Comparative Analysis of Fluctuations in Viscoelastic Stress: A Comparison of the Temporary Network and Dumbbell models

Traditionally, stress fluctuations in flowing and deformed materials are overlooked, with an obvious focus on average stresses in a continuum mechanical approximation. However, these fluctuations, often dismissed as noise, hold the potential to provide direct insights into the material structure and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2024-04
Hauptverfasser: Winters, Arturo, Öttinger, Hans Christian, Vermant, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Winters, Arturo
Öttinger, Hans Christian
Vermant, Jan
description Traditionally, stress fluctuations in flowing and deformed materials are overlooked, with an obvious focus on average stresses in a continuum mechanical approximation. However, these fluctuations, often dismissed as noise, hold the potential to provide direct insights into the material structure and its structure-stress coupling, uncovering detailed aspects of fluid transport and relaxation behaviors. Despite advancements in experimental techniques allowing for the visualization of these fluctuations, their significance remains largely untapped, as modeling efforts continue to target Newtonian fluids within the confines of Gaussian noise assumptions. In the present work a comparative analysis of stress fluctuations in two distinct microstructural models is carried out: the temporary network model and the dumbbell model. Despite both models conforming to the Upper Convected Maxwell Model at a macroscopic level, the temporary network model predicts non-Gaussian fluctuations. We find that stress fluctuations within the temporary network model exhibit more pronounced abruptness at local scale, with only an enlargement of the control volume leading to a gradual Gaussian-like noise, diminishing the differences between the two models. These findings underscore the heightened sensitivity of fluctuating rheology to microstructural details and the microstructure-flow coupling, beyond what is captured by macroscopically averaged stresses.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2404.19743
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2404_19743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3049793832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a953-31c7ef55a9b8d224b4d04948822c0180b527a68156f1bb4c97a8433c1caa3b933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9LwzAYxoMgOOY-gCcDnjuTvMmaeBvTqTD04PBakjTFzLapSTvdt7dznl54eP68_BC6omTOpRDkVscfv58zTvicqpzDGZowAJpJztgFmqW0I4SwRc6EgAnar0LT6ah7v3d42er6kHzCocLrerD9MOqhTdi3-N0nG1ytU-8tfuujS-kOL_Ep7lNoj6H-w-Gta7oQdTzgF9d_h_iJdVvi-6ExxtU1bkLp6nSJzitdJzf7v1O0XT9sV0_Z5vXxebXcZFoJyIDa3FVCaGVkyRg3vCRccSkZs4RKYgTL9UJSsaioMdyqXEsOYKnVGowCmKLrU-0flKKLvhkfK45wij84o-Pm5Ohi-Bpc6otdGOLIIRUwbuUKJDD4BTuraEI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3049793832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Fluctuations in Viscoelastic Stress: A Comparison of the Temporary Network and Dumbbell models</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Winters, Arturo ; Öttinger, Hans Christian ; Vermant, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Winters, Arturo ; Öttinger, Hans Christian ; Vermant, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Traditionally, stress fluctuations in flowing and deformed materials are overlooked, with an obvious focus on average stresses in a continuum mechanical approximation. However, these fluctuations, often dismissed as noise, hold the potential to provide direct insights into the material structure and its structure-stress coupling, uncovering detailed aspects of fluid transport and relaxation behaviors. Despite advancements in experimental techniques allowing for the visualization of these fluctuations, their significance remains largely untapped, as modeling efforts continue to target Newtonian fluids within the confines of Gaussian noise assumptions. In the present work a comparative analysis of stress fluctuations in two distinct microstructural models is carried out: the temporary network model and the dumbbell model. Despite both models conforming to the Upper Convected Maxwell Model at a macroscopic level, the temporary network model predicts non-Gaussian fluctuations. We find that stress fluctuations within the temporary network model exhibit more pronounced abruptness at local scale, with only an enlargement of the control volume leading to a gradual Gaussian-like noise, diminishing the differences between the two models. These findings underscore the heightened sensitivity of fluctuating rheology to microstructural details and the microstructure-flow coupling, beyond what is captured by macroscopically averaged stresses.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2404.19743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Coupling ; Microstructure ; Newtonian fluids ; Physics - Fluid Dynamics ; Physics - Materials Science ; Physics - Statistical Mechanics ; Random noise ; Rheological properties ; Rheology ; Stress analysis</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-04</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.19743$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0213660$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winters, Arturo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öttinger, Hans Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermant, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Fluctuations in Viscoelastic Stress: A Comparison of the Temporary Network and Dumbbell models</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Traditionally, stress fluctuations in flowing and deformed materials are overlooked, with an obvious focus on average stresses in a continuum mechanical approximation. However, these fluctuations, often dismissed as noise, hold the potential to provide direct insights into the material