Stochastic Flight Plan Optimization

Airline operations are subject to many uncertainties, such as weather, varying demand, maintenance events, congestion, etc. Large amounts of information are currently ignored due to difficulties in processing big data sets. We explore the use of ensemble weather forecast, which presents several dist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: de Oliveira, Ítalo Romani, Altus, Steve, Tiourine, Sergey, Neto, Euclides C. Pinto, Leite, Alexandre, de Azevedo, Felipe C. F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator de Oliveira, Ítalo Romani
Altus, Steve
Tiourine, Sergey
Neto, Euclides C. Pinto
Leite, Alexandre
de Azevedo, Felipe C. F
description Airline operations are subject to many uncertainties, such as weather, varying demand, maintenance events, congestion, etc. Large amounts of information are currently ignored due to difficulties in processing big data sets. We explore the use of ensemble weather forecast, which presents several distinct weather predictions for the same time horizon. So far, ensemble forecasts have been very little exploited for flight planning purposes. Currently, airlines already carry out lots of statistical analyses on past data, and devise effective policies for how much fuel and payload an aircraft should carry and how much of time buffer should be used in the schedule. But these buffers can be further reduced by doing forward-looking stochastic optimization. The use of ensemble forecast allows to select a trajectory that optimizes the expected outcome of a flight for an array of scenarios, instead of optimizing for a single one. Besides, aircraft payload is another considerable source of uncertainty. We tested stochastic optimization, first with the objective of optimizing single flights, then with the objective of optimizing whole schedules. In one of the experiments, it was observed that, in 55.8% of the cases, stochastic optimization outperforms conventional optimization in terms of fuel consumption; in only 0.4% of the cases, conventional optimization wins; and, in the remaining 43.8% of the cases, they achieve equal results. The experiments with stochastic payload demonstrated that the use of payload uncertainty can squeeze a bit more fuel savings from the flight plan outcomes. But the use of this technology is not driven only by reducing overall fuel consumption. One optimization criterion can be the minimization of diversions or fuel emergencies, that is, choosing the candidate that minimizes the maximum fuel consumption (minimax).
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2307.14883
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2307_14883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2307_14883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a673-25d4a0f4234ea60e56c7091c791646871484ce023dab5a795d45dcf2e69c39c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzrkKwkAYBOBtLER9ACsD1ol7H6WIFwgRtA-_m41ZyCFxEfXpPatphpkPoTHBCddC4Bl0d39LKMMqIVxr1kfTQ2htCdfgbbSq_LkM0b6CJkovwdf-CcG3zRD1CqiubvTPATqulsfFJt6l6-1ivotBKhZTkXPABaeMO5DYCWkVNsQqQySXWr0PuXWYshxOApR510VuC-qkscxYwwZo8pv9KrNL52voHtlHm3217AVTYDiV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stochastic Flight Plan Optimization</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>de Oliveira, Ítalo Romani ; Altus, Steve ; Tiourine, Sergey ; Neto, Euclides C. Pinto ; Leite, Alexandre ; de Azevedo, Felipe C. F</creator><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Ítalo Romani ; Altus, Steve ; Tiourine, Sergey ; Neto, Euclides C. Pinto ; Leite, Alexandre ; de Azevedo, Felipe C. F</creatorcontrib><description>Airline operations are subject to many uncertainties, such as weather, varying demand, maintenance events, congestion, etc. Large amounts of information are currently ignored due to difficulties in processing big data sets. We explore the use of ensemble weather forecast, which presents several distinct weather predictions for the same time horizon. So far, ensemble forecasts have been very little exploited for flight planning purposes. Currently, airlines already carry out lots of statistical analyses on past data, and devise effective policies for how much fuel and payload an aircraft should carry and how much of time buffer should be used in the schedule. But these buffers can be further reduced by doing forward-looking stochastic optimization. The use of ensemble forecast allows to select a trajectory that optimizes the expected outcome of a flight for an array of scenarios, instead of optimizing for a single one. Besides, aircraft payload is another considerable source of uncertainty. We tested stochastic optimization, first with the objective of optimizing single flights, then with the objective of optimizing whole schedules. In one of the experiments, it was observed that, in 55.8% of the cases, stochastic optimization outperforms conventional optimization in terms of fuel consumption; in only 0.4% of the cases, conventional optimization wins; and, in the remaining 43.8% of the cases, they achieve equal results. The experiments with stochastic payload demonstrated that the use of payload uncertainty can squeeze a bit more fuel savings from the flight plan outcomes. But the use of this technology is not driven only by reducing overall fuel consumption. One optimization criterion can be the minimization of diversions or fuel emergencies, that is, choosing the candidate that minimizes the maximum fuel consumption (minimax).</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.14883</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Systems and Control</subject><creationdate>2023-07</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14883$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.14883$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Ítalo Romani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altus, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiourine, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Euclides C. Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Azevedo, Felipe C. F</creatorcontrib><title>Stochastic Flight Plan Optimization</title><description>Airline operations are subject to many uncertainties, such as weather, varying demand, maintenance events, congestion, etc. Large amounts of information are currently ignored due to difficulties in processing big data sets. We explore the use of ensemble weather forecast, which presents several distinct weather predictions for the same time horizon. So far, ensemble forecasts have been very little exploited for flight planning purposes. Currently, airlines already carry out lots of statistical analyses on past data, and devise effective policies for how much fuel and payload an aircraft should carry and how much of time buffer should be used in the schedule. But these buffers can be further reduced by doing forward-looking stochastic optimization. The use of ensemble forecast allows to select a trajectory that optimizes the expected outcome of a flight for an array of scenarios, instead of optimizing for a single one. Besides, aircraft payload is another considerable source of uncertainty. We tested stochastic optimization, first with the objective of optimizing single flights, then with the objective of optimizing whole schedules. In one of the experiments, it was observed that, in 55.8% of the cases, stochastic optimization outperforms conventional optimization in terms of fuel consumption; in only 0.4% of the cases, conventional optimization wins; and, in the remaining 43.8% of the cases, they achieve equal results. The experiments with stochastic payload demonstrated that the use of payload uncertainty can squeeze a bit more fuel savings from the flight plan outcomes. But the use of this technology is not driven only by reducing overall fuel consumption. One optimization criterion can be the minimization of diversions or fuel emergencies, that is, choosing the candidate that minimizes the maximum fuel consumption (minimax).</description><subject>Computer Science - Systems and Control</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzrkKwkAYBOBtLER9ACsD1ol7H6WIFwgRtA-_m41ZyCFxEfXpPatphpkPoTHBCddC4Bl0d39LKMMqIVxr1kfTQ2htCdfgbbSq_LkM0b6CJkovwdf-CcG3zRD1CqiubvTPATqulsfFJt6l6-1ivotBKhZTkXPABaeMO5DYCWkVNsQqQySXWr0PuXWYshxOApR510VuC-qkscxYwwZo8pv9KrNL52voHtlHm3217AVTYDiV</recordid><startdate>20230727</startdate><enddate>20230727</enddate><creator>de Oliveira, Ítalo Romani</creator><creator>Altus, Steve</creator><creator>Tiourine, Sergey</creator><creator>Neto, Euclides C. Pinto</creator><creator>Leite, Alexandre</creator><creator>de Azevedo, Felipe C. F</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230727</creationdate><title>Stochastic Flight Plan Optimization</title><author>de Oliveira, Ítalo Romani ; Altus, Steve ; Tiourine, Sergey ; Neto, Euclides C. Pinto ; Leite, Alexandre ; de Azevedo, Felipe C. F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a673-25d4a0f4234ea60e56c7091c791646871484ce023dab5a795d45dcf2e69c39c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Systems and Control</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Ítalo Romani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altus, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiourine, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Euclides C. Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Azevedo, Felipe C. F</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Oliveira, Ítalo Romani</au><au>Altus, Steve</au><au>Tiourine, Sergey</au><au>Neto, Euclides C. Pinto</au><au>Leite, Alexandre</au><au>de Azevedo, Felipe C. F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stochastic Flight Plan Optimization</atitle><date>2023-07-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>Airline operations are subject to many uncertainties, such as weather, varying demand, maintenance events, congestion, etc. Large amounts of information are currently ignored due to difficulties in processing big data sets. We explore the use of ensemble weather forecast, which presents several distinct weather predictions for the same time horizon. So far, ensemble forecasts have been very little exploited for flight planning purposes. Currently, airlines already carry out lots of statistical analyses on past data, and devise effective policies for how much fuel and payload an aircraft should carry and how much of time buffer should be used in the schedule. But these buffers can be further reduced by doing forward-looking stochastic optimization. The use of ensemble forecast allows to select a trajectory that optimizes the expected outcome of a flight for an array of scenarios, instead of optimizing for a single one. Besides, aircraft payload is another considerable source of uncertainty. We tested stochastic optimization, first with the objective of optimizing single flights, then with the objective of optimizing whole schedules. In one of the experiments, it was observed that, in 55.8% of the cases, stochastic optimization outperforms conventional optimization in terms of fuel consumption; in only 0.4% of the cases, conventional optimization wins; and, in the remaining 43.8% of the cases, they achieve equal results. The experiments with stochastic payload demonstrated that the use of payload uncertainty can squeeze a bit more fuel savings from the flight plan outcomes. But the use of this technology is not driven only by reducing overall fuel consumption. One optimization criterion can be the minimization of diversions or fuel emergencies, that is, choosing the candidate that minimizes the maximum fuel consumption (minimax).</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2307.14883</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.14883
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2307_14883
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Systems and Control
title Stochastic Flight Plan Optimization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A29%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stochastic%20Flight%20Plan%20Optimization&rft.au=de%20Oliveira,%20%C3%8Dtalo%20Romani&rft.date=2023-07-27&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2307.14883&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2307_14883%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true