OSA-HCIM: On-The-Fly Saliency-Aware Hybrid SRAM CIM with Dynamic Precision Configuration
Computing-in-Memory (CIM) has shown great potential for enhancing efficiency and performance for deep neural networks (DNNs). However, the lack of flexibility in CIM leads to an unnecessary expenditure of computational resources on less critical operations, and a diminished Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SN...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Computing-in-Memory (CIM) has shown great potential for enhancing efficiency
and performance for deep neural networks (DNNs). However, the lack of
flexibility in CIM leads to an unnecessary expenditure of computational
resources on less critical operations, and a diminished Signal-to-Noise Ratio
(SNR) when handling more complex tasks, significantly hindering the overall
performance. Hence, we focus on the integration of CIM with Saliency-Aware
Computing -- a paradigm that dynamically tailors computing precision based on
the importance of each input. We propose On-the-fly Saliency-Aware Hybrid CIM
(OSA-HCIM) offering three primary contributions: (1) On-the-fly Saliency-Aware
(OSA) precision configuration scheme, which dynamically sets the precision of
each MAC operation based on its saliency, (2) Hybrid CIM Array (HCIMA), which
enables simultaneous operation of digital-domain CIM (DCIM) and analog-domain
CIM (ACIM) via split-port 6T SRAM, and (3) an integrated framework combining
OSA and HCIMA to fulfill diverse accuracy and power demands.
Implemented on a 65nm CMOS process, OSA-HCIM demonstrates an exceptional
balance between accuracy and resource utilization. Notably, it is the first CIM
design to incorporate a dynamic digital-to-analog boundary, providing
unprecedented flexibility for saliency-aware computing. OSA-HCIM achieves a
1.95x enhancement in energy efficiency, while maintaining minimal accuracy loss
compared to DCIM when tested on CIFAR100 dataset. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2308.15040 |