My Ontologist: Evaluating BFO-Based AI for Definition Support
Generative artificial intelligence (AI), exemplified by the release of GPT-3.5 in 2022, has significantly advanced the potential applications of large language models (LLMs), including in the realms of ontology development and knowledge graph creation. Ontologies, which are structured frameworks for...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Benson, Carter Sculley, Alec Liebers, Austin Beverley, John |
description | Generative artificial intelligence (AI), exemplified by the release of
GPT-3.5 in 2022, has significantly advanced the potential applications of large
language models (LLMs), including in the realms of ontology development and
knowledge graph creation. Ontologies, which are structured frameworks for
organizing information, and knowledge graphs, which combine ontologies with
actual data, are essential for enabling interoperability and automated
reasoning. However, current research has largely overlooked the generation of
ontologies extending from established upper-level frameworks like the Basic
Formal Ontology (BFO), risking the creation of non-integrable ontology silos.
This study explores the extent to which LLMs, particularly GPT-4, can support
ontologists trained in BFO. Through iterative development of a specialized GPT
model named "My Ontologist," we aimed to generate BFO-conformant ontologies.
Initial versions faced challenges in maintaining definition conventions and
leveraging foundational texts effectively. My Ontologist 3.0 showed promise by
adhering to structured rules and modular ontology suites, yet the release of
GPT-4o disrupted this progress by altering the model's behavior. Our findings
underscore the importance of aligning LLM-generated ontologies with top-level
standards and highlight the complexities of integrating evolving AI
capabilities in ontology engineering. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2407.17657 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2407_17657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407_17657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2407_176573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjEw1zM0NzM152Sw9a1U8M8ryc_JT88sLrFScC1LzClNLMnMS1dwcvPXdUosTk1RcPRUSMsvUnBJTcvMyyzJzM9TCC4tKMgvKuFhYE1LzClO5YXS3Azybq4hzh66YIviC4oycxOLKuNBFsaDLTQmrAIA0kc0wg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>My Ontologist: Evaluating BFO-Based AI for Definition Support</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Benson, Carter ; Sculley, Alec ; Liebers, Austin ; Beverley, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Benson, Carter ; Sculley, Alec ; Liebers, Austin ; Beverley, John</creatorcontrib><description>Generative artificial intelligence (AI), exemplified by the release of
GPT-3.5 in 2022, has significantly advanced the potential applications of large
language models (LLMs), including in the realms of ontology development and
knowledge graph creation. Ontologies, which are structured frameworks for
organizing information, and knowledge graphs, which combine ontologies with
actual data, are essential for enabling interoperability and automated
reasoning. However, current research has largely overlooked the generation of
ontologies extending from established upper-level frameworks like the Basic
Formal Ontology (BFO), risking the creation of non-integrable ontology silos.
This study explores the extent to which LLMs, particularly GPT-4, can support
ontologists trained in BFO. Through iterative development of a specialized GPT
model named "My Ontologist," we aimed to generate BFO-conformant ontologies.
Initial versions faced challenges in maintaining definition conventions and
leveraging foundational texts effectively. My Ontologist 3.0 showed promise by
adhering to structured rules and modular ontology suites, yet the release of
GPT-4o disrupted this progress by altering the model's behavior. Our findings
underscore the importance of aligning LLM-generated ontologies with top-level
standards and highlight the complexities of integrating evolving AI
capabilities in ontology engineering.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2407.17657</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Databases</subject><creationdate>2024-07</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17657$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.17657$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benson, Carter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sculley, Alec</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebers, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beverley, John</creatorcontrib><title>My Ontologist: Evaluating BFO-Based AI for Definition Support</title><description>Generative artificial intelligence (AI), exemplified by the release of
GPT-3.5 in 2022, has significantly advanced the potential applications of large
language models (LLMs), including in the realms of ontology development and
knowledge graph creation. Ontologies, which are structured frameworks for
organizing information, and knowledge graphs, which combine ontologies with
actual data, are essential for enabling interoperability and automated
reasoning. However, current research has largely overlooked the generation of
ontologies extending from established upper-level frameworks like the Basic
Formal Ontology (BFO), risking the creation of non-integrable ontology silos.
This study explores the extent to which LLMs, particularly GPT-4, can support
ontologists trained in BFO. Through iterative development of a specialized GPT
model named "My Ontologist," we aimed to generate BFO-conformant ontologies.
Initial versions faced challenges in maintaining definition conventions and
leveraging foundational texts effectively. My Ontologist 3.0 showed promise by
adhering to structured rules and modular ontology suites, yet the release of
GPT-4o disrupted this progress by altering the model's behavior. Our findings
underscore the importance of aligning LLM-generated ontologies with top-level
standards and highlight the complexities of integrating evolving AI
capabilities in ontology engineering.</description><subject>Computer Science - Databases</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjEw1zM0NzM152Sw9a1U8M8ryc_JT88sLrFScC1LzClNLMnMS1dwcvPXdUosTk1RcPRUSMsvUnBJTcvMyyzJzM9TCC4tKMgvKuFhYE1LzClO5YXS3Azybq4hzh66YIviC4oycxOLKuNBFsaDLTQmrAIA0kc0wg</recordid><startdate>20240724</startdate><enddate>20240724</enddate><creator>Benson, Carter</creator><creator>Sculley, Alec</creator><creator>Liebers, Austin</creator><creator>Beverley, John</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240724</creationdate><title>My Ontologist: Evaluating BFO-Based AI for Definition Support</title><author>Benson, Carter ; Sculley, Alec ; Liebers, Austin ; Beverley, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2407_176573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Databases</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benson, Carter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sculley, Alec</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebers, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beverley, John</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benson, Carter</au><au>Sculley, Alec</au><au>Liebers, Austin</au><au>Beverley, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>My Ontologist: Evaluating BFO-Based AI for Definition Support</atitle><date>2024-07-24</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Generative artificial intelligence (AI), exemplified by the release of
GPT-3.5 in 2022, has significantly advanced the potential applications of large
language models (LLMs), including in the realms of ontology development and
knowledge graph creation. Ontologies, which are structured frameworks for
organizing information, and knowledge graphs, which combine ontologies with
actual data, are essential for enabling interoperability and automated
reasoning. However, current research has largely overlooked the generation of
ontologies extending from established upper-level frameworks like the Basic
Formal Ontology (BFO), risking the creation of non-integrable ontology silos.
This study explores the extent to which LLMs, particularly GPT-4, can support
ontologists trained in BFO. Through iterative development of a specialized GPT
model named "My Ontologist," we aimed to generate BFO-conformant ontologies.
Initial versions faced challenges in maintaining definition conventions and
leveraging foundational texts effectively. My Ontologist 3.0 showed promise by
adhering to structured rules and modular ontology suites, yet the release of
GPT-4o disrupted this progress by altering the model's behavior. Our findings
underscore the importance of aligning LLM-generated ontologies with top-level
standards and highlight the complexities of integrating evolving AI
capabilities in ontology engineering.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2407.17657</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2407.17657 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2407_17657 |
source | arXiv.org |
subjects | Computer Science - Databases |
title | My Ontologist: Evaluating BFO-Based AI for Definition Support |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A00%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=My%20Ontologist:%20Evaluating%20BFO-Based%20AI%20for%20Definition%20Support&rft.au=Benson,%20Carter&rft.date=2024-07-24&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2407.17657&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2407_17657%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |