Beyond Quantum Annealing: Optimal control solutions to MaxCut problems
Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2024-05 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Pecci, Giovanni Wang, Ruiyi Torta, Pietro Mbeng, Glen Bigan Santoro, Giuseppe |
description | Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be difficult. Here, we present different techniques for improving on the linear-schedule QA along two directions, conceptually distinct but leading to similar outcomes: 1) the first approach consists of constructing a Trotter-digitized QA (dQA) with schedules parameterized in terms of Fourier modes or Chebyshev polynomials, inspired by the Chopped Random Basis algorithm (CRAB) for optimal control in continuous time; 2) the second approach is technically a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose solutions are found iteratively using linear interpolation or expansion in Fourier modes. Both approaches emphasize finding smooth optimal schedule parameters, ultimately leading to hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithms of the alternating Hamiltonian Ansatz type. We apply these techniques to MaxCut problems on weighted 3-regular graphs with N = 14 sites, focusing on hard instances that exhibit a small spectral gap, for which a standard linear-schedule QA performs poorly. We characterize the physics behind the optimal protocols for both the dQA and QAOA approaches, discovering shortcuts to adiabaticity-like dynamics. Furthermore, we study the transferability of such smooth solutions among hard instances of MaxCut at different circuit depths. Finally, we show that the smoothness pattern of these protocols obtained in a digital setting enables us to adapt them to continuous-time evolution, contrarily to generic non-smooth solutions. This procedure results in an optimized quantum annealing schedule that is implementable on analog devices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2405.08630 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2405_08630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3055210302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a950-fa438c7c6537cb7ead0a20ca88d217fe9a07c6c59388331bc6462df55cec615f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj1FLwzAUhYMgOOZ-gE8GfG69TXrb1LdZnAqTIey9pGkqHW1Sm0S2f2_dfDoP53D4PkLuEohTgQiPcjp2PzFLAWMQGYcrsmCcJ5FIGbshK-cOAMCynCHyBdk865M1Df0M0vgw0LUxWvad-Xqiu9F3g-ypssZPtqfO9sF31jjqLf2QxzJ4Ok627vXgbsl1K3unV_-5JPvNy758i7a71_dyvY1kgRC1MuVC5SpDnqs617IByUBJIRqW5K0uJMylwoILMSPXKksz1rSISqsswZYvyf3l9ixZjdMMOJ2qP9nqLDsvHi6Lmew7aOergw2TmZkqDogsAQ6M_wKmKldu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055210302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond Quantum Annealing: Optimal control solutions to MaxCut problems</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Pecci, Giovanni ; Wang, Ruiyi ; Torta, Pietro ; Mbeng, Glen Bigan ; Santoro, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Pecci, Giovanni ; Wang, Ruiyi ; Torta, Pietro ; Mbeng, Glen Bigan ; Santoro, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be difficult. Here, we present different techniques for improving on the linear-schedule QA along two directions, conceptually distinct but leading to similar outcomes: 1) the first approach consists of constructing a Trotter-digitized QA (dQA) with schedules parameterized in terms of Fourier modes or Chebyshev polynomials, inspired by the Chopped Random Basis algorithm (CRAB) for optimal control in continuous time; 2) the second approach is technically a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose solutions are found iteratively using linear interpolation or expansion in Fourier modes. Both approaches emphasize finding smooth optimal schedule parameters, ultimately leading to hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithms of the alternating Hamiltonian Ansatz type. We apply these techniques to MaxCut problems on weighted 3-regular graphs with N = 14 sites, focusing on hard instances that exhibit a small spectral gap, for which a standard linear-schedule QA performs poorly. We characterize the physics behind the optimal protocols for both the dQA and QAOA approaches, discovering shortcuts to adiabaticity-like dynamics. Furthermore, we study the transferability of such smooth solutions among hard instances of MaxCut at different circuit depths. Finally, we show that the smoothness pattern of these protocols obtained in a digital setting enables us to adapt them to continuous-time evolution, contrarily to generic non-smooth solutions. This procedure results in an optimized quantum annealing schedule that is implementable on analog devices.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2405.08630</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Chebyshev approximation ; Optimal control ; Physics - Quantum Physics ; Polynomials ; Schedules ; Smoothness ; Time dependence</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-05</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,784,885,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ad60f2$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.08630$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pecci, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ruiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torta, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbeng, Glen Bigan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond Quantum Annealing: Optimal control solutions to MaxCut problems</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be difficult. Here, we present different techniques for improving on the linear-schedule QA along two directions, conceptually distinct but leading to similar outcomes: 1) the first approach consists of constructing a Trotter-digitized QA (dQA) with schedules parameterized in terms of Fourier modes or Chebyshev polynomials, inspired by the Chopped Random Basis algorithm (CRAB) for optimal control in continuous time; 2) the second approach is technically a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose solutions are found iteratively using linear interpolation or expansion in Fourier modes. Both approaches emphasize finding smooth optimal schedule parameters, ultimately leading to hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithms of the alternating Hamiltonian Ansatz type. We apply these techniques to MaxCut problems on weighted 3-regular graphs with N = 14 sites, focusing on hard instances that exhibit a small spectral gap, for which a standard linear-schedule QA performs poorly. We characterize the physics behind the optimal protocols for both the dQA and QAOA approaches, discovering shortcuts to adiabaticity-like dynamics. Furthermore, we study the transferability of such smooth solutions among hard instances of MaxCut at different circuit depths. Finally, we show that the smoothness pattern of these protocols obtained in a digital setting enables us to adapt them to continuous-time evolution, contrarily to generic non-smooth solutions. This procedure results in an optimized quantum annealing schedule that is implementable on analog devices.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Chebyshev approximation</subject><subject>Optimal control</subject><subject>Physics - Quantum Physics</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Smoothness</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj1FLwzAUhYMgOOZ-gE8GfG69TXrb1LdZnAqTIey9pGkqHW1Sm0S2f2_dfDoP53D4PkLuEohTgQiPcjp2PzFLAWMQGYcrsmCcJ5FIGbshK-cOAMCynCHyBdk865M1Df0M0vgw0LUxWvad-Xqiu9F3g-ypssZPtqfO9sF31jjqLf2QxzJ4Ok627vXgbsl1K3unV_-5JPvNy758i7a71_dyvY1kgRC1MuVC5SpDnqs617IByUBJIRqW5K0uJMylwoILMSPXKksz1rSISqsswZYvyf3l9ixZjdMMOJ2qP9nqLDsvHi6Lmew7aOergw2TmZkqDogsAQ6M_wKmKldu</recordid><startdate>20240514</startdate><enddate>20240514</enddate><creator>Pecci, Giovanni</creator><creator>Wang, Ruiyi</creator><creator>Torta, Pietro</creator><creator>Mbeng, Glen Bigan</creator><creator>Santoro, Giuseppe</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240514</creationdate><title>Beyond Quantum Annealing: Optimal control solutions to MaxCut problems</title><author>Pecci, Giovanni ; Wang, Ruiyi ; Torta, Pietro ; Mbeng, Glen Bigan ; Santoro, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a950-fa438c7c6537cb7ead0a20ca88d217fe9a07c6c59388331bc6462df55cec615f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Chebyshev approximation</topic><topic>Optimal control</topic><topic>Physics - Quantum Physics</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Smoothness</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pecci, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ruiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torta, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbeng, Glen Bigan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pecci, Giovanni</au><au>Wang, Ruiyi</au><au>Torta, Pietro</au><au>Mbeng, Glen Bigan</au><au>Santoro, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond Quantum Annealing: Optimal control solutions to MaxCut problems</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-05-14</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be difficult. Here, we present different techniques for improving on the linear-schedule QA along two directions, conceptually distinct but leading to similar outcomes: 1) the first approach consists of constructing a Trotter-digitized QA (dQA) with schedules parameterized in terms of Fourier modes or Chebyshev polynomials, inspired by the Chopped Random Basis algorithm (CRAB) for optimal control in continuous time; 2) the second approach is technically a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose solutions are found iteratively using linear interpolation or expansion in Fourier modes. Both approaches emphasize finding smooth optimal schedule parameters, ultimately leading to hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithms of the alternating Hamiltonian Ansatz type. We apply these techniques to MaxCut problems on weighted 3-regular graphs with N = 14 sites, focusing on hard instances that exhibit a small spectral gap, for which a standard linear-schedule QA performs poorly. We characterize the physics behind the optimal protocols for both the dQA and QAOA approaches, discovering shortcuts to adiabaticity-like dynamics. Furthermore, we study the transferability of such smooth solutions among hard instances of MaxCut at different circuit depths. Finally, we show that the smoothness pattern of these protocols obtained in a digital setting enables us to adapt them to continuous-time evolution, contrarily to generic non-smooth solutions. This procedure results in an optimized quantum annealing schedule that is implementable on analog devices.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2405.08630</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-05 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2405_08630 |
source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Chebyshev approximation Optimal control Physics - Quantum Physics Polynomials Schedules Smoothness Time dependence |
title | Beyond Quantum Annealing: Optimal control solutions to MaxCut problems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20Quantum%20Annealing:%20Optimal%20control%20solutions%20to%20MaxCut%20problems&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Pecci,%20Giovanni&rft.date=2024-05-14&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2405.08630&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E3055210302%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055210302&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |