Evaluating Modern Approaches in 3D Scene Reconstruction: NeRF vs Gaussian-Based Methods
Exploring the capabilities of Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and Gaussian-based methods in the context of 3D scene reconstruction, this study contrasts these modern approaches with traditional Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems. Utilizing datasets such as Replica and ScanNet, we ass...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2024-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Zhou, Yiming Zeng, Zixuan Chen, Andi Zhou, Xiaofan Ni, Haowei Zhang, Shiyao Li, Panfeng Liu, Liangxi Zheng, Mengyao Chen, Xupeng |
description | Exploring the capabilities of Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and Gaussian-based methods in the context of 3D scene reconstruction, this study contrasts these modern approaches with traditional Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems. Utilizing datasets such as Replica and ScanNet, we assess performance based on tracking accuracy, mapping fidelity, and view synthesis. Findings reveal that NeRF excels in view synthesis, offering unique capabilities in generating new perspectives from existing data, albeit at slower processing speeds. Conversely, Gaussian-based methods provide rapid processing and significant expressiveness but lack comprehensive scene completion. Enhanced by global optimization and loop closure techniques, newer methods like NICE-SLAM and SplaTAM not only surpass older frameworks such as ORB-SLAM2 in terms of robustness but also demonstrate superior performance in dynamic and complex environments. This comparative analysis bridges theoretical research with practical implications, shedding light on future developments in robust 3D scene reconstruction across various real-world applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2408.04268 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2408_04268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3091015370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-af5b806f96f29b50ce6c92f8c1b4aae32ec405c7160d879d593c006a116432623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz81OwkAUBeCJiYkEeQBXTuK6eOe3U3eIgCagCZK4bC7TqZTgFGfaBt9eBFdnc3JyPkJuGAylUQruMRyqbsglmCFIrs0F6XEhWGIk51dkEOMWALhOuVKiRz4mHe5abCr_SRd14YKno_0-1Gg3LtLKU_FE363zji6drX1sQmubqvYP9NUtp7SLdIZtjBX65BGjK-jCNZu6iNfkssRddIP_7JPVdLIaPyfzt9nLeDRPUHFIsFRrA7rMdMmztQLrtM14aSxbS0QnuLMSlE2ZhsKkWaEyYQE0Mqal4JqLPrk9z57U-T5UXxh-8j99ftIfG3fnxhH13brY5Nu6Df74KReQMWBKpCB-AW53W68</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3091015370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Modern Approaches in 3D Scene Reconstruction: NeRF vs Gaussian-Based Methods</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Zhou, Yiming ; Zeng, Zixuan ; Chen, Andi ; Zhou, Xiaofan ; Ni, Haowei ; Zhang, Shiyao ; Li, Panfeng ; Liu, Liangxi ; Zheng, Mengyao ; Chen, Xupeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yiming ; Zeng, Zixuan ; Chen, Andi ; Zhou, Xiaofan ; Ni, Haowei ; Zhang, Shiyao ; Li, Panfeng ; Liu, Liangxi ; Zheng, Mengyao ; Chen, Xupeng</creatorcontrib><description>Exploring the capabilities of Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and Gaussian-based methods in the context of 3D scene reconstruction, this study contrasts these modern approaches with traditional Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems. Utilizing datasets such as Replica and ScanNet, we assess performance based on tracking accuracy, mapping fidelity, and view synthesis. Findings reveal that NeRF excels in view synthesis, offering unique capabilities in generating new perspectives from existing data, albeit at slower processing speeds. Conversely, Gaussian-based methods provide rapid processing and significant expressiveness but lack comprehensive scene completion. Enhanced by global optimization and loop closure techniques, newer methods like NICE-SLAM and SplaTAM not only surpass older frameworks such as ORB-SLAM2 in terms of robustness but also demonstrate superior performance in dynamic and complex environments. This comparative analysis bridges theoretical research with practical implications, shedding light on future developments in robust 3D scene reconstruction across various real-world applications.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2408.04268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ; Computer Science - Learning ; Gaussian process ; Global optimization ; Reconstruction ; Simultaneous localization and mapping ; Synthesis</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-11</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1109/DOCS63458.2024.10704527$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.04268$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Zixuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Andi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xiaofan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Haowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shiyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Panfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Liangxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Mengyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xupeng</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Modern Approaches in 3D Scene Reconstruction: NeRF vs Gaussian-Based Methods</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Exploring the capabilities of Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and Gaussian-based methods in the context of 3D scene reconstruction, this study contrasts these modern approaches with traditional Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems. Utilizing datasets such as Replica and ScanNet, we assess performance based on tracking accuracy, mapping fidelity, and view synthesis. Findings reveal that NeRF excels in view synthesis, offering unique capabilities in generating new perspectives from existing data, albeit at slower processing speeds. Conversely, Gaussian-based methods provide rapid processing and significant expressiveness but lack comprehensive scene completion. Enhanced by global optimization and loop closure techniques, newer methods like NICE-SLAM and SplaTAM not only surpass older frameworks such as ORB-SLAM2 in terms of robustness but also demonstrate superior performance in dynamic and complex environments. This comparative analysis bridges theoretical research with practical implications, shedding light on future developments in robust 3D scene reconstruction across various real-world applications.