Feature Extraction for Generative Medical Imaging Evaluation: New Evidence Against an Evolving Trend
Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) is a widely used metric for assessing synthetic image quality. It relies on an ImageNet-based feature extractor, making its applicability to medical imaging unclear. A recent trend is to adapt FID to medical imaging through feature extractors trained on medical image...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2024-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Woodland, McKell Castelo, Austin Mais Al Taie Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva Eltaher, Mohamed Mohn, Frank Shieh, Alexander Kundu, Suprateek Yung, Joshua P Patel, Ankit B Brock, Kristy K |
description | Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) is a widely used metric for assessing synthetic image quality. It relies on an ImageNet-based feature extractor, making its applicability to medical imaging unclear. A recent trend is to adapt FID to medical imaging through feature extractors trained on medical images. Our study challenges this practice by demonstrating that ImageNet-based extractors are more consistent and aligned with human judgment than their RadImageNet counterparts. We evaluated sixteen StyleGAN2 networks across four medical imaging modalities and four data augmentation techniques with Fréchet distances (FDs) computed using eleven ImageNet or RadImageNet-trained feature extractors. Comparison with human judgment via visual Turing tests revealed that ImageNet-based extractors produced rankings consistent with human judgment, with the FD derived from the ImageNet-trained SwAV extractor significantly correlating with expert evaluations. In contrast, RadImageNet-based rankings were volatile and inconsistent with human judgment. Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions, providing novel evidence that medical image-trained feature extractors do not inherently improve FDs and can even compromise their reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/mckellwoodland/fid-med-eval. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2311.13717 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2311_13717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2894160196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a526-f72336481743048779597dff3802b9ae41c411734e6e341b4aac8461981292083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1rwkAURYdCoWL9AV11oOvYeTOTzKQ7EbWCbTfuwzN5kZE4sZOP2n_fqF1d3uXwuBzGnkBMtY1j8Yrh7PqpVABTUAbMHRtJpSCyWsoHNmmagxBCJkbGsRqxYknYdoH44twGzFtXe17Wga_IU8DW9cQ_qHA5Vnx9xL3ze77oserwQr7xT_oZbleQz4nP9uh803L0Q1dX_QXeBvLFI7svsWpo8p9jtl0utvP3aPO1Ws9nmwhjmUSlGXYm2oLRSmhrTBqnpihLZYXcpUgacg1glKaElIadRsytTiC1IFMprBqz59vbq4LsFNwRw292UZFdVQzEy404hfq7o6bNDnUX_LApkzbVkAhIE_UHzR1fnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2894160196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feature Extraction for Generative Medical Imaging Evaluation: New Evidence Against an Evolving Trend</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Woodland, McKell ; Castelo, Austin ; Mais Al Taie ; Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva ; Eltaher, Mohamed ; Mohn, Frank ; Shieh, Alexander ; Kundu, Suprateek ; Yung, Joshua P ; Patel, Ankit B ; Brock, Kristy K</creator><creatorcontrib>Woodland, McKell ; Castelo, Austin ; Mais Al Taie ; Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva ; Eltaher, Mohamed ; Mohn, Frank ; Shieh, Alexander ; Kundu, Suprateek ; Yung, Joshua P ; Patel, Ankit B ; Brock, Kristy K</creatorcontrib><description>Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) is a widely used metric for assessing synthetic image quality. It relies on an ImageNet-based feature extractor, making its applicability to medical imaging unclear. A recent trend is to adapt FID to medical imaging through feature extractors trained on medical images. Our study challenges this practice by demonstrating that ImageNet-based extractors are more consistent and aligned with human judgment than their RadImageNet counterparts. We evaluated sixteen StyleGAN2 networks across four medical imaging modalities and four data augmentation techniques with Fréchet distances (FDs) computed using eleven ImageNet or RadImageNet-trained feature extractors. Comparison with human judgment via visual Turing tests revealed that ImageNet-based extractors produced rankings consistent with human judgment, with the FD derived from the ImageNet-trained SwAV extractor significantly correlating with expert evaluations. In contrast, RadImageNet-based rankings were volatile and inconsistent with human judgment. Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions, providing novel evidence that medical image-trained feature extractors do not inherently improve FDs and can even compromise their reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/mckellwoodland/fid-med-eval.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2311.13717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Computation ; Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ; Data augmentation ; Datasets ; Feature extraction ; Image quality ; Logic ; Mathematical analysis ; Medical imaging ; Networks ; Synthetic data</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-10</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.13717$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72390-2_9$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woodland, McKell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelo, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mais Al Taie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eltaher, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shieh, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Suprateek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yung, Joshua P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ankit B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brock, Kristy K</creatorcontrib><title>Feature Extraction for Generative Medical Imaging Evaluation: New Evidence Against an Evolving Trend</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) is a widely used metric for assessing synthetic image quality. It relies on an ImageNet-based feature extractor, making its applicability to medical imaging unclear. A recent trend is to adapt FID to medical imaging through feature extractors trained on medical images. Our study challenges this practice by demonstrating that ImageNet-based extractors are more consistent and aligned with human judgment than their RadImageNet counterparts. We evaluated sixteen StyleGAN2 networks across four medical imaging modalities and four data augmentation techniques with Fréchet distances (FDs) computed using eleven ImageNet or RadImageNet-trained feature extractors. Comparison with human judgment via visual Turing tests revealed that ImageNet-based extractors produced rankings consistent with human judgment, with the FD derived from the ImageNet-trained SwAV extractor significantly correlating with expert evaluations. In contrast, RadImageNet-based rankings were volatile and inconsistent with human judgment. Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions, providing novel evidence that medical image-trained feature extractors do not inherently improve FDs and can even compromise their reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/mckellwoodland/fid-med-eval.</description><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</subject><subject>Data augmentation</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Synthetic data</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1rwkAURYdCoWL9AV11oOvYeTOTzKQ7EbWCbTfuwzN5kZE4sZOP2n_fqF1d3uXwuBzGnkBMtY1j8Yrh7PqpVABTUAbMHRtJpSCyWsoHNmmagxBCJkbGsRqxYknYdoH44twGzFtXe17Wga_IU8DW9cQ_qHA5Vnx9xL3ze77oserwQr7xT_oZbleQz4nP9uh803L0Q1dX_QXeBvLFI7svsWpo8p9jtl0utvP3aPO1Ws9nmwhjmUSlGXYm2oLRSmhrTBqnpihLZYXcpUgacg1glKaElIadRsytTiC1IFMprBqz59vbq4LsFNwRw292UZFdVQzEy404hfq7o6bNDnUX_LApkzbVkAhIE_UHzR1fnA</recordid><startdate>20241022</startdate><enddate>20241022</enddate><creator>Woodland, McKell</creator><creator>Castelo, Austin</creator><creator>Mais Al Taie</creator><creator>Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva</creator><creator>Eltaher, Mohamed</creator><creator>Mohn, Frank</creator><creator>Shieh, Alexander</creator><creator>Kundu, Suprateek</creator><creator>Yung, Joshua P</creator><creator>Patel, Ankit B</creator><creator>Brock, Kristy K</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241022</creationdate><title>Feature Extraction for Generative Medical Imaging Evaluation: New Evidence Against an Evolving Trend</title><author>Woodland, McKell ; Castelo, Austin ; Mais Al Taie ; Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva ; Eltaher, Mohamed ; Mohn, Frank ; Shieh, Alexander ; Kundu, Suprateek ; Yung, Joshua P ; Patel, Ankit B ; Brock, Kristy K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a526-f72336481743048779597dff3802b9ae41c411734e6e341b4aac8461981292083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</topic><topic>Data augmentation</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Synthetic data</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woodland, McKell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelo, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mais Al Taie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eltaher, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shieh, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Suprateek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yung, Joshua P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ankit B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brock, Kristy K</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woodland, McKell</au><au>Castelo, Austin</au><au>Mais Al Taie</au><au>Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva</au><au>Eltaher, Mohamed</au><au>Mohn, Frank</au><au>Shieh, Alexander</au><au>Kundu, Suprateek</au><au>Yung, Joshua P</au><au>Patel, Ankit B</au><au>Brock, Kristy K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feature Extraction for Generative Medical Imaging Evaluation: New Evidence Against an Evolving Trend</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-10-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) is a widely used metric for assessing synthetic image quality. It relies on an ImageNet-based feature extractor, making its applicability to medical imaging unclear. A recent trend is to adapt FID to medical imaging through feature extractors trained on medical images. Our study challenges this practice by demonstrating that ImageNet-based extractors are more consistent and aligned with human judgment than their RadImageNet counterparts. We evaluated sixteen StyleGAN2 networks across four medical imaging modalities and four data augmentation techniques with Fréchet distances (FDs) computed using eleven ImageNet or RadImageNet-trained feature extractors. Comparison with human judgment via visual Turing tests revealed that ImageNet-based extractors produced rankings consistent with human judgment, with the FD derived from the ImageNet-trained SwAV extractor significantly correlating with expert evaluations. In contrast, RadImageNet-based rankings were volatile and inconsistent with human judgment. Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions, providing novel evidence that medical image-trained feature extractors do not inherently improve FDs and can even compromise their reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/mckellwoodland/fid-med-eval.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2311.13717</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-10 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2311_13717 |
source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Computation Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Data augmentation Datasets Feature extraction Image quality Logic Mathematical analysis Medical imaging Networks Synthetic data |
title | Feature Extraction for Generative Medical Imaging Evaluation: New Evidence Against an Evolving Trend |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feature%20Extraction%20for%20Generative%20Medical%20Imaging%20Evaluation:%20New%20Evidence%20Against%20an%20Evolving%20Trend&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Woodland,%20McKell&rft.date=2024-10-22&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2311.13717&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2894160196%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2894160196&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |