State of the Art Study of the Safety Argumentation Frameworks for Automated Driving System Safety

The automotive industry is experiencing a transition from assisted to highly automated driving. New concepts for validation of Automated Driving System (ADS) include amongst other a shift from a "technology based" approach to a "scenario based" assessment. The safety validation a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-01
Hauptverfasser: Cieslik, Ilona, Expósito Jiménez, Víctor J, Martin, Helmut, Scharke, Heiko, Schneider, Hannes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Cieslik, Ilona
Expósito Jiménez, Víctor J
Martin, Helmut
Scharke, Heiko
Schneider, Hannes
description The automotive industry is experiencing a transition from assisted to highly automated driving. New concepts for validation of Automated Driving System (ADS) include amongst other a shift from a "technology based" approach to a "scenario based" assessment. The safety validation and type approval process of ADS are seen as the biggest challenges for the automotive industry today. Having in mind a variety of existing white papers, standardization activities and regulatory approaches, manufactures still struggle with selecting the best practices that keep aligned with their Safety Management System and Safety Culture. A step forward would be to implement a harmonized global safety assurance scheme that is compliant with relevant regulations, laws, standards, and reflects local rules. Today many communities (regulatory bodies, local authorities, industrial stake-holders) work on proof-of-concept framework for the Safety Argumentation as an answer to this problem. Unfortunately, there is still no consensus on one definitive methodology and a set of safety metrics to measure ADS safety. An objective of this summary report is to facilitate a comprehensive review and analysis of the literature concerning available methods and approaches for vehicle safety, engineering frameworks, processes of scenario-based evaluation and a vendor- and technology-neutral Safety Argumentation approaches and tools.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2302.00437
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2302_00437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2771815675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a525-7c66f0d1b252178fcf9a7973be257298b50b40363edabbf28cb55c5355c0c54a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMFOwzAQRC0kJKrSD-CEJc4JzjobJ8eoUIpUiUN6j-zELikkLo5TyN8T2nLZlUZvRztDyF3EwjhFZI_S_TTHEDiDkLGYiysyA86jII0Bbsii7_eMMUgEIPIZkYWXXlNrqH_XNHeeFn6ox3-hkEb7cdJ3Q6u7CW1sR1dOtvrbuo-eGutoPnjbTiY1fXLNsel2tBh7r9vL8S25NvKz14vLnpPt6nm7XAebt5fXZb4JJAIGokoSw-pIAUIkUlOZTIpMcKUBBWSpQqZixhOua6mUgbRSiBXyabAKY8nn5P5se8pfHlzTSjeWfz2Upx4m4uFMHJz9GnTvy70dXDf9VIIQURphIpD_AjaEYIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2771815675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State of the Art Study of the Safety Argumentation Frameworks for Automated Driving System Safety</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Cieslik, Ilona ; Expósito Jiménez, Víctor J ; Martin, Helmut ; Scharke, Heiko ; Schneider, Hannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Cieslik, Ilona ; Expósito Jiménez, Víctor J ; Martin, Helmut ; Scharke, Heiko ; Schneider, Hannes</creatorcontrib><description>The automotive industry is experiencing a transition from assisted to highly automated driving. New concepts for validation of Automated Driving System (ADS) include amongst other a shift from a "technology based" approach to a "scenario based" assessment. The safety validation and type approval process of ADS are seen as the biggest challenges for the automotive industry today. Having in mind a variety of existing white papers, standardization activities and regulatory approaches, manufactures still struggle with selecting the best practices that keep aligned with their Safety Management System and Safety Culture. A step forward would be to implement a harmonized global safety assurance scheme that is compliant with relevant regulations, laws, standards, and reflects local rules. Today many communities (regulatory bodies, local authorities, industrial stake-holders) work on proof-of-concept framework for the Safety Argumentation as an answer to this problem. Unfortunately, there is still no consensus on one definitive methodology and a set of safety metrics to measure ADS safety. An objective of this summary report is to facilitate a comprehensive review and analysis of the literature concerning available methods and approaches for vehicle safety, engineering frameworks, processes of scenario-based evaluation and a vendor- and technology-neutral Safety Argumentation approaches and tools.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.00437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Automation ; Automobile industry ; Best practice ; Computer Science - Software Engineering ; Industrial safety ; Safety management ; State-of-the-art reviews ; Vehicle safety</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-01</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14862-0_14$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.00437$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cieslik, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Expósito Jiménez, Víctor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharke, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Hannes</creatorcontrib><title>State of the Art Study of the Safety Argumentation Frameworks for Automated Driving System Safety</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>The automotive industry is experiencing a transition from assisted to highly automated driving. New concepts for validation of Automated Driving System (ADS) include amongst other a shift from a "technology based" approach to a "scenario based" assessment. The safety validation and type approval process of ADS are seen as the biggest challenges for the automotive industry today. Having in mind a variety of existing white papers, standardization activities and regulatory approaches, manufactures still struggle with selecting the best practices that keep aligned with their Safety Management System and Safety Culture. A step forward would be to implement a harmonized global safety assurance scheme that is compliant with relevant regulations, laws, standards, and reflects local rules. Today many communities (regulatory bodies, local authorities, industrial stake-holders) work on proof-of-concept framework for the Safety Argumentation as an answer to this problem. Unfortunately, there is still no consensus on one definitive methodology and a set of safety metrics to measure ADS safety. An objective of this summary report is to facilitate a comprehensive review and analysis of the literature concerning available methods and approaches for vehicle safety, engineering frameworks, processes of scenario-based evaluation and a vendor- and technology-neutral Safety Argumentation approaches and tools.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Computer Science - Software Engineering</subject><subject>Industrial safety</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>State-of-the-art reviews</subject><subject>Vehicle safety</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMFOwzAQRC0kJKrSD-CEJc4JzjobJ8eoUIpUiUN6j-zELikkLo5TyN8T2nLZlUZvRztDyF3EwjhFZI_S_TTHEDiDkLGYiysyA86jII0Bbsii7_eMMUgEIPIZkYWXXlNrqH_XNHeeFn6ox3-hkEb7cdJ3Q6u7CW1sR1dOtvrbuo-eGutoPnjbTiY1fXLNsel2tBh7r9vL8S25NvKz14vLnpPt6nm7XAebt5fXZb4JJAIGokoSw-pIAUIkUlOZTIpMcKUBBWSpQqZixhOua6mUgbRSiBXyabAKY8nn5P5se8pfHlzTSjeWfz2Upx4m4uFMHJz9GnTvy70dXDf9VIIQURphIpD_AjaEYIA</recordid><startdate>20230131</startdate><enddate>20230131</enddate><creator>Cieslik, Ilona</creator><creator>Expósito Jiménez, