Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements

We compare the predictions of the GUMICS\(-\)4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth's magnetosphere with Cluster~SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-05
Hauptverfasser: Facsko, Gabor, Sibeck, David, Honkonen, Ilja, Bor, Jozsef, German Farinas Perez, Timar, Aniko, Shprits, Yuri, Peitso, Pyry, Degener, Laura, Tanskanen, Eija, Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu, Szalai, Sandor, Kis, Arpad, Wesztergom, Viktor, Madar, Akos, Biro, Nikolett, Koban, Gergely, Illyes, Andras, Kovacs, Peter, Dalya, Zsuzsanna, Lkhagvadorj, Munkhjargal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Facsko, Gabor
Sibeck, David
Honkonen, Ilja
Bor, Jozsef
German Farinas Perez
Timar, Aniko
Shprits, Yuri
Peitso, Pyry
Degener, Laura
Tanskanen, Eija
Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu
Szalai, Sandor
Kis, Arpad
Wesztergom, Viktor
Madar, Akos
Biro, Nikolett
Koban, Gergely
Illyes, Andras
Kovacs, Peter
Dalya, Zsuzsanna
Lkhagvadorj, Munkhjargal
description We compare the predictions of the GUMICS\(-\)4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth's magnetosphere with Cluster~SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the north/south component of the magnetic field (\(B_{z}\)) seen by the magnetometer, the component of the velocity along the Sun-Earth line (\(V_{x}\)), and the plasma density as determined from a top hat plasma spectrometer and the spacecraft's potential from the electric field instrument. We select intervals in the solar wind, the magnetosheath, and the magnetosphere where these instruments provided good-quality data, and the model correctly predicted the region in which the spacecraft is located. We determine the location of the bow shock, the magnetopause, and the neutral sheet from the spacecraft measurements and compare these locations to those predicted by the simulation. The GUMICS\(-\)4 model agrees well with the measurements in the solar wind however its accuracy is worse in the magnetosheath. The simulation results are not realistic in the magnetosphere. The bow shock location is predicted well, however, the magnetopause location is less accurate. The neutral sheet positions are located quite accurately thanks to the special solar wind conditions when the \(B_{y}\) component of the interplanetary magnetic field is small.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2305.03478
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2305_03478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811048803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a523-a454493b21e8c6e98b6788020815d679da33d15b8bbb4708570b11c64e6cbe6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1PAjEYhBsTEwnyAzzZxPNiv7cczUbRBOJBPK8tvEDJfvm2q_LvXcHTXCYz8wwhN5xNldWa3Tv8CV9TIZmeMqlye0FGQkqeWSXEFZnEeGCMCZMLreWIfBRt3TkMzY7y7AgO6fx9-VK8ZYrGUPeVS6FtIm23NO2BrgARYsLgKrp0uwZSG7s9INDvkPa0qPqYAOkSXOwRamhSvCaXW1dFmPzrmKyeHlfFc7Z4nb8UD4vMaSEzp7RSM-kFB7s2MLPe5NYywSzXG5PPNk7KDdfeeu9VzqzOmed8bRSYtQezlWNye4494Zcdhtrhsfy7oTzdMDjuzo4O289-oCgPbY_NsKkUlnOmhj4pfwFvi1-a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811048803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Facsko, Gabor ; Sibeck, David ; Honkonen, Ilja ; Bor, Jozsef ; German Farinas Perez ; Timar, Aniko ; Shprits, Yuri ; Peitso, Pyry ; Degener, Laura ; Tanskanen, Eija ; Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu ; Szalai, Sandor ; Kis, Arpad ; Wesztergom, Viktor ; Madar, Akos ; Biro, Nikolett ; Koban, Gergely ; Illyes, Andras ; Kovacs, Peter ; Dalya, Zsuzsanna ; Lkhagvadorj, Munkhjargal</creator><creatorcontrib>Facsko, Gabor ; Sibeck, David ; Honkonen, Ilja ; Bor, Jozsef ; German Farinas Perez ; Timar, Aniko ; Shprits, Yuri ; Peitso, Pyry ; Degener, Laura ; Tanskanen, Eija ; Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu ; Szalai, Sandor ; Kis, Arpad ; Wesztergom, Viktor ; Madar, Akos ; Biro, Nikolett ; Koban, Gergely ; Illyes, Andras ; Kovacs, Peter ; Dalya, Zsuzsanna ; Lkhagvadorj, Munkhjargal</creatorcontrib><description>We compare the predictions of the GUMICS\(-\)4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth's magnetosphere with Cluster~SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the north/south component of the magnetic field (\(B_{z}\)) seen by the magnetometer, the component of the velocity along the Sun-Earth line (\(V_{x}\)), and the plasma density as determined from a top hat plasma spectrometer and the spacecraft's potential from the electric field instrument. We select intervals in the solar wind, the magnetosheath, and the magnetosphere where these instruments provided good-quality data, and the model correctly predicted the region in which the spacecraft is located. We determine the location of the bow shock, the magnetopause, and the neutral sheet from the spacecraft measurements and compare these locations to those predicted by the simulation. The GUMICS\(-\)4 model agrees well with the measurements in the solar wind however its accuracy is worse in the magnetosheath. The simulation results are not realistic in the magnetosphere. The bow shock location is predicted well, however, the magnetopause location is less accurate. The neutral sheet positions are located quite accurately thanks to the special solar wind conditions when the \(B_{y}\) component of the interplanetary magnetic field is small.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2305.03478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Clusters ; Earth magnetosphere ; Electric fields ; Interplanetary magnetic field ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetometers ; Magnetopause ; Magnetosheath ; Neutral sheets ; Physics - Space Physics ; Plasma density ; Simulation ; Solar wind ; Spacecraft</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-05</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,784,885,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10507311.1$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.03478$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Facsko, Gabor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibeck, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkonen, Ilja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bor, Jozsef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>German Farinas Perez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timar, Aniko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shprits, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peitso, Pyry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degener, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanskanen, Eija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szalai, Sandor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kis, Arpad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesztergom, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madar, Akos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biro, Nikolett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koban, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illyes, Andras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalya, Zsuzsanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lkhagvadorj, Munkhjargal</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>We compare the predictions of the GUMICS\(-\)4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth's magnetosphere with Cluster~SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the north/south component of the magnetic field (\(B_{z}\)) seen by the magnetometer, the component of the velocity along the Sun-Earth line (\(V_{x}\)), and the plasma density as determined from a top hat plasma spectrometer and the spacecraft's potential from the electric field instrument. We select intervals in the solar wind, the magnetosheath, and the magnetosphere where these instruments provided good-quality data, and the model correctly predicted the region in which the spacecraft is located. We determine the location of the bow shock, the magnetopause, and the neutral sheet from the spacecraft measurements and compare these locations to those predicted by the simulation. The GUMICS\(-\)4 model agrees well with the measurements in the solar wind however its accuracy is worse in the magnetosheath. The simulation results are not realistic in the magnetosphere. The bow shock location is predicted well, however, the magnetopause location is less accurate. The neutral sheet positions are located quite accurately thanks to the special solar wind conditions when the \(B_{y}\) component of the interplanetary magnetic field is small.</description><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Earth magnetosphere</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Interplanetary magnetic field</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetometers</subject><subject>Magnetopause</subject><subject>Magnetosheath</subject><subject>Neutral sheets</subject><subject>Physics - Space Physics</subject><subject>Plasma density</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Solar wind</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1PAjEYhBsTEwnyAzzZxPNiv7cczUbRBOJBPK8tvEDJfvm2q_LvXcHTXCYz8wwhN5xNldWa3Tv8CV9TIZmeMqlye0FGQkqeWSXEFZnEeGCMCZMLreWIfBRt3TkMzY7y7AgO6fx9-VK8ZYrGUPeVS6FtIm23NO2BrgARYsLgKrp0uwZSG7s9INDvkPa0qPqYAOkSXOwRamhSvCaXW1dFmPzrmKyeHlfFc7Z4nb8UD4vMaSEzp7RSM-kFB7s2MLPe5NYywSzXG5PPNk7KDdfeeu9VzqzOmed8bRSYtQezlWNye4494Zcdhtrhsfy7oTzdMDjuzo4O289-oCgPbY_NsKkUlnOmhj4pfwFvi1-a</recordid><startdate>20230505</startdate><enddate>20230505</enddate><creator>Facsko, Gabor</creator><creator>Sibeck, David</creator><creator>Honkonen, Ilja</creator><creator>Bor, Jozsef</creator><creator>German Farinas Perez</creator><creator>Timar, Aniko</creator><creator>Shprits, Yuri</creator><creator>Peitso, Pyry</creator><creator>Degener, Laura</creator><creator>Tanskanen, Eija</creator><creator>Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu</creator><creator>Szalai, Sandor</creator><creator>Kis, Arpad</creator><creator>Wesztergom, Viktor</creator><creator>Madar, Akos</creator><creator>Biro, Nikolett</creator><creator>Koban, Gergely</creator><creator>Illyes, Andras</creator><creator>Kovacs, Peter</creator><creator>Dalya, Zsuzsanna</creator><creator>Lkhagvadorj, Munkhjargal</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230505</creationdate><title>Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements</title><author>Facsko, Gabor ; Sibeck, David ; Honkonen, Ilja ; Bor, Jozsef ; German Farinas Perez ; Timar, Aniko ; Shprits, Yuri ; Peitso, Pyry ; Degener, Laura ; Tanskanen, Eija ; Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu ; Szalai, Sandor ; Kis, Arpad ; Wesztergom, Viktor ; Madar, Akos ; Biro, Nikolett ; Koban, Gergely ; Illyes, Andras ; Kovacs, Peter ; Dalya, Zsuzsanna ; Lkhagvadorj, Munkhjargal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a523-a454493b21e8c6e98b6788020815d679da33d15b8bbb4708570b11c64e6cbe6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Earth magnetosphere</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Interplanetary magnetic field</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetometers</topic><topic>Magnetopause</topic><topic>Magnetosheath</topic><topic>Neutral sheets</topic><topic>Physics - Space Physics</topic><topic>Plasma density</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Solar wind</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Facsko, Gabor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibeck, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkonen, Ilja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bor, Jozsef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>German Farinas Perez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timar, Aniko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shprits, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peitso, Pyry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degener, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanskanen, Eija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szalai, Sandor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kis, Arpad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesztergom, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madar, Akos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biro, Nikolett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koban, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illyes, Andras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalya, Zsuzsanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lkhagvadorj, Munkhjargal</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Facsko, Gabor</au><au>Sibeck, David</au><au>Honkonen, Ilja</au><au>Bor, Jozsef</au><au>German Farinas Perez</au><au>Timar, Aniko</au><au>Shprits, Yuri</au><au>Peitso, Pyry</au><au>Degener, Laura</au><au>Tanskanen, Eija</au><au>Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu</au><au>Szalai, Sandor</au><au>Kis, Arpad</au><au>Wesztergom, Viktor</au><au>Madar, Akos</au><au>Biro, Nikolett</au><au>Koban, Gergely</au><au>Illyes, Andras</au><au>Kovacs, Peter</au><au>Dalya, Zsuzsanna</au><au>Lkhagvadorj, Munkhjargal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-05-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>We compare the predictions of the GUMICS\(-\)4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth's magnetosphere with Cluster~SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the north/south component of the magnetic field (\(B_{z}\)) seen by the magnetometer, the component of the velocity along the Sun-Earth line (\(V_{x}\)), and the plasma density as determined from a top hat plasma spectrometer and the spacecraft's potential from the electric field instrument. We select intervals in the solar wind, the magnetosheath, and the magnetosphere where these instruments provided good-quality data, and the model correctly predicted the region in which the spacecraft is located. We determine the location of the bow shock, the magnetopause, and the neutral sheet from the spacecraft measurements and compare these locations to those predicted by the simulation. The GUMICS\(-\)4 model agrees well with the measurements in the solar wind however its accuracy is worse in the magnetosheath. The simulation results are not realistic in the magnetosphere. The bow shock location is predicted well, however, the magnetopause location is less accurate. The neutral sheet positions are located quite accurately thanks to the special solar wind conditions when the \(B_{y}\) component of the interplanetary magnetic field is small.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2305.03478</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2023-05
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2305_03478
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Clusters
Earth magnetosphere
Electric fields
Interplanetary magnetic field
Magnetic fields
Magnetometers
Magnetopause
Magnetosheath
Neutral sheets
Physics - Space Physics
Plasma density
Simulation
Solar wind
Spacecraft
title Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A00%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%201-year%20GUMICS-4%20simulations%20of%20the%20Terrestrial%20Magnetosphere%20with%20Cluster%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Facsko,%20Gabor&rft.date=2023-05-05&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2305.03478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2811048803%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811048803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true