Formulation Comparison for Timeline Construction using LLMs

Constructing a timeline requires identifying the chronological order of events in an article. In prior timeline construction datasets, temporal orders are typically annotated by either event-to-time anchoring or event-to-event pairwise ordering, both of which suffer from missing temporal information...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hasegawa, Kimihiro, Kandukuri, Nikhil, Holm, Susan, Yamakawa, Yukari, Mitamura, Teruko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Hasegawa, Kimihiro
Kandukuri, Nikhil
Holm, Susan
Yamakawa, Yukari
Mitamura, Teruko
description Constructing a timeline requires identifying the chronological order of events in an article. In prior timeline construction datasets, temporal orders are typically annotated by either event-to-time anchoring or event-to-event pairwise ordering, both of which suffer from missing temporal information. To mitigate the issue, we develop a new evaluation dataset, TimeSET, consisting of single-document timelines with document-level order annotation. TimeSET features saliency-based event selection and partial ordering, which enable a practical annotation workload. Aiming to build better automatic timeline construction systems, we propose a novel evaluation framework to compare multiple task formulations with TimeSET by prompting open LLMs, i.e., Llama 2 and Flan-T5. Considering that identifying temporal orders of events is a core subtask in timeline construction, we further benchmark open LLMs on existing event temporal ordering datasets to gain a robust understanding of their capabilities. Our experiments show that (1) NLI formulation with Flan-T5 demonstrates a strong performance among others, while (2) timeline construction and event temporal ordering are still challenging tasks for few-shot LLMs. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/kimihiroh/timeset.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2403.00990
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2403_00990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2403_00990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a670-bec095e11da428214f56a321929edc8be11d44153c1e8ea663b9c0b45d4ea1bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotT0tqwzAU1KaLkvYAXcUXsPP0cyy6KqZpCg7ZeG-e5Ocg8CdIcWhv38TpaoaZYZhh7I1DpgqtYYPhx18zoUBmAMbAM3vfTWGYe7z4aUzKaThj8PFGuykktR-o9yPd9DFewuyW0Bz9eEqq6hBf2FOHfaTXf1yxevdZl_u0On59lx9VivkWUksOjCbOW1SiEFx1OkcpuBGGWlfYu6MU19JxKgjzXFrjwCrdKkJuO7li60ftsr45Bz9g-G3uL5rlhfwDxI1CcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formulation Comparison for Timeline Construction using LLMs</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Hasegawa, Kimihiro ; Kandukuri, Nikhil ; Holm, Susan ; Yamakawa, Yukari ; Mitamura, Teruko</creator><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Kimihiro ; Kandukuri, Nikhil ; Holm, Susan ; Yamakawa, Yukari ; Mitamura, Teruko</creatorcontrib><description>Constructing a timeline requires identifying the chronological order of events in an article. In prior timeline construction datasets, temporal orders are typically annotated by either event-to-time anchoring or event-to-event pairwise ordering, both of which suffer from missing temporal information. To mitigate the issue, we develop a new evaluation dataset, TimeSET, consisting of single-document timelines with document-level order annotation. TimeSET features saliency-based event selection and partial ordering, which enable a practical annotation workload. Aiming to build better automatic timeline construction systems, we propose a novel evaluation framework to compare multiple task formulations with TimeSET by prompting open LLMs, i.e., Llama 2 and Flan-T5. Considering that identifying temporal orders of events is a core subtask in timeline construction, we further benchmark open LLMs on existing event temporal ordering datasets to gain a robust understanding of their capabilities. Our experiments show that (1) NLI formulation with Flan-T5 demonstrates a strong performance among others, while (2) timeline construction and event temporal ordering are still challenging tasks for few-shot LLMs. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/kimihiroh/timeset.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2403.00990</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><creationdate>2024-03</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00990$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.00990$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Kimihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandukuri, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holm, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamakawa, Yukari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitamura, Teruko</creatorcontrib><title>Formulation Comparison for Timeline Construction using LLMs</title><description>Constructing a timeline requires identifying the chronological order of events in an article. In prior timeline construction datasets, temporal orders are typically annotated by either event-to-time anchoring or event-to-event pairwise ordering, both of which suffer from missing temporal information. To mitigate the issue, we develop a new evaluation dataset, TimeSET, consisting of single-document timelines with document-level order annotation. TimeSET features saliency-based event selection and partial ordering, which enable a practical annotation workload. Aiming to build better automatic timeline construction systems, we propose a novel evaluation framework to compare multiple task formulations with TimeSET by prompting open LLMs, i.e., Llama 2 and Flan-T5. Considering that identifying temporal orders of events is a core subtask in timeline construction, we further benchmark open LLMs on existing event temporal ordering datasets to gain a robust understanding of their capabilities. Our experiments show that (1) NLI formulation with Flan-T5 demonstrates a strong performance among others, while (2) timeline construction and event temporal ordering are still challenging tasks for few-shot LLMs. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/kimihiroh/timeset.</description><subject>Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotT0tqwzAU1KaLkvYAXcUXsPP0cyy6KqZpCg7ZeG-e5Ocg8CdIcWhv38TpaoaZYZhh7I1DpgqtYYPhx18zoUBmAMbAM3vfTWGYe7z4aUzKaThj8PFGuykktR-o9yPd9DFewuyW0Bz9eEqq6hBf2FOHfaTXf1yxevdZl_u0On59lx9VivkWUksOjCbOW1SiEFx1OkcpuBGGWlfYu6MU19JxKgjzXFrjwCrdKkJuO7li60ftsr45Bz9g-G3uL5rlhfwDxI1CcQ</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Hasegawa, Kimihiro</creator><creator>Kandukuri, Nikhil</creator><creator>Holm, Susan</creator><creator>Yamakawa, Yukari</creator><creator>Mitamura, Teruko</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Formulation Comparison for Timeline Construction using LLMs</title><author>Hasegawa, Kimihiro ; Kandukuri, Nikhil ; Holm, Susan ; Yamakawa, Yukari ; Mitamura, Teruko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a670-bec095e11da428214f56a321929edc8be11d44153c1e8ea663b9c0b45d4ea1bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Computation and Language</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Kimihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandukuri, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holm, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamakawa, Yukari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitamura, Teruko</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hasegawa, Kimihiro</au><au>Kandukuri, Nikhil</au><au>Holm, Susan</au><au>Yamakawa, Yukari</au><au>Mitamura, Teruko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formulation Comparison for Timeline Construction using LLMs</atitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Constructing a timeline requires identifying the chronological order of events in an article. In prior timeline construction datasets, temporal orders are typically annotated by either event-to-time anchoring or event-to-event pairwise ordering, both of which suffer from missing temporal information. To mitigate the issue, we develop a new evaluation dataset, TimeSET, consisting of single-document timelines with document-level order annotation. TimeSET features saliency-based event selection and partial ordering, which enable a practical annotation workload. Aiming to build better automatic timeline construction systems, we propose a novel evaluation framework to compare multiple task formulations with TimeSET by prompting open LLMs, i.e., Llama 2 and Flan-T5. Considering that identifying temporal orders of events is a core subtask in timeline construction, we further benchmark open LLMs on existing event temporal ordering datasets to gain a robust understanding of their capabilities. Our experiments show that (1) NLI formulation with Flan-T5 demonstrates a strong performance among others, while (2) timeline construction and event temporal ordering are still challenging tasks for few-shot LLMs. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/kimihiroh/timeset.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2403.00990</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2403.00990
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2403_00990
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Computation and Language
title Formulation Comparison for Timeline Construction using LLMs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A30%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formulation%20Comparison%20for%20Timeline%20Construction%20using%20LLMs&rft.au=Hasegawa,%20Kimihiro&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2403.00990&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2403_00990%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true