A blue sky bifurcation in the dynamics of political candidates
Political candidates often shift their positions opportunistically in hopes of capturing more votes. When there are only two candidates, the best strategy for each of them is often to move towards the other. This eventually results in two centrists with coalescing views. However, the strategy of mov...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Political candidates often shift their positions opportunistically in hopes
of capturing more votes. When there are only two candidates, the best strategy
for each of them is often to move towards the other. This eventually results in
two centrists with coalescing views. However, the strategy of moving towards
the other candidate ceases to be optimal when enough voters abstain instead of
voting for a centrist who does not represent their views. These observations,
formalized in various ways, have been made many times. Our own formalization is
based on differential equations. The surprise and main result derived from
these equations is that the final candidate positions can jump discontinuously
as the voters' loyalty towards their candidate wanes. The underlying
mathematical mechanism is a blue sky bifurcation. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2302.07993 |