Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots

As robots grow more and more integrated into numerous industries, it is critical to comprehend how humans respond to their failures. This paper systematically studies how trust dynamics and system design are affected by human responses to robot failures. The three-stage survey used in the study prov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Shill, Ponkoj Chandra, Hakim, Md. Azizul, Khan, Muhammad Jahanzeb, Anima, Bashira Akter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Shill, Ponkoj Chandra
Hakim, Md. Azizul
Khan, Muhammad Jahanzeb
Anima, Bashira Akter
description As robots grow more and more integrated into numerous industries, it is critical to comprehend how humans respond to their failures. This paper systematically studies how trust dynamics and system design are affected by human responses to robot failures. The three-stage survey used in the study provides a thorough understanding of human-robot interactions. While the second stage concentrates on interaction details, such as robot precision and error acknowledgment, the first stage collects demographic data and initial levels of trust. In the last phase, participants' perceptions are examined after the encounter, and trust dynamics, forgiveness, and propensity to suggest robotic technologies are evaluated. Results show that participants' trust in robotic technologies increased significantly when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations to participants and their willingness to suggest robots for activities in the future points to a favorable change in perception, emphasizing the role that direct engagement has in influencing trust dynamics. By providing useful advice for creating more sympathetic, responsive, and reliable robotic systems, the study advances the science of human-robot interaction and promotes a wider adoption of robotic technologies.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2403.14293
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2403_14293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2403_14293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a673-bdd45e5c295a09d2f0a4fd5434b16019980e0f107036365c8724d75113bde7dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzr1qwzAUQGEtHULaB8gUvYDdK13JskZj0sZgKITsRtYPGGKrSG7avH1o2ulsh4-QHYNS1FLCq0k_07XkArBkgmvcEDh-zWahJ2_sOsUl0zXSbrExJW9X2iz526dMQ4ozPcUxrvmZPAVzyf7lv1tyfjuc22PRf7x3bdMXplJYjM4J6aXlWhrQjgcwIjgpUIysAqZ1DR4CAwVYYSVtrbhwSjKGo_PKOdyS_d_2QR4-0zSbdBt-6cODjnf1Uj0T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Shill, Ponkoj Chandra ; Hakim, Md. Azizul ; Khan, Muhammad Jahanzeb ; Anima, Bashira Akter</creator><creatorcontrib>Shill, Ponkoj Chandra ; Hakim, Md. Azizul ; Khan, Muhammad Jahanzeb ; Anima, Bashira Akter</creatorcontrib><description>As robots grow more and more integrated into numerous industries, it is critical to comprehend how humans respond to their failures. This paper systematically studies how trust dynamics and system design are affected by human responses to robot failures. The three-stage survey used in the study provides a thorough understanding of human-robot interactions. While the second stage concentrates on interaction details, such as robot precision and error acknowledgment, the first stage collects demographic data and initial levels of trust. In the last phase, participants' perceptions are examined after the encounter, and trust dynamics, forgiveness, and propensity to suggest robotic technologies are evaluated. Results show that participants' trust in robotic technologies increased significantly when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations to participants and their willingness to suggest robots for activities in the future points to a favorable change in perception, emphasizing the role that direct engagement has in influencing trust dynamics. By providing useful advice for creating more sympathetic, responsive, and reliable robotic systems, the study advances the science of human-robot interaction and promotes a wider adoption of robotic technologies.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2403.14293</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction ; Computer Science - Robotics ; Computer Science - Software Engineering</subject><creationdate>2024-03</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14293$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.14293$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shill, Ponkoj Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakim, Md. Azizul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Jahanzeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anima, Bashira Akter</creatorcontrib><title>Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots</title><description>As robots grow more and more integrated into numerous industries, it is critical to comprehend how humans respond to their failures. This paper systematically studies how trust dynamics and system design are affected by human responses to robot failures. The three-stage survey used in the study provides a thorough understanding of human-robot interactions. While the second stage concentrates on interaction details, such as robot precision and error acknowledgment, the first stage collects demographic data and initial levels of trust. In the last phase, participants' perceptions are examined after the encounter, and trust dynamics, forgiveness, and propensity to suggest robotic technologies are evaluated. Results show that participants' trust in robotic technologies increased significantly when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations to participants and their willingness to suggest robots for activities in the future points to a favorable change in perception, emphasizing the role that direct engagement has in influencing trust dynamics. By providing useful advice for creating more sympathetic, responsive, and reliable robotic systems, the study advances the science of human-robot interaction and promotes a wider adoption of robotic technologies.</description><subject>Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction</subject><subject>Computer Science - Robotics</subject><subject>Computer Science - Software Engineering</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzr1qwzAUQGEtHULaB8gUvYDdK13JskZj0sZgKITsRtYPGGKrSG7avH1o2ulsh4-QHYNS1FLCq0k_07XkArBkgmvcEDh-zWahJ2_sOsUl0zXSbrExJW9X2iz526dMQ4ozPcUxrvmZPAVzyf7lv1tyfjuc22PRf7x3bdMXplJYjM4J6aXlWhrQjgcwIjgpUIysAqZ1DR4CAwVYYSVtrbhwSjKGo_PKOdyS_d_2QR4-0zSbdBt-6cODjnf1Uj0T</recordid><startdate>20240321</startdate><enddate>20240321</enddate><creator>Shill, Ponkoj Chandra</creator><creator>Hakim, Md. Azizul</creator><creator>Khan, Muhammad Jahanzeb</creator><creator>Anima, Bashira Akter</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240321</creationdate><title>Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots</title><author>Shill, Ponkoj Chandra ; Hakim, Md. Azizul ; Khan, Muhammad Jahanzeb ; Anima, Bashira Akter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a673-bdd45e5c295a09d2f0a4fd5434b16019980e0f107036365c8724d75113bde7dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction</topic><topic>Computer Science - Robotics</topic><topic>Computer Science - Software Engineering</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shill, Ponkoj Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakim, Md. Azizul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Jahanzeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anima, Bashira Akter</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shill, Ponkoj Chandra</au><au>Hakim, Md. Azizul</au><au>Khan, Muhammad Jahanzeb</au><au>Anima, Bashira Akter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots</atitle><date>2024-03-21</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>As robots grow more and more integrated into numerous industries, it is critical to comprehend how humans respond to their failures. This paper systematically studies how trust dynamics and system design are affected by human responses to robot failures. The three-stage survey used in the study provides a thorough understanding of human-robot interactions. While the second stage concentrates on interaction details, such as robot precision and error acknowledgment, the first stage collects demographic data and initial levels of trust. In the last phase, participants' perceptions are examined after the encounter, and trust dynamics, forgiveness, and propensity to suggest robotic technologies are evaluated. Results show that participants' trust in robotic technologies increased significantly when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations to participants and their willingness to suggest robots for activities in the future points to a favorable change in perception, emphasizing the role that direct engagement has in influencing trust dynamics. By providing useful advice for creating more sympathetic, responsive, and reliable robotic systems, the study advances the science of human-robot interaction and promotes a wider adoption of robotic technologies.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2403.14293</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2403.14293
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2403_14293
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction
Computer Science - Robotics
Computer Science - Software Engineering
title Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T00%3A25%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20Reactions%20to%20Incorrect%20Answers%20from%20Robots&rft.au=Shill,%20Ponkoj%20Chandra&rft.date=2024-03-21&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2403.14293&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2403_14293%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true