</description><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</subject><subject>Computer Science - Learning</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Global optimization</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Simultaneous localization and mapping</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotz81OwkAUBeCJiYkEeQBXTuK6eOe3U3eIgCagCZK4bC7TqZTgFGfaBt9eBFdnc3JyPkJuGAylUQruMRyqbsglmCFIrs0F6XEhWGIk51dkEOMWALhOuVKiRz4mHe5abCr_SRd14YKno_0-1Gg3LtLKU_FE363zji6drX1sQmubqvYP9NUtp7SLdIZtjBX65BGjK-jCNZu6iNfkssRddIP_7JPVdLIaPyfzt9nLeDRPUHFIsFRrA7rMdMmztQLrtM14aSxbS0QnuLMSlE2ZhsKkWaEyYQE0Mqal4JqLPrk9z57U-T5UXxh-8j99ftIfG3fnxhH13brY5Nu6Df74KReQMWBKpCB-AW53W68</recordid><startdate>20241114</startdate><enddate>20241114</enddate><creator>Zhou, Yiming</creator><creator>Zeng, Zixuan</creator><creator>Chen, Andi</creator><creator>Zhou, Xiaofan</creator><creator>Ni, Haowei</creator><creator>Zhang, Shiyao</creator><creator>Li, Panfeng</creator><creator>Liu, Liangxi</creator><creator>Zheng, Mengyao</creator><creator>Chen, Xupeng</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241114</creationdate><title>Evaluating Modern Approaches in 3D Scene Reconstruction: NeRF vs Gaussian-Based Methods</title><author>Zhou, Yiming ; Zeng, Zixuan ; Chen, Andi ; Zhou, Xiaofan ; Ni, Haowei ; Zhang, Shiyao ; Li, Panfeng ; Liu, Liangxi ; Zheng, Mengyao ; Chen, Xupeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-af5b806f96f29b50ce6c92f8c1b4aae32ec405c7160d879d593c006a116432623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</topic><topic>Computer Science - Learning</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Global optimization</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Simultaneous localization and mapping</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Zixuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Andi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xiaofan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Haowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shiyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Panfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Liangxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Mengyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xupeng</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Yiming</au><au>Zeng, Zixuan</au><au>Chen, Andi</au><au>Zhou, Xiaofan</au><au>Ni, Haowei</au><au>Zhang, Shiyao</au><au>Li, Panfeng</au><au>Liu, Liangxi</au><au>Zheng, Mengyao</au><au>Chen, Xupeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Modern Approaches in 3D Scene Reconstruction: NeRF vs Gaussian-Based Methods</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-11-14</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Exploring the capabilities of Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and Gaussian-based methods in the context of 3D scene reconstruction, this study contrasts these modern approaches with traditional Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems. Utilizing datasets such as Replica and ScanNet, we assess performance based on tracking accuracy, mapping fidelity, and view synthesis. Findings reveal that NeRF excels in view synthesis, offering unique capabilities in generating new perspectives from existing data, albeit at slower processing speeds. Conversely, Gaussian-based methods provide rapid processing and significant expressiveness but lack comprehensive scene completion. Enhanced by global optimization and loop closure techniques, newer methods like NICE-SLAM and SplaTAM not only surpass older frameworks such as ORB-SLAM2 in terms of robustness but also demonstrate superior performance in dynamic and complex environments. This comparative analysis bridges theoretical research with practical implications, shedding light on future developments in robust 3D scene reconstruction across various real-world applications.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2408.04268</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-11 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2408_04268 |
source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Computer Science - Learning Gaussian process Global optimization Reconstruction Simultaneous localization and mapping Synthesis |
title | Evaluating Modern Approaches in 3D Scene Reconstruction: NeRF vs Gaussian-Based Methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T20%3A01%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Modern%20Approaches%20in%203D%20Scene%20Reconstruction:%20NeRF%20vs%20Gaussian-Based%20Methods&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Zhou,%20Yiming&rft.date=2024-11-14&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2408.04268&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E3091015370%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3091015370&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |