On the Impact of CDL and TDL Augmentation for RF Fingerprinting under Impaired Channels
Cyber-physical systems have recently been used in several areas (such as connected and autonomous vehicles) due to their high maneuverability. On the other hand, they are susceptible to cyber-attacks. Radio frequency (RF) fingerprinting emerges as a promising approach. This work aims to analyze the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2023-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Omer Melih Gul Kulhandjian, Michel Kantarci, Burak D'Amours, Claude Touazi, Azzedine Ellement, Cliff |
description | Cyber-physical systems have recently been used in several areas (such as connected and autonomous vehicles) due to their high maneuverability. On the other hand, they are susceptible to cyber-attacks. Radio frequency (RF) fingerprinting emerges as a promising approach. This work aims to analyze the impact of decoupling tapped delay line and clustered delay line (TDL+CDL) augmentation-driven deep learning (DL) on transmitter-specific fingerprints to discriminate malicious users from legitimate ones. This work also considers 5G-only-CDL, WiFi-only-TDL augmentation approaches. RF fingerprinting models are sensitive to changing channels and environmental conditions. For this reason, they should be considered during the deployment of a DL model. Data acquisition can be another option. Nonetheless, gathering samples under various conditions for a train set formation may be quite hard. Consequently, data acquisition may not be feasible. This work uses a dataset that includes 5G, 4G, and WiFi samples, and it empowers a CDL+TDL-based augmentation technique in order to boost the learning performance of the DL model. Numerical results show that CDL+TDL, 5G-only-CDL, and WiFi-only-TDL augmentation approaches achieve 87.59%, 81.63%, 79.21% accuracy on unobserved data while TDL/CDL augmentation technique and no augmentation approach result in 77.81% and 74.84% accuracy on unobserved data, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2312.06555 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2312_06555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2900744403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a955-f069e57fc911b7811c65c42a698d5a8bf58766c85e6b067c00e24af62b26c7303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LAzEYhIMgWGp_gCcDnre--XiT7LGsVguFghQ8Ltls0m5pszW7K_rvXaunmcPMMA8hdwzm0iDCo01fzeecC8bnoBDxiky4ECwzkvMbMuu6AwBwpTmimJD3TaT93tPV6WxdT9tAi6c1tbGm21EXw-7kY2_7po00tIm-LemyiTufzqmJ_ejoEGufLvUm-ZoWexujP3a35DrYY-dn_zol2-XztnjN1puXVbFYZzZHzAKo3KMOLmes0oYxp9BJblVuarSmCmi0Us6gVxUo7QA8lzYoXnHltAAxJfd_sxfqcnx1sum7_KUvL_Rj4uEvcU7tx-C7vjy0Q4rjp5LnAFpKCUL8AImwWvk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900744403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Impact of CDL and TDL Augmentation for RF Fingerprinting under Impaired Channels</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Omer Melih Gul ; Kulhandjian, Michel ; Kantarci, Burak ; D'Amours, Claude ; Touazi, Azzedine ; Ellement, Cliff</creator><creatorcontrib>Omer Melih Gul ; Kulhandjian, Michel ; Kantarci, Burak ; D'Amours, Claude ; Touazi, Azzedine ; Ellement, Cliff</creatorcontrib><description>Cyber-physical systems have recently been used in several areas (such as connected and autonomous vehicles) due to their high maneuverability. On the other hand, they are susceptible to cyber-attacks. Radio frequency (RF) fingerprinting emerges as a promising approach. This work aims to analyze the impact of decoupling tapped delay line and clustered delay line (TDL+CDL) augmentation-driven deep learning (DL) on transmitter-specific fingerprints to discriminate malicious users from legitimate ones. This work also considers 5G-only-CDL, WiFi-only-TDL augmentation approaches. RF fingerprinting models are sensitive to changing channels and environmental conditions. For this reason, they should be considered during the deployment of a DL model. Data acquisition can be another option. Nonetheless, gathering samples under various conditions for a train set formation may be quite hard. Consequently, data acquisition may not be feasible. This work uses a dataset that includes 5G, 4G, and WiFi samples, and it empowers a CDL+TDL-based augmentation technique in order to boost the learning performance of the DL model. Numerical results show that CDL+TDL, 5G-only-CDL, and WiFi-only-TDL augmentation approaches achieve 87.59%, 81.63%, 79.21% accuracy on unobserved data while TDL/CDL augmentation technique and no augmentation approach result in 77.81% and 74.84% accuracy on unobserved data, respectively.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2312.06555</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>5G mobile communication ; Accuracy ; Channels ; Computer Science - Cryptography and Security ; Computer Science - Systems and Control ; Cyber-physical systems ; Cybersecurity ; Data acquisition ; Data augmentation ; Decoupling ; Deep learning ; Delay lines ; Fingerprinting ; Impact analysis ; Radio frequency</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-12</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,778,782,883,27914</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.06555$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.13052/2794-7254.006$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omer Melih Gul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulhandjian, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantarci, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Amours, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Touazi, Azzedine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellement, Cliff</creatorcontrib><title>On the Impact of CDL and TDL Augmentation for RF Fingerprinting under Impaired Channels</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Cyber-physical systems have recently been used in several areas (such as connected and autonomous vehicles) due to their high maneuverability. On the other hand, they are susceptible to cyber-attacks. Radio frequency (RF) fingerprinting emerges as a promising approach. This work aims to analyze the impact of decoupling tapped delay line and clustered delay line (TDL+CDL) augmentation-driven deep learning (DL) on transmitter-specific fingerprints to discriminate malicious users from legitimate ones. This work also considers 5G-only-CDL, WiFi-only-TDL augmentation approaches. RF fingerprinting models are sensitive to changing channels and environmental conditions. For this reason, they should be considered during the deployment of a DL model. Data acquisition can be another option. Nonetheless, gathering samples under various conditions for a train set formation may be quite hard. Consequently, data acquisition may not be feasible. This work uses a dataset that includes 5G, 4G, and WiFi samples, and it empowers a CDL+TDL-based augmentation technique in order to boost the learning performance of the DL model. Numerical results show that CDL+TDL, 5G-only-CDL, and WiFi-only-TDL augmentation approaches achieve 87.59%, 81.63%, 79.21% accuracy on unobserved data while TDL/CDL augmentation technique and no augmentation approach result in 77.81% and 74.84% accuracy on unobserved data, respectively.</description><subject>5G mobile communication</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security</subject><subject>Computer Science - Systems and Control</subject><subject>Cyber-physical systems</subject><subject>Cybersecurity</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>Data augmentation</subject><subject>Decoupling</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Delay lines</subject><subject>Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LAzEYhIMgWGp_gCcDnre--XiT7LGsVguFghQ8Ltls0m5pszW7K_rvXaunmcPMMA8hdwzm0iDCo01fzeecC8bnoBDxiky4ECwzkvMbMuu6AwBwpTmimJD3TaT93tPV6WxdT9tAi6c1tbGm21EXw-7kY2_7po00tIm-LemyiTufzqmJ_ejoEGufLvUm-ZoWexujP3a35DrYY-dn_zol2-XztnjN1puXVbFYZzZHzAKo3KMOLmes0oYxp9BJblVuarSmCmi0Us6gVxUo7QA8lzYoXnHltAAxJfd_sxfqcnx1sum7_KUvL_Rj4uEvcU7tx-C7vjy0Q4rjp5LnAFpKCUL8AImwWvk</recordid><startdate>20231211</startdate><enddate>20231211</enddate><creator>Omer Melih Gul</creator><creator>Kulhandjian, Michel</creator><creator>Kantarci, Burak</creator><creator>D'Amours, Claude</creator><creator>Touazi, Azzedine</creator><creator>Ellement, Cliff</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231211</creationdate><title>On the Impact of CDL and TDL Augmentation for RF Fingerprinting under Impaired Channels</title><author>Omer Melih Gul ; Kulhandjian, Michel ; Kantarci, Burak ; D'Amours, Claude ; Touazi, Azzedine ; Ellement, Cliff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a955-f069e57fc911b7811c65c42a698d5a8bf58766c85e6b067c00e24af62b26c7303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>5G mobile communication</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security</topic><topic>Computer Science - Systems and Control</topic><topic>Cyber-physical systems</topic><topic>Cybersecurity</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>Data augmentation</topic><topic>Decoupling</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Delay lines</topic><topic>Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omer Melih Gul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulhandjian, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantarci, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Amours, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Touazi, Azzedine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellement, Cliff</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omer Melih Gul</au><au>Kulhandjian, Michel</au><au>Kantarci, Burak</au><au>D'Amours, Claude</au><au>Touazi, Azzedine</au><au>Ellement, Cliff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Impact of CDL and TDL Augmentation for RF Fingerprinting under Impaired Channels</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-12-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Cyber-physical systems have recently been used in several areas (such as connected and autonomous vehicles) due to their high maneuverability. On the other hand, they are susceptible to cyber-attacks. Radio frequency (RF) fingerprinting emerges as a promising approach. This work aims to analyze the impact of decoupling tapped delay line and clustered delay line (TDL+CDL) augmentation-driven deep learning (DL) on transmitter-specific fingerprints to discriminate malicious users from legitimate ones. This work also considers 5G-only-CDL, WiFi-only-TDL augmentation approaches. RF fingerprinting models are sensitive to changing channels and environmental conditions. For this reason, they should be considered during the deployment of a DL model. Data acquisition can be another option. Nonetheless, gathering samples under various conditions for a train set formation may be quite hard. Consequently, data acquisition may not be feasible. This work uses a dataset that includes 5G, 4G, and WiFi samples, and it empowers a CDL+TDL-based augmentation technique in order to boost the learning performance of the DL model. Numerical results show that CDL+TDL, 5G-only-CDL, and WiFi-only-TDL augmentation approaches achieve 87.59%, 81.63%, 79.21% accuracy on unobserved data while TDL/CDL augmentation technique and no augmentation approach result in 77.81% and 74.84% accuracy on unobserved data, respectively.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2312.06555</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2023-12 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2312_06555 |
source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
subjects | 5G mobile communication Accuracy Channels Computer Science - Cryptography and Security Computer Science - Systems and Control Cyber-physical systems Cybersecurity Data acquisition Data augmentation Decoupling Deep learning Delay lines Fingerprinting Impact analysis Radio frequency |
title | On the Impact of CDL and TDL Augmentation for RF Fingerprinting under Impaired Channels |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A23%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Impact%20of%20CDL%20and%20TDL%20Augmentation%20for%20RF%20Fingerprinting%20under%20Impaired%20Channels&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Omer%20Melih%20Gul&rft.date=2023-12-11&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2312.06555&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2900744403%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900744403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |