Towards Socially and Environmentally Responsible AI

The sharply increasing sizes of artificial intelligence (AI) models come with significant energy consumption and environmental footprints, which can disproportionately impact certain (often marginalized) regions and hence create environmental inequity concerns. Moreover, concerns with social inequit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Li, Pengfei, Liu, Yejia, Yang, Jianyi, Ren, Shaolei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Li, Pengfei
Liu, Yejia
Yang, Jianyi
Ren, Shaolei
description The sharply increasing sizes of artificial intelligence (AI) models come with significant energy consumption and environmental footprints, which can disproportionately impact certain (often marginalized) regions and hence create environmental inequity concerns. Moreover, concerns with social inequity have also emerged, as AI computing resources may not be equitably distributed across the globe and users from certain disadvantaged regions with severe resource constraints can consistently experience inferior model performance. Importantly, the inequity concerns that encompass both social and environmental dimensions still remain unexplored and have increasingly hindered responsible AI. In this paper, we leverage the spatial flexibility of AI inference workloads and propose equitable geographical load balancing (GLB) to fairly balance AI's regional social and environmental costs. Concretely, to penalize the disproportionately high social and environmental costs for equity, we introduce $L_q$ norms as novel regularization terms into the optimization objective for GLB decisions. Our empirical results based on real-world AI inference traces demonstrate that while the existing GLB algorithms result in disproportionately large social and environmental costs in certain regions, our proposed equitable GLB can fairly balance AI's negative social and environmental costs across all the regions.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2407.05176
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2407_05176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407_05176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2407_051763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjEw1zMwNTQ342QwDskvTyxKKVYIzk_OTMzJqVRIzEtRcM0ryyzKz8tNzSsBiwWlFhfk5xVnJuWkKjh68jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBnk31xBnD12w8fEFRZm5iUWV8SBr4sHWGBNWAQAM0DIV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards Socially and Environmentally Responsible AI</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Li, Pengfei ; Liu, Yejia ; Yang, Jianyi ; Ren, Shaolei</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Pengfei ; Liu, Yejia ; Yang, Jianyi ; Ren, Shaolei</creatorcontrib><description>The sharply increasing sizes of artificial intelligence (AI) models come with significant energy consumption and environmental footprints, which can disproportionately impact certain (often marginalized) regions and hence create environmental inequity concerns. Moreover, concerns with social inequity have also emerged, as AI computing resources may not be equitably distributed across the globe and users from certain disadvantaged regions with severe resource constraints can consistently experience inferior model performance. Importantly, the inequity concerns that encompass both social and environmental dimensions still remain unexplored and have increasingly hindered responsible AI. In this paper, we leverage the spatial flexibility of AI inference workloads and propose equitable geographical load balancing (GLB) to fairly balance AI's regional social and environmental costs. Concretely, to penalize the disproportionately high social and environmental costs for equity, we introduce $L_q$ norms as novel regularization terms into the optimization objective for GLB decisions. Our empirical results based on real-world AI inference traces demonstrate that while the existing GLB algorithms result in disproportionately large social and environmental costs in certain regions, our proposed equitable GLB can fairly balance AI's negative social and environmental costs across all the regions.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2407.05176</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science - Computers and Society ; Computer Science - Learning</subject><creationdate>2024-04</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,781,886</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05176$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.05176$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yejia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jianyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Shaolei</creatorcontrib><title>Towards Socially and Environmentally Responsible AI</title><description>The sharply increasing sizes of artificial intelligence (AI) models come with significant energy consumption and environmental footprints, which can disproportionately impact certain (often marginalized) regions and hence create environmental inequity concerns. Moreover, concerns with social inequity have also emerged, as AI computing resources may not be equitably distributed across the globe and users from certain disadvantaged regions with severe resource constraints can consistently experience inferior model performance. Importantly, the inequity concerns that encompass both social and environmental dimensions still remain unexplored and have increasingly hindered responsible AI. In this paper, we leverage the spatial flexibility of AI inference workloads and propose equitable geographical load balancing (GLB) to fairly balance AI's regional social and environmental costs. Concretely, to penalize the disproportionately high social and environmental costs for equity, we introduce $L_q$ norms as novel regularization terms into the optimization objective for GLB decisions. Our empirical results based on real-world AI inference traces demonstrate that while the existing GLB algorithms result in disproportionately large social and environmental costs in certain regions, our proposed equitable GLB can fairly balance AI's negative social and environmental costs across all the regions.</description><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science - Computers and Society</subject><subject>Computer Science - Learning</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjEw1zMwNTQ342QwDskvTyxKKVYIzk_OTMzJqVRIzEtRcM0ryyzKz8tNzSsBiwWlFhfk5xVnJuWkKjh68jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBnk31xBnD12w8fEFRZm5iUWV8SBr4sHWGBNWAQAM0DIV</recordid><startdate>20240422</startdate><enddate>20240422</enddate><creator>Li, Pengfei</creator><creator>Liu, Yejia</creator><creator>Yang, Jianyi</creator><creator>Ren, Shaolei</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240422</creationdate><title>Towards Socially and Environmentally Responsible AI</title><author>Li, Pengfei ; Liu, Yejia ; Yang, Jianyi ; Ren, Shaolei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2407_051763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science - Computers and Society</topic><topic>Computer Science - Learning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yejia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jianyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Shaolei</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Pengfei</au><au>Liu, Yejia</au><au>Yang, Jianyi</au><au>Ren, Shaolei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards Socially and Environmentally Responsible AI</atitle><date>2024-04-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>The sharply increasing sizes of artificial intelligence (AI) models come with significant energy consumption and environmental footprints, which can disproportionately impact certain (often marginalized) regions and hence create environmental inequity concerns. Moreover, concerns with social inequity have also emerged, as AI computing resources may not be equitably distributed across the globe and users from certain disadvantaged regions with severe resource constraints can consistently experience inferior model performance. Importantly, the inequity concerns that encompass both social and environmental dimensions still remain unexplored and have increasingly hindered responsible AI. In this paper, we leverage the spatial flexibility of AI inference workloads and propose equitable geographical load balancing (GLB) to fairly balance AI's regional social and environmental costs. Concretely, to penalize the disproportionately high social and environmental costs for equity, we introduce $L_q$ norms as novel regularization terms into the optimization objective for GLB decisions. Our empirical results based on real-world AI inference traces demonstrate that while the existing GLB algorithms result in disproportionately large social and environmental costs in certain regions, our proposed equitable GLB can fairly balance AI's negative social and environmental costs across all the regions.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2407.05176</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2407.05176
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2407_05176
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science - Computers and Society
Computer Science - Learning
title Towards Socially and Environmentally Responsible AI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T14%3A25%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20Socially%20and%20Environmentally%20Responsible%20AI&rft.au=Li,%20Pengfei&rft.date=2024-04-22&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2407.05176&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2407_05176%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true