Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluation

In the current landscape of ever-increasing levels of digitalization, we are facing major challenges pertaining to scalability. Recommender systems have become irreplaceable both for helping users navigate the increasing amounts of data and, conversely, aiding providers in marketing products to inte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-05
Hauptverfasser: Vassøy, Bjørnar, Langseth, Helge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Vassøy, Bjørnar
Langseth, Helge
description In the current landscape of ever-increasing levels of digitalization, we are facing major challenges pertaining to scalability. Recommender systems have become irreplaceable both for helping users navigate the increasing amounts of data and, conversely, aiding providers in marketing products to interested users. The growing awareness of discrimination in machine learning methods has recently motivated both academia and industry to research how fairness can be ensured in recommender systems. For recommender systems, such issues are well exemplified by occupation recommendation, where biases in historical data may lead to recommender systems relating one gender to lower wages or to the propagation of stereotypes. In particular, consumer-side fairness, which focuses on mitigating discrimination experienced by users of recommender systems, has seen a vast number of diverse approaches for addressing different types of discrimination. The nature of said discrimination depends on the setting and the applied fairness interpretation, of which there are many variations. This survey serves as a systematic overview and discussion of the current research on consumer-side fairness in recommender systems. To that end, a novel taxonomy based on high-level fairness interpretation is proposed and used to categorize the research and their proposed fairness evaluation metrics. Finally, we highlight some suggestions for the future direction of the field.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2305.09330
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2305_09330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2814621475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a950-45b0e452aa7a3cbe8947f90ed09d6426b5ec0d24720b99eb5a52e87f6b8745083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUF9LwzAcDILgmPsAPhnwufPX_GkS38bYVJgIbo9CSZtfsWNNZtIO9-2dm093cMdxd4Tc5TAVWkp4tPGnPUwZBzkFwzlckRHjPM-0YOyGTFLaAgArFJOSj8jnPPg0dBiz1DqkS9tGjynR1tMPrEPXoXcY6fqYeuzSE539U9u3NV0P8YBHGhr6hv1XcIla7-jiYHfDSQ_-llw3dpdw8o9jslkuNvOXbPX-_DqfrTJrJGRCVoBCMmuV5XWF2gjVGEAHxhWCFZXEGhwTikFlDFbSSoZaNUWllZCg-ZjcX2LP08t9bDsbj-XfBeX5gpPj4eLYx_A9YOrLbRiiP3Uqmc5FwXKhJP8FVAZesA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2814621475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluation</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Vassøy, Bjørnar ; Langseth, Helge</creator><creatorcontrib>Vassøy, Bjørnar ; Langseth, Helge</creatorcontrib><description>In the current landscape of ever-increasing levels of digitalization, we are facing major challenges pertaining to scalability. Recommender systems have become irreplaceable both for helping users navigate the increasing amounts of data and, conversely, aiding providers in marketing products to interested users. The growing awareness of discrimination in machine learning methods has recently motivated both academia and industry to research how fairness can be ensured in recommender systems. For recommender systems, such issues are well exemplified by occupation recommendation, where biases in historical data may lead to recommender systems relating one gender to lower wages or to the propagation of stereotypes. In particular, consumer-side fairness, which focuses on mitigating discrimination experienced by users of recommender systems, has seen a vast number of diverse approaches for addressing different types of discrimination. The nature of said discrimination depends on the setting and the applied fairness interpretation, of which there are many variations. This survey serves as a systematic overview and discussion of the current research on consumer-side fairness in recommender systems. To that end, a novel taxonomy based on high-level fairness interpretation is proposed and used to categorize the research and their proposed fairness evaluation metrics. Finally, we highlight some suggestions for the future direction of the field.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2305.09330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science - Computers and Society ; Computer Science - Information Retrieval ; Computer Science - Learning ; Digitization ; Machine learning ; Recommender systems ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-05</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,777,781,882,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10663-5$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.09330$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vassøy, Bjørnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langseth, Helge</creatorcontrib><title>Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluation</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>In the current landscape of ever-increasing levels of digitalization, we are facing major challenges pertaining to scalability. Recommender systems have become irreplaceable both for helping users navigate the increasing amounts of data and, conversely, aiding providers in marketing products to interested users. The growing awareness of discrimination in machine learning methods has recently motivated both academia and industry to research how fairness can be ensured in recommender systems. For recommender systems, such issues are well exemplified by occupation recommendation, where biases in historical data may lead to recommender systems relating one gender to lower wages or to the propagation of stereotypes. In particular, consumer-side fairness, which focuses on mitigating discrimination experienced by users of recommender systems, has seen a vast number of diverse approaches for addressing different types of discrimination. The nature of said discrimination depends on the setting and the applied fairness interpretation, of which there are many variations. This survey serves as a systematic overview and discussion of the current research on consumer-side fairness in recommender systems. To that end, a novel taxonomy based on high-level fairness interpretation is proposed and used to categorize the research and their proposed fairness evaluation metrics. Finally, we highlight some suggestions for the future direction of the field.</description><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science - Computers and Society</subject><subject>Computer Science - Information Retrieval</subject><subject>Computer Science - Learning</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Recommender systems</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotUF9LwzAcDILgmPsAPhnwufPX_GkS38bYVJgIbo9CSZtfsWNNZtIO9-2dm093cMdxd4Tc5TAVWkp4tPGnPUwZBzkFwzlckRHjPM-0YOyGTFLaAgArFJOSj8jnPPg0dBiz1DqkS9tGjynR1tMPrEPXoXcY6fqYeuzSE539U9u3NV0P8YBHGhr6hv1XcIla7-jiYHfDSQ_-llw3dpdw8o9jslkuNvOXbPX-_DqfrTJrJGRCVoBCMmuV5XWF2gjVGEAHxhWCFZXEGhwTikFlDFbSSoZaNUWllZCg-ZjcX2LP08t9bDsbj-XfBeX5gpPj4eLYx_A9YOrLbRiiP3Uqmc5FwXKhJP8FVAZesA</recordid><startdate>20230516</startdate><enddate>20230516</enddate><creator>Vassøy, Bjørnar</creator><creator>Langseth, Helge</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230516</creationdate><title>Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluation</title><author>Vassøy, Bjørnar ; Langseth, Helge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a950-45b0e452aa7a3cbe8947f90ed09d6426b5ec0d24720b99eb5a52e87f6b8745083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science - Computers and Society</topic><topic>Computer Science - Information Retrieval</topic><topic>Computer Science - Learning</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Recommender systems</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vassøy, Bjørnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langseth, Helge</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vassøy, Bjørnar</au><au>Langseth, Helge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-05-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>In the current landscape of ever-increasing levels of digitalization, we are facing major challenges pertaining to scalability. Recommender systems have become irreplaceable both for helping users navigate the increasing amounts of data and, conversely, aiding providers in marketing products to interested users. The growing awareness of discrimination in machine learning methods has recently motivated both academia and industry to research how fairness can be ensured in recommender systems. For recommender systems, such issues are well exemplified by occupation recommendation, where biases in historical data may lead to recommender systems relating one gender to lower wages or to the propagation of stereotypes. In particular, consumer-side fairness, which focuses on mitigating discrimination experienced by users of recommender systems, has seen a vast number of diverse approaches for addressing different types of discrimination. The nature of said discrimination depends on the setting and the applied fairness interpretation, of which there are many variations. This survey serves as a systematic overview and discussion of the current research on consumer-side fairness in recommender systems. To that end, a novel taxonomy based on high-level fairness interpretation is proposed and used to categorize the research and their proposed fairness evaluation metrics. Finally, we highlight some suggestions for the future direction of the field.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2305.09330</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2023-05
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2305_09330
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science - Computers and Society
Computer Science - Information Retrieval
Computer Science - Learning
Digitization
Machine learning
Recommender systems
Taxonomy
title Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T06%3A04%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumer-side%20Fairness%20in%20Recommender%20Systems:%20A%20Systematic%20Survey%20of%20Methods%20and%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Vass%C3%B8y,%20Bj%C3%B8rnar&rft.date=2023-05-16&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2305.09330&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2814621475%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2814621475&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true