QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught

Physical quantities in QCD do not depend upon $\alpha_s(Q)$. There is no way to measure $\alpha_s(Q)$ experimentally. If those statements sound shocking, please read on. They are actually well-known facts, though ones that are constantly being ignored in the QCD literature. Renormalized perturbation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Stevenson, P. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Stevenson, P. M
description Physical quantities in QCD do not depend upon $\alpha_s(Q)$. There is no way to measure $\alpha_s(Q)$ experimentally. If those statements sound shocking, please read on. They are actually well-known facts, though ones that are constantly being ignored in the QCD literature. Renormalized perturbation theory is not an ordinary power-series expansion; its renormalization-scheme ambiguity is not merely a minor nuisance. Rather, it is a structure in which invariance under redefinitions of the coupling is a fundamental symmetry -- a symmetry that, like any other, deserves respect. I speak bluntly because without a change in mindset perturbative QCD can never become a proper, scientific enterprise.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2409.01228
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2409_01228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2409_01228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2409_012283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjGw1DMwNDKy4GQwC3R2UQhILSopLUpKLMnMz1MIyUjNL6q0UvAsUS9WyMsvUSjPSCxRqMwvVShPLUpVKEksTc8o4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDPJuriHOHrpgG-ILijJzE4sq40E2xYNtMiasAgBE7zJD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Stevenson, P. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, P. M</creatorcontrib><description>Physical quantities in QCD do not depend upon $\alpha_s(Q)$. There is no way to measure $\alpha_s(Q)$ experimentally. If those statements sound shocking, please read on. They are actually well-known facts, though ones that are constantly being ignored in the QCD literature. Renormalized perturbation theory is not an ordinary power-series expansion; its renormalization-scheme ambiguity is not merely a minor nuisance. Rather, it is a structure in which invariance under redefinitions of the coupling is a fundamental symmetry -- a symmetry that, like any other, deserves respect. I speak bluntly because without a change in mindset perturbative QCD can never become a proper, scientific enterprise.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2409.01228</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Physics - High Energy Physics - Experiment ; Physics - High Energy Physics - Phenomenology ; Physics - High Energy Physics - Theory</subject><creationdate>2024-09</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01228$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.01228$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, P. M</creatorcontrib><title>QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught</title><description>Physical quantities in QCD do not depend upon $\alpha_s(Q)$. There is no way to measure $\alpha_s(Q)$ experimentally. If those statements sound shocking, please read on. They are actually well-known facts, though ones that are constantly being ignored in the QCD literature. Renormalized perturbation theory is not an ordinary power-series expansion; its renormalization-scheme ambiguity is not merely a minor nuisance. Rather, it is a structure in which invariance under redefinitions of the coupling is a fundamental symmetry -- a symmetry that, like any other, deserves respect. I speak bluntly because without a change in mindset perturbative QCD can never become a proper, scientific enterprise.</description><subject>Physics - High Energy Physics - Experiment</subject><subject>Physics - High Energy Physics - Phenomenology</subject><subject>Physics - High Energy Physics - Theory</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjGw1DMwNDKy4GQwC3R2UQhILSopLUpKLMnMz1MIyUjNL6q0UvAsUS9WyMsvUSjPSCxRqMwvVShPLUpVKEksTc8o4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDPJuriHOHrpgG-ILijJzE4sq40E2xYNtMiasAgBE7zJD</recordid><startdate>20240902</startdate><enddate>20240902</enddate><creator>Stevenson, P. M</creator><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240902</creationdate><title>QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught</title><author>Stevenson, P. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2409_012283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Physics - High Energy Physics - Experiment</topic><topic>Physics - High Energy Physics - Phenomenology</topic><topic>Physics - High Energy Physics - Theory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, P. M</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevenson, P. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught</atitle><date>2024-09-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Physical quantities in QCD do not depend upon $\alpha_s(Q)$. There is no way to measure $\alpha_s(Q)$ experimentally. If those statements sound shocking, please read on. They are actually well-known facts, though ones that are constantly being ignored in the QCD literature. Renormalized perturbation theory is not an ordinary power-series expansion; its renormalization-scheme ambiguity is not merely a minor nuisance. Rather, it is a structure in which invariance under redefinitions of the coupling is a fundamental symmetry -- a symmetry that, like any other, deserves respect. I speak bluntly because without a change in mindset perturbative QCD can never become a proper, scientific enterprise.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2409.01228</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2409.01228
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2409_01228
source arXiv.org
subjects Physics - High Energy Physics - Experiment
Physics - High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Physics - High Energy Physics - Theory
title QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=QCD%20Perturbation%20Theory:%20It's%20not%20what%20you%20were%20taught&rft.au=Stevenson,%20P.%20M&rft.date=2024-09-02&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2409.01228&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2409_01228%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true