Comment on a no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models

Comment on a no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models

In a recent paper [Carcassi, Oldofredi and Aidala, Found Phys 54, 14 (2024)] it is claimed that the whole Harrigan--Spekkens framework of ontological models is inconsistent with quantum theory. They show this by showing that all pure quantum states in $\psi$-ontic models must be orthogonal. In this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Walleghem, Laurens, Khanna, Shashaank, Bhavsar, Rutvij
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Physics - Quantum Physics
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Walleghem, Laurens
Khanna, Shashaank
Bhavsar, Rutvij
description In a recent paper [Carcassi, Oldofredi and Aidala, Found Phys 54, 14 (2024)] it is claimed that the whole Harrigan--Spekkens framework of ontological models is inconsistent with quantum theory. They show this by showing that all pure quantum states in $\psi$-ontic models must be orthogonal. In this note, we identify some crucial mistakes in their argument to the extent that the main claim is incorrect.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2402.13140
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2402_13140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2402_13140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a670-886d175edf860909851cdb4467c0a4f4a3603bed6b6d1b7cda78a8403b2953e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzr1qwzAUBWAtGUKaB8hUDVnlXFm_HoNp0kKgQzMGzLUlt4bIMrIp6dvXSTsdOBwOHyEbDpm0SsEO0637znIJecYFl7AkeRlD8P1EY0-R9pF9Rjp9-Zh8oG1MdHsZxm7LYj91DQ3R-ev4RBYtXke__s8V-Ti8nMtXdno_vpX7E0NtgFmrHTfKu9ZqKKCwijeullKbBlC2EoUGUXun63lXm8ahsWjl3OWFEl6syPPf68NcDakLmH6qu7162MUvwl89Bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on a no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Walleghem, Laurens ; Khanna, Shashaank ; Bhavsar, Rutvij</creator><creatorcontrib>Walleghem, Laurens ; Khanna, Shashaank ; Bhavsar, Rutvij</creatorcontrib><description>In a recent paper [Carcassi, Oldofredi and Aidala, Found Phys 54, 14 (2024)] it is claimed that the whole Harrigan--Spekkens framework of ontological models is inconsistent with quantum theory. They show this by showing that all pure quantum states in $\psi$-ontic models must be orthogonal. In this note, we identify some crucial mistakes in their argument to the extent that the main claim is incorrect.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2402.13140</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Physics - Quantum Physics</subject><creationdate>2024-02</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13140$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.13140$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walleghem, Laurens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Shashaank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavsar, Rutvij</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on a no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models</title><description>In a recent paper [Carcassi, Oldofredi and Aidala, Found Phys 54, 14 (2024)] it is claimed that the whole Harrigan--Spekkens framework of ontological models is inconsistent with quantum theory. They show this by showing that all pure quantum states in $\psi$-ontic models must be orthogonal. In this note, we identify some crucial mistakes in their argument to the extent that the main claim is incorrect.</description><subject>Physics - Quantum Physics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzr1qwzAUBWAtGUKaB8hUDVnlXFm_HoNp0kKgQzMGzLUlt4bIMrIp6dvXSTsdOBwOHyEbDpm0SsEO0637znIJecYFl7AkeRlD8P1EY0-R9pF9Rjp9-Zh8oG1MdHsZxm7LYj91DQ3R-ev4RBYtXke__s8V-Ti8nMtXdno_vpX7E0NtgFmrHTfKu9ZqKKCwijeullKbBlC2EoUGUXun63lXm8ahsWjl3OWFEl6syPPf68NcDakLmH6qu7162MUvwl89Bw</recordid><startdate>20240220</startdate><enddate>20240220</enddate><creator>Walleghem, Laurens</creator><creator>Khanna, Shashaank</creator><creator>Bhavsar, Rutvij</creator><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240220</creationdate><title>Comment on a no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models</title><author>Walleghem, Laurens ; Khanna, Shashaank ; Bhavsar, Rutvij</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a670-886d175edf860909851cdb4467c0a4f4a3603bed6b6d1b7cda78a8403b2953e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Physics - Quantum Physics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walleghem, Laurens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Shashaank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavsar, Rutvij</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walleghem, Laurens</au><au>Khanna, Shashaank</au><au>Bhavsar, Rutvij</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on a no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models</atitle><date>2024-02-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>In a recent paper [Carcassi, Oldofredi and Aidala, Found Phys 54, 14 (2024)] it is claimed that the whole Harrigan--Spekkens framework of ontological models is inconsistent with quantum theory. They show this by showing that all pure quantum states in $\psi$-ontic models must be orthogonal. In this note, we identify some crucial mistakes in their argument to the extent that the main claim is incorrect.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2402.13140</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2402.13140
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2402_13140
source arXiv.org
subjects Physics - Quantum Physics
title Comment on a no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T11%3A53%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20a%20no-go%20theorem%20for%20$%5Cpsi$-ontic%20models&rft.au=Walleghem,%20Laurens&rft.date=2024-02-20&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2402.13140&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2402_13140%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true