Parameter estimation of epidemic spread in two-layer random graphs by classical and machine learning methods

Parameter estimation of epidemic spread in two-layer random graphs by classical and machine learning methods

Our main goal in this paper is to quantitatively compare the performance of classical methods to XGBoost and convolutional neural networks in a parameter estimation problem for epidemic spread. As we use flexible two-layer random graphs as the underlying network, we can also study how much the struc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Backhausz, Ágnes, Bognár, Edit, Csiszár, Villő, Tárkányi, Damján, Zempléni, András
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Computer Science - Social and Information Networks
Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Backhausz, Ágnes
Bognár, Edit
Csiszár, Villő
Tárkányi, Damján
Zempléni, András
description Our main goal in this paper is to quantitatively compare the performance of classical methods to XGBoost and convolutional neural networks in a parameter estimation problem for epidemic spread. As we use flexible two-layer random graphs as the underlying network, we can also study how much the structure of the graphs in the training set and the test set can differ while to get a reasonably good estimate. In addition, we also examine whether additional information (such as the average degree of infected vertices) can help improving the results, compared to the case when we only know the time series consisting of the number of susceptible and infected individuals. Our simulation results also show which methods are most accurate in the different phases of the epidemic.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2407.07118
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2407_07118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407_07118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2407_071183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjrsOgkAQRbexMOoHWDk_AIJCoDcaSwt7MsIAk-yDzG5U_l4k9la3uCc5R6ltmsRZmefJHuXNz_iQJUWcFGlaLpW-oaChQALkAxsM7Cy4FmjghgzX4AchbIAthJeLNI4TKmgbZ6ATHHoPjxFqjd5zjRqmBwzWPVsCTSiWbQeToHeNX6tFi9rT5rcrtbuc76drNHdVg0x-GatvXzX3Hf8TH0WRR4M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parameter estimation of epidemic spread in two-layer random graphs by classical and machine learning methods</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Backhausz, Ágnes ; Bognár, Edit ; Csiszár, Villő ; Tárkányi, Damján ; Zempléni, András</creator><creatorcontrib>Backhausz, Ágnes ; Bognár, Edit ; Csiszár, Villő ; Tárkányi, Damján ; Zempléni, András</creatorcontrib><description>Our main goal in this paper is to quantitatively compare the performance of classical methods to XGBoost and convolutional neural networks in a parameter estimation problem for epidemic spread. As we use flexible two-layer random graphs as the underlying network, we can also study how much the structure of the graphs in the training set and the test set can differ while to get a reasonably good estimate. In addition, we also examine whether additional information (such as the average degree of infected vertices) can help improving the results, compared to the case when we only know the time series consisting of the number of susceptible and infected individuals. Our simulation results also show which methods are most accurate in the different phases of the epidemic.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2407.07118</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Social and Information Networks ; Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution</subject><creationdate>2024-07</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07118$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.07118$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Backhausz, Ágnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bognár, Edit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csiszár, Villő</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tárkányi, Damján</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zempléni, András</creatorcontrib><title>Parameter estimation of epidemic spread in two-layer random graphs by classical and machine learning methods</title><description>Our main goal in this paper is to quantitatively compare the performance of classical methods to XGBoost and convolutional neural networks in a parameter estimation problem for epidemic spread. As we use flexible two-layer random graphs as the underlying network, we can also study how much the structure of the graphs in the training set and the test set can differ while to get a reasonably good estimate. In addition, we also examine whether additional information (such as the average degree of infected vertices) can help improving the results, compared to the case when we only know the time series consisting of the number of susceptible and infected individuals. Our simulation results also show which methods are most accurate in the different phases of the epidemic.</description><subject>Computer Science - Social and Information Networks</subject><subject>Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjrsOgkAQRbexMOoHWDk_AIJCoDcaSwt7MsIAk-yDzG5U_l4k9la3uCc5R6ltmsRZmefJHuXNz_iQJUWcFGlaLpW-oaChQALkAxsM7Cy4FmjghgzX4AchbIAthJeLNI4TKmgbZ6ATHHoPjxFqjd5zjRqmBwzWPVsCTSiWbQeToHeNX6tFi9rT5rcrtbuc76drNHdVg0x-GatvXzX3Hf8TH0WRR4M</recordid><startdate>20240703</startdate><enddate>20240703</enddate><creator>Backhausz, Ágnes</creator><creator>Bognár, Edit</creator><creator>Csiszár, Villő</creator><creator>Tárkányi, Damján</creator><creator>Zempléni, András</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>ALC</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240703</creationdate><title>Parameter estimation of epidemic spread in two-layer random graphs by classical and machine learning methods</title><author>Backhausz, Ágnes ; Bognár, Edit ; Csiszár, Villő ; Tárkányi, Damján ; Zempléni, András</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2407_071183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Social and Information Networks</topic><topic>Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Backhausz, Ágnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bognár, Edit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csiszár, Villő</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tárkányi, Damján</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zempléni, András</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv Quantitative Biology</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Backhausz, Ágnes</au><au>Bognár, Edit</au><au>Csiszár, Villő</au><au>Tárkányi, Damján</au><au>Zempléni, András</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parameter estimation of epidemic spread in two-layer random graphs by classical and machine learning methods</atitle><date>2024-07-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Our main goal in this paper is to quantitatively compare the performance of classical methods to XGBoost and convolutional neural networks in a parameter estimation problem for epidemic spread. As we use flexible two-layer random graphs as the underlying network, we can also study how much the structure of the graphs in the training set and the test set can differ while to get a reasonably good estimate. In addition, we also examine whether additional information (such as the average degree of infected vertices) can help improving the results, compared to the case when we only know the time series consisting of the number of susceptible and infected individuals. Our simulation results also show which methods are most accurate in the different phases of the epidemic.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2407.07118</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2407.07118
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2407_07118
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Social and Information Networks
Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution
title Parameter estimation of epidemic spread in two-layer random graphs by classical and machine learning methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A05%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parameter%20estimation%20of%20epidemic%20spread%20in%20two-layer%20random%20graphs%20by%20classical%20and%20machine%20learning%20methods&rft.au=Backhausz,%20%C3%81gnes&rft.date=2024-07-03&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2407.07118&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2407_07118%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true