Can language models learn analogical reasoning? Investigating training objectives and comparisons to human performance
While analogies are a common way to evaluate word embeddings in NLP, it is also of interest to investigate whether or not analogical reasoning is a task in itself that can be learned. In this paper, we test several ways to learn basic analogical reasoning, specifically focusing on analogies that are...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Petersen, Molly R van der Plas, Lonneke |
description | While analogies are a common way to evaluate word embeddings in NLP, it is
also of interest to investigate whether or not analogical reasoning is a task
in itself that can be learned. In this paper, we test several ways to learn
basic analogical reasoning, specifically focusing on analogies that are more
typical of what is used to evaluate analogical reasoning in humans than those
in commonly used NLP benchmarks. Our experiments find that models are able to
learn analogical reasoning, even with a small amount of data. We additionally
compare our models to a dataset with a human baseline, and find that after
training, models approach human performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2310.05597 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2310_05597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2310_05597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-1df833d1f6221758c6bc1f9c3118740d5c1ae2dfa93b2b6056636d6ccbc9b8ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUMtOwzAQ9IUDKnwAJ_wDKXFcO8kJoYhHpUq99B6t7XUwcuzISSP4e9zCaWdnNTPaIeSBldtdI0T5BOnbrduKZ6IUoq1vydpBoB7CcIYB6RgN-pl6hBQoBPBxcBo8TQhzDC4Mz3QfVpwXN8CSV7okcBeeRvWFenH5lnWG6jhOkFwWzXSJ9PM85pgJk40pI4135MaCn_H-f27I6e311H0Uh-P7vns5FCDrumDGNpwbZmVVsVo0WirNbKs5Y029K43QDLAyFlquKiVLISWXRmqtdKsaBL4hj3-218f7KbkR0k9_KaC_FsB_ATTrWUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can language models learn analogical reasoning? Investigating training objectives and comparisons to human performance</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Petersen, Molly R ; van der Plas, Lonneke</creator><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Molly R ; van der Plas, Lonneke</creatorcontrib><description>While analogies are a common way to evaluate word embeddings in NLP, it is
also of interest to investigate whether or not analogical reasoning is a task
in itself that can be learned. In this paper, we test several ways to learn
basic analogical reasoning, specifically focusing on analogies that are more
typical of what is used to evaluate analogical reasoning in humans than those
in commonly used NLP benchmarks. Our experiments find that models are able to
learn analogical reasoning, even with a small amount of data. We additionally
compare our models to a dataset with a human baseline, and find that after
training, models approach human performance.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2310.05597</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><creationdate>2023-10</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05597$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.05597$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Molly R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Plas, Lonneke</creatorcontrib><title>Can language models learn analogical reasoning? Investigating training objectives and comparisons to human performance</title><description>While analogies are a common way to evaluate word embeddings in NLP, it is
also of interest to investigate whether or not analogical reasoning is a task
in itself that can be learned. In this paper, we test several ways to learn
basic analogical reasoning, specifically focusing on analogies that are more
typical of what is used to evaluate analogical reasoning in humans than those
in commonly used NLP benchmarks. Our experiments find that models are able to
learn analogical reasoning, even with a small amount of data. We additionally
compare our models to a dataset with a human baseline, and find that after
training, models approach human performance.</description><subject>Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotUMtOwzAQ9IUDKnwAJ_wDKXFcO8kJoYhHpUq99B6t7XUwcuzISSP4e9zCaWdnNTPaIeSBldtdI0T5BOnbrduKZ6IUoq1vydpBoB7CcIYB6RgN-pl6hBQoBPBxcBo8TQhzDC4Mz3QfVpwXN8CSV7okcBeeRvWFenH5lnWG6jhOkFwWzXSJ9PM85pgJk40pI4135MaCn_H-f27I6e311H0Uh-P7vns5FCDrumDGNpwbZmVVsVo0WirNbKs5Y029K43QDLAyFlquKiVLISWXRmqtdKsaBL4hj3-218f7KbkR0k9_KaC_FsB_ATTrWUs</recordid><startdate>20231009</startdate><enddate>20231009</enddate><creator>Petersen, Molly R</creator><creator>van der Plas, Lonneke</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231009</creationdate><title>Can language models learn analogical reasoning? Investigating training objectives and comparisons to human performance</title><author>Petersen, Molly R ; van der Plas, Lonneke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-1df833d1f6221758c6bc1f9c3118740d5c1ae2dfa93b2b6056636d6ccbc9b8ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Computation and Language</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Molly R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Plas, Lonneke</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, Molly R</au><au>van der Plas, Lonneke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can language models learn analogical reasoning? Investigating training objectives and comparisons to human performance</atitle><date>2023-10-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>While analogies are a common way to evaluate word embeddings in NLP, it is
also of interest to investigate whether or not analogical reasoning is a task
in itself that can be learned. In this paper, we test several ways to learn
basic analogical reasoning, specifically focusing on analogies that are more
typical of what is used to evaluate analogical reasoning in humans than those
in commonly used NLP benchmarks. Our experiments find that models are able to
learn analogical reasoning, even with a small amount of data. We additionally
compare our models to a dataset with a human baseline, and find that after
training, models approach human performance.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2310.05597</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2310.05597 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2310_05597 |
source | arXiv.org |
subjects | Computer Science - Computation and Language |
title | Can language models learn analogical reasoning? Investigating training objectives and comparisons to human performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A49%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20language%20models%20learn%20analogical%20reasoning?%20Investigating%20training%20objectives%20and%20comparisons%20to%20human%20performance&rft.au=Petersen,%20Molly%20R&rft.date=2023-10-09&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2310.05597&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2310_05597%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |