Bridging History with AI A Comparative Evaluation of GPT 3.5, GPT4, and GoogleBARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact Checking

The rapid proliferation of information in the digital era underscores the importance of accurate historical representation and interpretation. While artificial intelligence has shown promise in various fields, its potential for historical fact-checking and gap-filling remains largely untapped. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Tasar, Davut Emre, Tasar, Ceren Ocal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Tasar, Davut Emre
Tasar, Ceren Ocal
description The rapid proliferation of information in the digital era underscores the importance of accurate historical representation and interpretation. While artificial intelligence has shown promise in various fields, its potential for historical fact-checking and gap-filling remains largely untapped. This study evaluates the performance of three large language models LLMs GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and GoogleBARD in the context of predicting and verifying historical events based on given data. A novel metric, Distance to Reality (DTR), is introduced to assess the models' outputs against established historical facts. The results reveal a substantial potential for AI in historical studies, with GPT 4 demonstrating superior performance. This paper underscores the need for further research into AI's role in enriching our understanding of the past and bridging historical knowledge gaps.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2305.07868
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2305_07868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2305_07868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a678-bab0d430c83132654c4855892c54a363352774824636ef3418e350a54c6be0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUMtOg0AUZePCVD_AlfcDCg7cmWFcUuwraWKj3ZPLMNCJFJoprRJ_vgVdnbM4j5zjeU8hC7gSgr2Q-7GXIEImAhYrqe6935mzRWWbClb21LWuh2_b7SFZQwJpeziSo85eDMwvVJ9vtG2gLWG53QEGYjoQPgVqCli2bVWbWfLxBraBrTOF1aMz0frsSPejakG6g3Rv9Net8sG7K6k-mcd_nHifi_kuXfmb9-U6TTY-yVj5OeWs4Mi0whAjKbgetqjXSAtOKBFFFMdcRVyiNCXyUBkUjG46mRtW4MR7_ksdx2dHZw_k-mw4IRtPwCvAPVQe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bridging History with AI A Comparative Evaluation of GPT 3.5, GPT4, and GoogleBARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact Checking</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Tasar, Davut Emre ; Tasar, Ceren Ocal</creator><creatorcontrib>Tasar, Davut Emre ; Tasar, Ceren Ocal</creatorcontrib><description>The rapid proliferation of information in the digital era underscores the importance of accurate historical representation and interpretation. While artificial intelligence has shown promise in various fields, its potential for historical fact-checking and gap-filling remains largely untapped. This study evaluates the performance of three large language models LLMs GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and GoogleBARD in the context of predicting and verifying historical events based on given data. A novel metric, Distance to Reality (DTR), is introduced to assess the models' outputs against established historical facts. The results reveal a substantial potential for AI in historical studies, with GPT 4 demonstrating superior performance. This paper underscores the need for further research into AI's role in enriching our understanding of the past and bridging historical knowledge gaps.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2305.07868</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><creationdate>2023-05</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07868$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.07868$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tasar, Davut Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasar, Ceren Ocal</creatorcontrib><title>Bridging History with AI A Comparative Evaluation of GPT 3.5, GPT4, and GoogleBARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact Checking</title><description>The rapid proliferation of information in the digital era underscores the importance of accurate historical representation and interpretation. While artificial intelligence has shown promise in various fields, its potential for historical fact-checking and gap-filling remains largely untapped. This study evaluates the performance of three large language models LLMs GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and GoogleBARD in the context of predicting and verifying historical events based on given data. A novel metric, Distance to Reality (DTR), is introduced to assess the models' outputs against established historical facts. The results reveal a substantial potential for AI in historical studies, with GPT 4 demonstrating superior performance. This paper underscores the need for further research into AI's role in enriching our understanding of the past and bridging historical knowledge gaps.</description><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science - Computation and Language</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotUMtOg0AUZePCVD_AlfcDCg7cmWFcUuwraWKj3ZPLMNCJFJoprRJ_vgVdnbM4j5zjeU8hC7gSgr2Q-7GXIEImAhYrqe6935mzRWWbClb21LWuh2_b7SFZQwJpeziSo85eDMwvVJ9vtG2gLWG53QEGYjoQPgVqCli2bVWbWfLxBraBrTOF1aMz0frsSPejakG6g3Rv9Net8sG7K6k-mcd_nHifi_kuXfmb9-U6TTY-yVj5OeWs4Mi0whAjKbgetqjXSAtOKBFFFMdcRVyiNCXyUBkUjG46mRtW4MR7_ksdx2dHZw_k-mw4IRtPwCvAPVQe</recordid><startdate>20230513</startdate><enddate>20230513</enddate><creator>Tasar, Davut Emre</creator><creator>Tasar, Ceren Ocal</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230513</creationdate><title>Bridging History with AI A Comparative Evaluation of GPT 3.5, GPT4, and GoogleBARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact Checking</title><author>Tasar, Davut Emre ; Tasar, Ceren Ocal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a678-bab0d430c83132654c4855892c54a363352774824636ef3418e350a54c6be0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science - Computation and Language</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tasar, Davut Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasar, Ceren Ocal</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tasar, Davut Emre</au><au>Tasar, Ceren Ocal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bridging History with AI A Comparative Evaluation of GPT 3.5, GPT4, and GoogleBARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact Checking</atitle><date>2023-05-13</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>The rapid proliferation of information in the digital era underscores the importance of accurate historical representation and interpretation. While artificial intelligence has shown promise in various fields, its potential for historical fact-checking and gap-filling remains largely untapped. This study evaluates the performance of three large language models LLMs GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and GoogleBARD in the context of predicting and verifying historical events based on given data. A novel metric, Distance to Reality (DTR), is introduced to assess the models' outputs against established historical facts. The results reveal a substantial potential for AI in historical studies, with GPT 4 demonstrating superior performance. This paper underscores the need for further research into AI's role in enriching our understanding of the past and bridging historical knowledge gaps.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2305.07868</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2305.07868
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2305_07868
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science - Computation and Language
title Bridging History with AI A Comparative Evaluation of GPT 3.5, GPT4, and GoogleBARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact Checking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A03%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bridging%20History%20with%20AI%20A%20Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20GPT%203.5,%20GPT4,%20and%20GoogleBARD%20in%20Predictive%20Accuracy%20and%20Fact%20Checking&rft.au=Tasar,%20Davut%20Emre&rft.date=2023-05-13&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2305.07868&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2305_07868%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true