Does the Mott problem extend to Geiger counters?
The Mott problem is a simpler version of the quantum measurement problem that asks: Is there a microscopic physical mechanism - based (explicitly or implicitly) only on Schroedinger's equation - that explains why a single alpha particle emitted in a spherically symmetric s-wave nuclear decay pr...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Mott problem is a simpler version of the quantum measurement problem that
asks: Is there a microscopic physical mechanism - based (explicitly or
implicitly) only on Schroedinger's equation - that explains why a single alpha
particle emitted in a spherically symmetric s-wave nuclear decay produces a
manifestly non-spherically-symmetric single track in a cloud chamber? I attempt
here to generalize earlier work that formulated such a mechanism. The key
ingredient there was identification of sites at which the cross section for
ionization by a passing charged particle is near singular at ionization
threshold. This near singularity arose from a Penning-like process involving
molecular polarization in sub-critical vapor clusters. Here, I argue that the
same Mott problem question should be asked about Geiger counters. I then define
a simple experiment to determine if ionization physics similar to the cloud
chamber case takes place in the mica window of a Geiger counter and explains
the collimation of wavefunctions that are spherically symmetric outside the
counter into linear tracks inside. The experiment measures the count rate from
a radioactive point source as a function of source-window separation. I have
performed a proof of concept of this experiment; results are reported here and
support the near-singular-ionization picture. These results are significant in
their own right, but also because they may shed light on physical mechanisms
underlying the full quantum measurement problem. I illustrate this for the
Stern-Gerlach experiment and a particular realization of superconducting
qubits. I conclude by detailing further work required to flesh out these
results more rigorously. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2310.06870 |