structure and its structure-stress coupling, uncovering detailed aspects of fluid transport and relaxation behaviors. Despite advancements in experimental techniques allowing for the visualization of these fluctuations, their significance remains largely untapped, as modeling efforts continue to target Newtonian fluids within the confines of Gaussian noise assumptions. In the present work a comparative analysis of stress fluctuations in two distinct microstructural models is carried out: the temporary network model and the dumbbell model. Despite both models conforming to the Upper Convected Maxwell Model at a macroscopic level, the temporary network model predicts non-Gaussian fluctuations. We find that stress fluctuations within the temporary network model exhibit more pronounced abruptness at local scale, with only an enlargement of the control volume leading to a gradual Gaussian-like noise, diminishing the differences between the two models. These findings underscore the heightened sensitivity of fluctuating rheology to microstructural details and the microstructure-flow coupling, beyond what is captured by macroscopically averaged stresses.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Newtonian fluids</subject><subject>Physics - Fluid Dynamics</subject><subject>Physics - Materials Science</subject><subject>Physics - Statistical Mechanics</subject><subject>Random noise</subject><subject>Rheological properties</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Stress analysis</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE9LwzAYxoMgOOY-gCcDnjuTvMmaeBvTqTD04PBakjTFzLapSTvdt7dznl54eP68_BC6omTOpRDkVscfv58zTvicqpzDGZowAJpJztgFmqW0I4SwRc6EgAnar0LT6ah7v3d42er6kHzCocLrerD9MOqhTdi3-N0nG1ytU-8tfuujS-kOL_Ep7lNoj6H-w-Gta7oQdTzgF9d_h_iJdVvi-6ExxtU1bkLp6nSJzitdJzf7v1O0XT9sV0_Z5vXxebXcZFoJyIDa3FVCaGVkyRg3vCRccSkZs4RKYgTL9UJSsaioMdyqXEsOYKnVGowCmKLrU-0flKKLvhkfK45wij84o-Pm5Ohi-Bpc6otdGOLIIRUwbuUKJDD4BTuraEI</recordid><startdate>20240430</startdate><enddate>20240430</enddate><creator>Winters, Arturo</creator><creator>Öttinger, Hans Christian</creator><creator>Vermant, Jan</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240430</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Fluctuations in Viscoelastic Stress: A Comparison of the Temporary Network and Dumbbell models</title><author>Winters, Arturo ; Öttinger, Hans Christian ; Vermant, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a953-31c7ef55a9b8d224b4d04948822c0180b527a68156f1bb4c97a8433c1caa3b933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Newtonian fluids</topic><topic>Physics - Fluid Dynamics</topic><topic>Physics - Materials Science</topic><topic>Physics - Statistical Mechanics</topic><topic>Random noise</topic><topic>Rheological properties</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Stress analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winters, Arturo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öttinger, Hans Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermant, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winters, Arturo</au><au>Öttinger, Hans Christian</au><au>Vermant, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Fluctuations in Viscoelastic Stress: A Comparison of the Temporary Network and Dumbbell models</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-04-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Traditionally, stress fluctuations in flowing and deformed materials are overlooked, with an obvious focus on average stresses in a continuum mechanical approximation. However, these fluctuations, often dismissed as noise, hold the potential to provide direct insights into the material structure and its structure-stress coupling, uncovering detailed aspects of fluid transport and relaxation behaviors. Despite advancements in experimental techniques allowing for the visualization of these fluctuations, their significance remains largely untapped, as modeling efforts continue to target Newtonian fluids within the confines of Gaussian noise assumptions. In the present work a comparative analysis of stress fluctuations in two distinct microstructural models is carried out: the temporary network model and the dumbbell model. Despite both models conforming to the Upper Convected Maxwell Model at a macroscopic level, the temporary network model predicts non-Gaussian fluctuations. We find that stress fluctuations within the temporary network model exhibit more pronounced abruptness at local scale, with only an enlargement of the control volume leading to a gradual Gaussian-like noise, diminishing the differences between the two models. These findings underscore the heightened sensitivity of fluctuating rheology to microstructural details and the microstructure-flow coupling, beyond what is captured by macroscopically averaged stresses.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2404.19743</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2024-04
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2404_19743
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Comparative analysis
Coupling
Microstructure
Newtonian fluids
Physics - Fluid Dynamics
Physics - Materials Science
Physics - Statistical Mechanics
Random noise
Rheological properties
Rheology
Stress analysis
title Comparative Analysis of Fluctuations in Viscoelastic Stress: A Comparison of the Temporary Network and Dumbbell models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Fluctuations%20in%20Viscoelastic%20Stress:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20the%20Temporary%20Network%20and%20Dumbbell%20models&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Winters,%20Arturo&rft.date=2024-04-30&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2404.19743&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E3049793832%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3049793832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true