Hybrid Quantum Solvers in Production: how to succeed in the NISQ era?

Hybrid Quantum Solvers in Production: how to succeed in the NISQ era?

Hybrid quantum computing is considered the present and the future within the field of quantum computing. Far from being a passing fad, this trend cannot be considered just a stopgap to address the limitations of NISQ-era devices. The foundations linking both computing paradigms will remain robust ov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Osaba, Eneko, Villar-Rodriguez, Esther, Gomez-Tejedor, Aitor, Oregi, Izaskun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Computer Science - Emerging Technologies
Physics - Quantum Physics
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Osaba, Eneko
Villar-Rodriguez, Esther
Gomez-Tejedor, Aitor
Oregi, Izaskun
description Hybrid quantum computing is considered the present and the future within the field of quantum computing. Far from being a passing fad, this trend cannot be considered just a stopgap to address the limitations of NISQ-era devices. The foundations linking both computing paradigms will remain robust over time. The contribution of this work is twofold: first, we describe and categorize some of the most frequently used hybrid solvers, resorting to two different taxonomies recently published in the literature. Secondly, we put a special focus on two solvers that are currently deployed in real production and that have demonstrated to be near the real industry. These solvers are the LeapHybridBQMSampler contained in D-Wave's Hybrid Solver Service and Quantagonia's Hybrid Solver. We analyze the performance of both methods using as benchmarks four combinatorial optimization problems.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2401.10302
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2401_10302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2401_10302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-1f1ca63726c108653d5adae72a3ca0ebdfd8a6a1a392de00ab36a9a2ae6b74f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz8FqwkAUheHZdFGsD9BV7wskvTOTTGI3pYitgmhF9-Fm5gYHNCOTxNa3L1pXZ_HDgU-IZ4lpVuY5vlL89edUZShTiRrVo5jNL3X0DjYDtf1whG04nDl24Fv4jsENtvehfYN9-IE-QDdYy-yutd8zrBbbDXCk9yfx0NCh4_F9R2L3OdtN58ly_bWYfiwTMoVKZCMtGV0oYyWWJtcuJ0dcKNKWkGvXuJIMSdIT5RiRam1oQorY1EXWZHokXv5vb47qFP2R4qW6eqqbR_8BMXVFSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hybrid Quantum Solvers in Production: how to succeed in the NISQ era?</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Osaba, Eneko ; Villar-Rodriguez, Esther ; Gomez-Tejedor, Aitor ; Oregi, Izaskun</creator><creatorcontrib>Osaba, Eneko ; Villar-Rodriguez, Esther ; Gomez-Tejedor, Aitor ; Oregi, Izaskun</creatorcontrib><description>Hybrid quantum computing is considered the present and the future within the field of quantum computing. Far from being a passing fad, this trend cannot be considered just a stopgap to address the limitations of NISQ-era devices. The foundations linking both computing paradigms will remain robust over time. The contribution of this work is twofold: first, we describe and categorize some of the most frequently used hybrid solvers, resorting to two different taxonomies recently published in the literature. Secondly, we put a special focus on two solvers that are currently deployed in real production and that have demonstrated to be near the real industry. These solvers are the LeapHybridBQMSampler contained in D-Wave's Hybrid Solver Service and Quantagonia's Hybrid Solver. We analyze the performance of both methods using as benchmarks four combinatorial optimization problems.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2401.10302</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Emerging Technologies ; Physics - Quantum Physics</subject><creationdate>2024-01</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,781,886</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10302$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.10302$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osaba, Eneko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villar-Rodriguez, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Tejedor, Aitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oregi, Izaskun</creatorcontrib><title>Hybrid Quantum Solvers in Production: how to succeed in the NISQ era?</title><description>Hybrid quantum computing is considered the present and the future within the field of quantum computing. Far from being a passing fad, this trend cannot be considered just a stopgap to address the limitations of NISQ-era devices. The foundations linking both computing paradigms will remain robust over time. The contribution of this work is twofold: first, we describe and categorize some of the most frequently used hybrid solvers, resorting to two different taxonomies recently published in the literature. Secondly, we put a special focus on two solvers that are currently deployed in real production and that have demonstrated to be near the real industry. These solvers are the LeapHybridBQMSampler contained in D-Wave's Hybrid Solver Service and Quantagonia's Hybrid Solver. We analyze the performance of both methods using as benchmarks four combinatorial optimization problems.</description><subject>Computer Science - Emerging Technologies</subject><subject>Physics - Quantum Physics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotz8FqwkAUheHZdFGsD9BV7wskvTOTTGI3pYitgmhF9-Fm5gYHNCOTxNa3L1pXZ_HDgU-IZ4lpVuY5vlL89edUZShTiRrVo5jNL3X0DjYDtf1whG04nDl24Fv4jsENtvehfYN9-IE-QDdYy-yutd8zrBbbDXCk9yfx0NCh4_F9R2L3OdtN58ly_bWYfiwTMoVKZCMtGV0oYyWWJtcuJ0dcKNKWkGvXuJIMSdIT5RiRam1oQorY1EXWZHokXv5vb47qFP2R4qW6eqqbR_8BMXVFSQ</recordid><startdate>20240118</startdate><enddate>20240118</enddate><creator>Osaba, Eneko</creator><creator>Villar-Rodriguez, Esther</creator><creator>Gomez-Tejedor, Aitor</creator><creator>Oregi, Izaskun</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240118</creationdate><title>Hybrid Quantum Solvers in Production: how to succeed in the NISQ era?</title><author>Osaba, Eneko ; Villar-Rodriguez, Esther ; Gomez-Tejedor, Aitor ; Oregi, Izaskun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-1f1ca63726c108653d5adae72a3ca0ebdfd8a6a1a392de00ab36a9a2ae6b74f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Emerging Technologies</topic><topic>Physics - Quantum Physics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osaba, Eneko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villar-Rodriguez, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Tejedor, Aitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oregi, Izaskun</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osaba, Eneko</au><au>Villar-Rodriguez, Esther</au><au>Gomez-Tejedor, Aitor</au><au>Oregi, Izaskun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hybrid Quantum Solvers in Production: how to succeed in the NISQ era?</atitle><date>2024-01-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Hybrid quantum computing is considered the present and the future within the field of quantum computing. Far from being a passing fad, this trend cannot be considered just a stopgap to address the limitations of NISQ-era devices. The foundations linking both computing paradigms will remain robust over time. The contribution of this work is twofold: first, we describe and categorize some of the most frequently used hybrid solvers, resorting to two different taxonomies recently published in the literature. Secondly, we put a special focus on two solvers that are currently deployed in real production and that have demonstrated to be near the real industry. These solvers are the LeapHybridBQMSampler contained in D-Wave's Hybrid Solver Service and Quantagonia's Hybrid Solver. We analyze the performance of both methods using as benchmarks four combinatorial optimization problems.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2401.10302</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2401.10302
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2401_10302
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Emerging Technologies
Physics - Quantum Physics
title Hybrid Quantum Solvers in Production: how to succeed in the NISQ era?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T23%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hybrid%20Quantum%20Solvers%20in%20Production:%20how%20to%20succeed%20in%20the%20NISQ%20era?&rft.au=Osaba,%20Eneko&rft.date=2024-01-18&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2401.10302&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2401_10302%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true