When Qualitative Research Meets Large Language Model: Exploring the Potential of QualiGPT as a Tool for Qualitative Coding

Qualitative research, renowned for its in-depth exploration of complex phenomena, often involves time-intensive analysis, particularly during the coding stage. Existing software for qualitative evaluation frequently lacks automatic coding capabilities, user-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, He, Wu, Chuhao, Xie, Jingyi, Rubino, Fiona, Graver, Sydney, Kim, ChanMin, Carroll, John M, Cai, Jie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Zhang, He
Wu, Chuhao
Xie, Jingyi
Rubino, Fiona
Graver, Sydney
Kim, ChanMin
Carroll, John M
Cai, Jie
description Qualitative research, renowned for its in-depth exploration of complex phenomena, often involves time-intensive analysis, particularly during the coding stage. Existing software for qualitative evaluation frequently lacks automatic coding capabilities, user-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and its successors marks a transformative era for enhancing qualitative analysis. This paper introduces QualiGPT, a tool developed to address the challenges associated with using ChatGPT for qualitative analysis. Through a comparative analysis of traditional manual coding and QualiGPT's performance on both simulated and real datasets, incorporating both inductive and deductive coding approaches, we demonstrate that QualiGPT significantly improves the qualitative analysis process. Our findings show that QualiGPT enhances efficiency, transparency, and accessibility in qualitative coding. The tool's performance was evaluated using inter-rater reliability (IRR) measures, with results indicating substantial agreement between human coders and QualiGPT in various coding scenarios. In addition, we also discuss the implications of integrating AI into qualitative research workflows and outline future directions for enhancing human-AI collaboration in this field.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2407.14925
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2407_14925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407_14925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2407_149253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjr0OgkAQhK-xMOoDWLkvIAJC_GkJaiEJGhJLspEFLjk5cncQ9OnFn8bKZmaKmd2PsaljW97a9-0Fqo63luvZK8vxNq4_ZI9LSRWcGhTcoOEtwZk0obqWEBEZDUdUBfVaFQ32IZIZiS2EXS2k4lUBpiSIpaHKcBQg88-tfZwAakBIpBSQS_XzIpBZPx2zQY5C0-TrIzbbhUlwmL8p01rxG6p7-qJN37TL_40nzbZLEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Qualitative Research Meets Large Language Model: Exploring the Potential of QualiGPT as a Tool for Qualitative Coding</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Zhang, He ; Wu, Chuhao ; Xie, Jingyi ; Rubino, Fiona ; Graver, Sydney ; Kim, ChanMin ; Carroll, John M ; Cai, Jie</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, He ; Wu, Chuhao ; Xie, Jingyi ; Rubino, Fiona ; Graver, Sydney ; Kim, ChanMin ; Carroll, John M ; Cai, Jie</creatorcontrib><description>Qualitative research, renowned for its in-depth exploration of complex phenomena, often involves time-intensive analysis, particularly during the coding stage. Existing software for qualitative evaluation frequently lacks automatic coding capabilities, user-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and its successors marks a transformative era for enhancing qualitative analysis. This paper introduces QualiGPT, a tool developed to address the challenges associated with using ChatGPT for qualitative analysis. Through a comparative analysis of traditional manual coding and QualiGPT's performance on both simulated and real datasets, incorporating both inductive and deductive coding approaches, we demonstrate that QualiGPT significantly improves the qualitative analysis process. Our findings show that QualiGPT enhances efficiency, transparency, and accessibility in qualitative coding. The tool's performance was evaluated using inter-rater reliability (IRR) measures, with results indicating substantial agreement between human coders and QualiGPT in various coding scenarios. In addition, we also discuss the implications of integrating AI into qualitative research workflows and outline future directions for enhancing human-AI collaboration in this field.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2407.14925</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction</subject><creationdate>2024-07</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14925$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.14925$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chuhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graver, Sydney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, ChanMin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jie</creatorcontrib><title>When Qualitative Research Meets Large Language Model: Exploring the Potential of QualiGPT as a Tool for Qualitative Coding</title><description>Qualitative research, renowned for its in-depth exploration of complex phenomena, often