On the minimum modulus problem in number fields

The minimum modulus problem on covering systems was posed by Erd\H{o}s in 1950, who asked whether the minimum modulus of a covering system with distinct moduli is bounded. In 2007, Filaseta, Ford, Konyagin, Pomerance and Yu affirmed it if the reciprocal sum of the moduli of a covering system is boun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Li, Huixi, Wang, Biao, Yi, Shaoyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Li, Huixi
Wang, Biao
Yi, Shaoyun
description The minimum modulus problem on covering systems was posed by Erd\H{o}s in 1950, who asked whether the minimum modulus of a covering system with distinct moduli is bounded. In 2007, Filaseta, Ford, Konyagin, Pomerance and Yu affirmed it if the reciprocal sum of the moduli of a covering system is bounded. Later in 2015, Hough resolved this problem by showing that the minimum modulus is at most $10^{16}$. In 2022, Balister, Bollob\'as, Morris, Sahasrabudhe and Tiba reduced this bound to $616,000$ by developing a versatile method called the distortion method. Recently, Klein, Koukoulopoulos and Lemieux generalized Hough's result by using this method. In this paper, we develop the distortion method by introducing the theory of probability measures associated to an inverse system. Following Klein et al.'s work, we derive an analogue of their theorem in the setting of number fields, which provides a solution to Erd\H{o}s' minimum modulus problem in number fields.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2302.05946
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2302_05946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2302_05946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a676-2889de66d2926c4688e69c11f734662410a6c747b2b93e18180edb917bf118963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzrFOwzAUQFEvHVDLBzDVP5DUz3ae7RFVFJAqdeke2fGLsBQnkUMQ_XtEYbrb1WHsCUStbdOIgy_f6auWSshaNE7jAztcRv75QTynMeU18zzFdVgXPpcpDJR5Gvm45kCF94mGuOzYpvfDQo__3bLr6eV6fKvOl9f34_O58miwkta6SIhROomdRmsJXQfQG6URpQbhsTPaBBmcIrBgBcXgwIQewDpUW7b_297F7VxS9uXW_srbu1z9AIKzPDU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the minimum modulus problem in number fields</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Li, Huixi ; Wang, Biao ; Yi, Shaoyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Huixi ; Wang, Biao ; Yi, Shaoyun</creatorcontrib><description>The minimum modulus problem on covering systems was posed by Erd\H{o}s in 1950, who asked whether the minimum modulus of a covering system with distinct moduli is bounded. In 2007, Filaseta, Ford, Konyagin, Pomerance and Yu affirmed it if the reciprocal sum of the moduli of a covering system is bounded. Later in 2015, Hough resolved this problem by showing that the minimum modulus is at most $10^{16}$. In 2022, Balister, Bollob\'as, Morris, Sahasrabudhe and Tiba reduced this bound to $616,000$ by developing a versatile method called the distortion method. Recently, Klein, Koukoulopoulos and Lemieux generalized Hough's result by using this method. In this paper, we develop the distortion method by introducing the theory of probability measures associated to an inverse system. Following Klein et al.'s work, we derive an analogue of their theorem in the setting of number fields, which provides a solution to Erd\H{o}s' minimum modulus problem in number fields.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.05946</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Mathematics - Number Theory</subject><creationdate>2023-02</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05946$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.05946$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Huixi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Shaoyun</creatorcontrib><title>On the minimum modulus problem in number fields</title><description>The minimum modulus problem on covering systems was posed by Erd\H{o}s in 1950, who asked whether the minimum modulus of a covering system with distinct moduli is bounded. In 2007, Filaseta, Ford, Konyagin, Pomerance and Yu affirmed it if the reciprocal sum of the moduli of a covering system is bounded. Later in 2015, Hough resolved this problem by showing that the minimum modulus is at most $10^{16}$. In 2022, Balister, Bollob\'as, Morris, Sahasrabudhe and Tiba reduced this bound to $616,000$ by developing a versatile method called the distortion method. Recently, Klein, Koukoulopoulos and Lemieux generalized Hough's result by using this method. In this paper, we develop the distortion method by introducing the theory of probability measures associated to an inverse system. Following Klein et al.'s work, we derive an analogue of their theorem in the setting of number fields, which provides a solution to Erd\H{o}s' minimum modulus problem in number fields.</description><subject>Mathematics - Number Theory</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzrFOwzAUQFEvHVDLBzDVP5DUz3ae7RFVFJAqdeke2fGLsBQnkUMQ_XtEYbrb1WHsCUStbdOIgy_f6auWSshaNE7jAztcRv75QTynMeU18zzFdVgXPpcpDJR5Gvm45kCF94mGuOzYpvfDQo__3bLr6eV6fKvOl9f34_O58miwkta6SIhROomdRmsJXQfQG6URpQbhsTPaBBmcIrBgBcXgwIQewDpUW7b_297F7VxS9uXW_srbu1z9AIKzPDU</recordid><startdate>20230212</startdate><enddate>20230212</enddate><creator>Li, Huixi</creator><creator>Wang, Biao</creator><creator>Yi, Shaoyun</creator><scope>AKZ</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230212</creationdate><title>On the minimum modulus problem in number fields</title><author>Li, Huixi ; Wang, Biao ; Yi, Shaoyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a676-2889de66d2926c4688e69c11f734662410a6c747b2b93e18180edb917bf118963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Mathematics - Number Theory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Huixi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Shaoyun</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Mathematics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Huixi</au><au>Wang, Biao</au><au>Yi, Shaoyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the minimum modulus problem in number fields</atitle><date>2023-02-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>The minimum modulus problem on covering systems was posed by Erd\H{o}s in 1950, who asked whether the minimum modulus of a covering system with distinct moduli is bounded. In 2007, Filaseta, Ford, Konyagin, Pomerance and Yu affirmed it if the reciprocal sum of the moduli of a covering system is bounded. Later in 2015, Hough resolved this problem by showing that the minimum modulus is at most $10^{16}$. In 2022, Balister, Bollob\'as, Morris, Sahasrabudhe and Tiba reduced this bound to $616,000$ by developing a versatile method called the distortion method. Recently, Klein, Koukoulopoulos and Lemieux generalized Hough's result by using this method. In this paper, we develop the distortion method by introducing the theory of probability measures associated to an inverse system. Following Klein et al.'s work, we derive an analogue of their theorem in the setting of number fields, which provides a solution to Erd\H{o}s' minimum modulus problem in number fields.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2302.05946</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.05946
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2302_05946
source arXiv.org
subjects Mathematics - Number Theory
title On the minimum modulus problem in number fields
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A18%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20minimum%20modulus%20problem%20in%20number%20fields&rft.au=Li,%20Huixi&rft.date=2023-02-12&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2302.05946&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2302_05946%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true