanzi</creator><creator>Wang, Sijia</creator><creator>Du, Jiangshu</creator><creator>Kamoi, Ryo</creator><creator>Lu, Xiaoxin</creator><creator>Xie, Jian</creator><creator>Sun, Yuxuan</creator><creator>Zhang, Yusen</creator><creator>Ahn, Jihyun Janice</creator><creator>Fang, Hongchao</creator><creator>Zou, Zhuoyang</creator><creator>Ma, Wenchao</creator><creator>Li, Xi</creator><creator>Zhang, Kai</creator><creator>Xia, Congying</creator><creator>Huang, Lifu</creator><creator>Yin, Wenpeng</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241029</creationdate><title>AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research</title><author>Lou, Renze ; Xu, Hanzi ; Wang, Sijia ; Du, Jiangshu ; Kamoi, Ryo ; Lu, Xiaoxin ; Xie, Jian ; Sun, Yuxuan ; Zhang, Yusen ; Ahn, Jihyun Janice ; Fang, Hongchao ; Zou, Zhuoyang ; Ma, Wenchao ; Li, Xi ; Zhang, Kai ; Xia, Congying ; Huang, Lifu ; Yin, Wenpeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2410_223943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Computation and Language</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lou, Renze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hanzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jiangshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamoi, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiaoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yuxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yusen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jihyun Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hongchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Zhuoyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wenchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Congying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Lifu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Wenpeng</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lou, Renze</au><au>Xu, Hanzi</au><au>Wang, Sijia</au><au>Du, Jiangshu</au><au>Kamoi, Ryo</au><au>Lu, Xiaoxin</au><au>Xie, Jian</au><au>Sun, Yuxuan</au><au>Zhang, Yusen</au><au>Ahn, Jihyun Janice</au><au>Fang, Hongchao</au><au>Zou, Zhuoyang</au><au>Ma, Wenchao</au><au>Li, Xi</au><au>Zhang, Kai</au><au>Xia, Congying</au><au>Huang, Lifu</au><au>Yin, Wenpeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research</atitle><date>2024-10-29</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However, researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments, and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental, expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways: first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new versions.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2410_22394
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Computation and Language
title AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T01%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AAAR-1.0:%20Assessing%20AI's%20Potential%20to%20Assist%20Research&rft.au=Lou,%20Renze&rft.date=2024-10-29&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2410.22394&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2410_22394%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true