involves time-intensive analysis, particularly during the coding stage. Existing software for qualitative evaluation frequently lacks automatic coding capabilities, user-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and its successors marks a transformative era for enhancing qualitative analysis. This paper introduces QualiGPT, a tool developed to address the challenges associated with using ChatGPT for qualitative analysis. Through a comparative analysis of traditional manual coding and QualiGPT's performance on both simulated and real datasets, incorporating both inductive and deductive coding approaches, we demonstrate that QualiGPT significantly improves the qualitative analysis process. Our findings show that QualiGPT enhances efficiency, transparency, and accessibility in qualitative coding. The tool's performance was evaluated using inter-rater reliability (IRR) measures, with results indicating substantial agreement between human coders and QualiGPT in various coding scenarios. In addition, we also discuss the implications of integrating AI into qualitative research workflows and outline future directions for enhancing human-AI collaboration in this field.</description><subject>Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjr0OgkAQhK-xMOoDWLkvIAJC_GkJaiEJGhJLspEFLjk5cncQ9OnFn8bKZmaKmd2PsaljW97a9-0Fqo63luvZK8vxNq4_ZI9LSRWcGhTcoOEtwZk0obqWEBEZDUdUBfVaFQ32IZIZiS2EXS2k4lUBpiSIpaHKcBQg88-tfZwAakBIpBSQS_XzIpBZPx2zQY5C0-TrIzbbhUlwmL8p01rxG6p7-qJN37TL_40nzbZLEA</recordid><startdate>20240720</startdate><enddate>20240720</enddate><creator>Zhang, He</creator><creator>Wu, Chuhao</creator><creator>Xie, Jingyi</creator><creator>Rubino, Fiona</creator><creator>Graver, Sydney</creator><creator>Kim, ChanMin</creator><creator>Carroll, John M</creator><creator>Cai, Jie</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240720</creationdate><title>When Qualitative Research Meets Large Language Model: Exploring the Potential of QualiGPT as a Tool for Qualitative Coding</title><author>Zhang, He ; Wu, Chuhao ; Xie, Jingyi ; Rubino, Fiona ; Graver, Sydney ; Kim, ChanMin ; Carroll, John M ; Cai, Jie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2407_149253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chuhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubino, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graver, Sydney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, ChanMin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jie</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, He</au><au>Wu, Chuhao</au><au>Xie, Jingyi</au><au>Rubino, Fiona</au><au>Graver, Sydney</au><au>Kim, ChanMin</au><au>Carroll, John M</au><au>Cai, Jie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When Qualitative Research Meets Large Language Model: Exploring the Potential of QualiGPT as a Tool for Qualitative Coding</atitle><date>2024-07-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Qualitative research, renowned for its in-depth exploration of complex phenomena, often involves time-intensive analysis, particularly during the coding stage. Existing software for qualitative evaluation frequently lacks automatic coding capabilities, user-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and its successors marks a transformative era for enhancing qualitative analysis. This paper introduces QualiGPT, a tool developed to address the challenges associated with using ChatGPT for qualitative analysis. Through a comparative analysis of traditional manual coding and QualiGPT's performance on both simulated and real datasets, incorporating both inductive and deductive coding approaches, we demonstrate that QualiGPT significantly improves the qualitative analysis process. Our findings show that QualiGPT enhances efficiency, transparency, and accessibility in qualitative coding. The tool's performance was evaluated using inter-rater reliability (IRR) measures, with results indicating substantial agreement between human coders and QualiGPT in various coding scenarios. In addition, we also discuss the implications of integrating AI into qualitative research workflows and outline future directions for enhancing human-AI collaboration in this field.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2407.14925</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2407.14925
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2407_14925
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction
title When Qualitative Research Meets Large Language Model: Exploring the Potential of QualiGPT as a Tool for Qualitative Coding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A15%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Qualitative%20Research%20Meets%20Large%20Language%20Model:%20Exploring%20the%20Potential%20of%20QualiGPT%20as%20a%20Tool%20for%20Qualitative%20Coding&rft.au=Zhang,%20He&rft.date=2024-07-20&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2407.14925&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2407_14925%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true