YOLOBench: Benchmarking Efficient Object Detectors on Embedded Systems
We present YOLOBench, a benchmark comprised of 550+ YOLO-based object detection models on 4 different datasets and 4 different embedded hardware platforms (x86 CPU, ARM CPU, Nvidia GPU, NPU). We collect accuracy and latency numbers for a variety of YOLO-based one-stage detectors at different model s...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Lazarevich, Ivan Grimaldi, Matteo Kumar, Ravish Mitra, Saptarshi Khan, Shahrukh Sah, Sudhakar |
description | We present YOLOBench, a benchmark comprised of 550+ YOLO-based object
detection models on 4 different datasets and 4 different embedded hardware
platforms (x86 CPU, ARM CPU, Nvidia GPU, NPU). We collect accuracy and latency
numbers for a variety of YOLO-based one-stage detectors at different model
scales by performing a fair, controlled comparison of these detectors with a
fixed training environment (code and training hyperparameters).
Pareto-optimality analysis of the collected data reveals that, if modern
detection heads and training techniques are incorporated into the learning
process, multiple architectures of the YOLO series achieve a good
accuracy-latency trade-off, including older models like YOLOv3 and YOLOv4. We
also evaluate training-free accuracy estimators used in neural architecture
search on YOLOBench and demonstrate that, while most state-of-the-art zero-cost
accuracy estimators are outperformed by a simple baseline like MAC count, some
of them can be effectively used to predict Pareto-optimal detection models. We
showcase that by using a zero-cost proxy to identify a YOLO architecture
competitive against a state-of-the-art YOLOv8 model on a Raspberry Pi 4 CPU.
The code and data are available at
https://github.com/Deeplite/deeplite-torch-zoo |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2307.13901 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2307_13901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2307_13901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a671-408fe84a4f0c4ac013e3b139cf1827fce4a49eef80e5db4bc24d379f33c8e433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj7FOwzAURb0woMIHMOEfSLDznMZhg5JCpUgZysIU2c_vFQNJURIh-veEwHSGK12dI8SVVqmxea5u3PAdv9IMVJFqKJU-F9uXpm7uqcfXW7mgc8N77A-yYo4YqZ9k498IJ_lA04zjMMpjL6vOUwgU5P40TtSNF-KM3cdIl_9cif22et48JXXzuNvc1YlbFzoxyjJZ4wwrNA6VBgI_iyBrmxWMNE8lEVtFefDGY2YCFCUDoCUDsBLXf69LR_s5xNn21P72tEsP_ABXC0WR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>YOLOBench: Benchmarking Efficient Object Detectors on Embedded Systems</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Lazarevich, Ivan ; Grimaldi, Matteo ; Kumar, Ravish ; Mitra, Saptarshi ; Khan, Shahrukh ; Sah, Sudhakar</creator><creatorcontrib>Lazarevich, Ivan ; Grimaldi, Matteo ; Kumar, Ravish ; Mitra, Saptarshi ; Khan, Shahrukh ; Sah, Sudhakar</creatorcontrib><description>We present YOLOBench, a benchmark comprised of 550+ YOLO-based object
detection models on 4 different datasets and 4 different embedded hardware
platforms (x86 CPU, ARM CPU, Nvidia GPU, NPU). We collect accuracy and latency
numbers for a variety of YOLO-based one-stage detectors at different model
scales by performing a fair, controlled comparison of these detectors with a
fixed training environment (code and training hyperparameters).
Pareto-optimality analysis of the collected data reveals that, if modern
detection heads and training techniques are incorporated into the learning
process, multiple architectures of the YOLO series achieve a good
accuracy-latency trade-off, including older models like YOLOv3 and YOLOv4. We
also evaluate training-free accuracy estimators used in neural architecture
search on YOLOBench and demonstrate that, while most state-of-the-art zero-cost
accuracy estimators are outperformed by a simple baseline like MAC count, some
of them can be effectively used to predict Pareto-optimal detection models. We
showcase that by using a zero-cost proxy to identify a YOLO architecture
competitive against a state-of-the-art YOLOv8 model on a Raspberry Pi 4 CPU.
The code and data are available at
https://github.com/Deeplite/deeplite-torch-zoo</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.13901</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</subject><creationdate>2023-07</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13901$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.13901$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lazarevich, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimaldi, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Ravish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitra, Saptarshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Shahrukh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sah, Sudhakar</creatorcontrib><title>YOLOBench: Benchmarking Efficient Object Detectors on Embedded Systems</title><description>We present YOLOBench, a benchmark comprised of 550+ YOLO-based object
detection models on 4 different datasets and 4 different embedded hardware
platforms (x86 CPU, ARM CPU, Nvidia GPU, NPU). We collect accuracy and latency
numbers for a variety of YOLO-based one-stage detectors at different model
scales by performing a fair, controlled comparison of these detectors with a
fixed training environment (code and training hyperparameters).
