Discreteness of asymptotic tensor ranks

Tensor parameters that are amortized or regularized over large tensor powers, often called "asymptotic" tensor parameters, play a central role in several areas including algebraic complexity theory (constructing fast matrix multiplication algorithms), quantum information (entanglement cost...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Briët, Jop, Christandl, Matthias, Leigh, Itai, Shpilka, Amir, Zuiddam, Jeroen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Briët, Jop
Christandl, Matthias
Leigh, Itai
Shpilka, Amir
Zuiddam, Jeroen
description Tensor parameters that are amortized or regularized over large tensor powers, often called "asymptotic" tensor parameters, play a central role in several areas including algebraic complexity theory (constructing fast matrix multiplication algorithms), quantum information (entanglement cost and distillable entanglement), and additive combinatorics (bounds on cap sets, sunflower-free sets, etc.). Examples are the asymptotic tensor rank, asymptotic slice rank and asymptotic subrank. Recent works (Costa-Dalai, Blatter-Draisma-Rupniewski, Christandl-Gesmundo-Zuiddam) have investigated notions of discreteness (no accumulation points) or "gaps" in the values of such tensor parameters. We prove a general discreteness theorem for asymptotic tensor parameters of order-three tensors and use this to prove that (1) over any finite field (and in fact any finite set of coefficients in any field), the asymptotic subrank and the asymptotic slice rank have no accumulation points, and (2) over the complex numbers, the asymptotic slice rank has no accumulation points. Central to our approach are two new general lower bounds on the asymptotic subrank of tensors, which measures how much a tensor can be diagonalized. The first lower bound says that the asymptotic subrank of any concise three-tensor is at least the cube-root of the smallest dimension. The second lower bound says that any concise three-tensor that is "narrow enough" (has one dimension much smaller than the other two) has maximal asymptotic subrank. Our proofs rely on new lower bounds on the maximum rank in matrix subspaces that are obtained by slicing a three-tensor in the three different directions. We prove that for any concise tensor, the product of any two such maximum ranks must be large, and as a consequence there are always two distinct directions with large max-rank.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2306.01718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2306_01718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2306_01718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a678-9b69962444d4475664a42204808c70a15b5ad1fa44ba3a72ddeb965019cd18ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzjsLwjAYheEsDqL-ACe7ObUm6ZfbKN5BcHEvX5oUitqWpIj-e6_TgXc4PIRMGc1AC0EXGB71PeM5lRlliukhma_rWAbf-8bHmLRVgvF56_q2r8vkHWMbkoDNJY7JoMJr9JP_jsh5uzmv9unxtDuslscUpdKpsdIYyQHAASghJSBwTkFTXSqKTFiBjlUIYDFHxZ3z1khBmSkd02jzEZn9br_Sogv1DcOz-IiLrzh_AZn3Olk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discreteness of asymptotic tensor ranks</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Briët, Jop ; Christandl, Matthias ; Leigh, Itai ; Shpilka, Amir ; Zuiddam, Jeroen</creator><creatorcontrib>Briët, Jop ; Christandl, Matthias ; Leigh, Itai ; Shpilka, Amir ; Zuiddam, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><description>Tensor parameters that are amortized or regularized over large tensor powers, often called "asymptotic" tensor parameters, play a central role in several areas including algebraic complexity theory (constructing fast matrix multiplication algorithms), quantum information (entanglement cost and distillable entanglement), and additive combinatorics (bounds on cap sets, sunflower-free sets, etc.). Examples are the asymptotic tensor rank, asymptotic slice rank and asymptotic subrank. Recent works (Costa-Dalai, Blatter-Draisma-Rupniewski, Christandl-Gesmundo-Zuiddam) have investigated notions of discreteness (no accumulation points) or "gaps" in the values of such tensor parameters. We prove a general discreteness theorem for asymptotic tensor parameters of order-three tensors and use this to prove that (1) over any finite field (and in fact any finite set of coefficients in any field), the asymptotic subrank and the asymptotic slice rank have no accumulation points, and (2) over the complex numbers, the asymptotic slice rank has no accumulation points. Central to our approach are two new general lower bounds on the asymptotic subrank of tensors, which measures how much a tensor can be diagonalized. The first lower bound says that the asymptotic subrank of any concise three-tensor is at least the cube-root of the smallest dimension. The second lower bound says that any concise three-tensor that is "narrow enough" (has one dimension much smaller than the other two) has maximal asymptotic subrank. Our proofs rely on new lower bounds on the maximum rank in matrix subspaces that are obtained by slicing a three-tensor in the three different directions. We prove that for any concise tensor, the product of any two such maximum ranks must be large, and as a consequence there are always two distinct directions with large max-rank.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2306.01718</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Computational Complexity ; Mathematics - Combinatorics ; Physics - Quantum Physics</subject><creationdate>2023-06</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01718$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.01718$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Briët, Jop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christandl, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leigh, Itai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpilka, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuiddam, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><title>Discreteness of asymptotic tensor ranks</title><description>Tensor parameters that are amortized or regularized over large tensor powers, often called "asymptotic" tensor parameters, play a central role in several areas including algebraic complexity theory (constructing fast matrix multiplication algorithms), quantum information (entanglement cost and distillable entanglement), and additive combinatorics (bounds on cap sets, sunflower-free sets, etc.). Examples are the asymptotic tensor rank, asymptotic slice rank and asymptotic subrank. Recent works (Costa-Dalai, Blatter-Draisma-Rupniewski, Christandl-Gesmundo-Zuiddam) have investigated notions of discreteness (no accumulation points) or "gaps" in the values of such tensor parameters. We prove a general discreteness theorem for asymptotic tensor parameters of order-three tensors and use this to prove that (1) over any finite field (and in fact any finite set of coefficients in any field), the asymptotic subrank and the asymptotic slice rank have no accumulation points, and (2) over the complex numbers, the asymptotic slice rank has no accumulation points. Central to our approach are two new general lower bounds on the asymptotic subrank of tensors, which measures how much a tensor can be diagonalized. The first lower bound says that the asymptotic subrank of any concise three-tensor is at least the cube-root of the smallest dimension. The second lower bound says that any concise three-tensor that is "narrow enough" (has one dimension much smaller than the other two) has maximal asymptotic subrank. Our proofs rely on new lower bounds on the maximum rank in matrix subspaces that are obtained by slicing a three-tensor in the three different directions. We prove that for any concise tensor, the product of any two such maximum ranks must be large, and as a consequence there are always two distinct directions with large max-rank.</description><subject>Computer Science - Computational Complexity</subject><subject>Mathematics - Combinatorics</subject><subject>Physics - Quantum Physics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzjsLwjAYheEsDqL-ACe7ObUm6ZfbKN5BcHEvX5oUitqWpIj-e6_TgXc4PIRMGc1AC0EXGB71PeM5lRlliukhma_rWAbf-8bHmLRVgvF56_q2r8vkHWMbkoDNJY7JoMJr9JP_jsh5uzmv9unxtDuslscUpdKpsdIYyQHAASghJSBwTkFTXSqKTFiBjlUIYDFHxZ3z1khBmSkd02jzEZn9br_Sogv1DcOz-IiLrzh_AZn3Olk</recordid><startdate>20230602</startdate><enddate>20230602</enddate><creator>Briët, Jop</creator><creator>Christandl, Matthias</creator><creator>Leigh, Itai</creator><creator>Shpilka, Amir</creator><creator>Zuiddam, Jeroen</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>AKZ</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230602</creationdate><title>Discreteness of asymptotic tensor ranks</title><author>Briët, Jop ; Christandl, Matthias ; Leigh, Itai ; Shpilka, Amir ; Zuiddam, Jeroen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a678-9b69962444d4475664a42204808c70a15b5ad1fa44ba3a72ddeb965019cd18ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Computational Complexity</topic><topic>Mathematics - Combinatorics</topic><topic>Physics - Quantum Physics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Briët, Jop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christandl, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leigh, Itai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpilka, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuiddam, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv Mathematics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Briët, Jop</au><au>Christandl, Matthias</au><au>Leigh, Itai</au><au>Shpilka, Amir</au><au>Zuiddam, Jeroen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discreteness of asymptotic tensor ranks</atitle><date>2023-06-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>Tensor parameters that are amortized or regularized over large tensor powers, often called "asymptotic" tensor parameters, play a central role in several areas including algebraic complexity theory (constructing fast matrix multiplication algorithms), quantum information (entanglement cost and distillable entanglement), and additive combinatorics (bounds on cap sets, sunflower-free sets, etc.). Examples are the asymptotic tensor rank, asymptotic slice rank and asymptotic subrank. Recent works (Costa-Dalai, Blatter-Draisma-Rupniewski, Christandl-Gesmundo-Zuiddam) have investigated notions of discreteness (no accumulation points) or "gaps" in the values of such tensor parameters. We prove a general discreteness theorem for asymptotic tensor parameters of order-three tensors and use this to prove that (1) over any finite field (and in fact any finite set of coefficients in any field), the asymptotic subrank and the asymptotic slice rank have no accumulation points, and (2) over the complex numbers, the asymptotic slice rank has no accumulation points. Central to our approach are two new general lower bounds on the asymptotic subrank of tensors, which measures how much a tensor can be diagonalized. The first lower bound says that the asymptotic subrank of any concise three-tensor is at least the cube-root of the smallest dimension. The second lower bound says that any concise three-tensor that is "narrow enough" (has one dimension much smaller than the other two) has maximal asymptotic subrank. Our proofs rely on new lower bounds on the maximum rank in matrix subspaces that are obtained by slicing a three-tensor in the three different directions. We prove that for any concise tensor, the product of any two such maximum ranks must be large, and as a consequence there are always two distinct directions with large max-rank.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2306.01718</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2306.01718
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2306_01718
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Computational Complexity
Mathematics - Combinatorics
Physics - Quantum Physics
title Discreteness of asymptotic tensor ranks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A20%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discreteness%20of%20asymptotic%20tensor%20ranks&rft.au=Bri%C3%ABt,%20Jop&rft.date=2023-06-02&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2306.01718&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2306_01718%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true