Pareto-optimality analysis of the collected data reveals that, if modern
detection heads and training techniques are incorporated into the learning
process, multiple architectures of the YOLO series achieve a good
accuracy-latency trade-off, including older models like YOLOv3 and YOLOv4. We
also evaluate training-free accuracy estimators used in neural architecture
search on YOLOBench and demonstrate that, while most state-of-the-art zero-cost
accuracy estimators are outperformed by a simple baseline like MAC count, some
of them can be effectively used to predict Pareto-optimal detection models. We
showcase that by using a zero-cost proxy to identify a YOLO architecture
competitive against a state-of-the-art YOLOv8 model on a Raspberry Pi 4 CPU.
The code and data are available at
https://github.com/Deeplite/deeplite-torch-zoo</description><subject>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj7FOwzAURb0woMIHMOEfSLDznMZhg5JCpUgZysIU2c_vFQNJURIh-veEwHSGK12dI8SVVqmxea5u3PAdv9IMVJFqKJU-F9uXpm7uqcfXW7mgc8N77A-yYo4YqZ9k498IJ_lA04zjMMpjL6vOUwgU5P40TtSNF-KM3cdIl_9cif22et48JXXzuNvc1YlbFzoxyjJZ4wwrNA6VBgI_iyBrmxWMNE8lEVtFefDGY2YCFCUDoCUDsBLXf69LR_s5xNn21P72tEsP_ABXC0WR</recordid><startdate>20230725</startdate><enddate>20230725</enddate><creator>Lazarevich, Ivan</creator><creator>Grimaldi, Matteo</creator><creator>Kumar, Ravish</creator><creator>Mitra, Saptarshi</creator><creator>Khan, Shahrukh</creator><creator>Sah, Sudhakar</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230725</creationdate><title>YOLOBench: Benchmarking Efficient Object Detectors on Embedded Systems</title><author>Lazarevich, Ivan ; Grimaldi, Matteo ; Kumar, Ravish ; Mitra, Saptarshi ; Khan, Shahrukh ; Sah, Sudhakar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a671-408fe84a4f0c4ac013e3b139cf1827fce4a49eef80e5db4bc24d379f33c8e433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lazarevich, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimaldi, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Ravish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitra, Saptarshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Shahrukh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sah, Sudhakar</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lazarevich, Ivan</au><au>Grimaldi, Matteo</au><au>Kumar, Ravish</au><au>Mitra, Saptarshi</au><au>Khan, Shahrukh</au><au>Sah, Sudhakar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>YOLOBench: Benchmarking Efficient Object Detectors on Embedded Systems</atitle><date>2023-07-25</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>We present YOLOBench, a benchmark comprised of 550+ YOLO-based object
detection models on 4 different datasets and 4 different embedded hardware
platforms (x86 CPU, ARM CPU, Nvidia GPU, NPU). We collect accuracy and latency
numbers for a variety of YOLO-based one-stage detectors at different model
scales by performing a fair, controlled comparison of these detectors with a
fixed training environment (code and training hyperparameters).
Pareto-optimality analysis of the collected data reveals that, if modern
detection heads and training techniques are incorporated into the learning
process, multiple architectures of the YOLO series achieve a good
accuracy-latency trade-off, including older models like YOLOv3 and YOLOv4. We
also evaluate training-free accuracy estimators used in neural architecture
search on YOLOBench and demonstrate that, while most state-of-the-art zero-cost
accuracy estimators are outperformed by a simple baseline like MAC count, some
of them can be effectively used to predict Pareto-optimal detection models. We
showcase that by using a zero-cost proxy to identify a YOLO architecture
competitive against a state-of-the-art YOLOv8 model on a Raspberry Pi 4 CPU.
The code and data are available at
https://github.com/Deeplite/deeplite-torch-zoo</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2307.13901</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.13901 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2307_13901 |
source | arXiv.org |
subjects | Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
title | YOLOBench: Benchmarking Efficient Object Detectors on Embedded Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T07%3A11%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=YOLOBench:%20Benchmarking%20Efficient%20Object%20Detectors%20on%20Embedded%20Systems&rft.au=Lazarevich,%20Ivan&rft.date=2023-07-25&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2307.13901&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2307_13901%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |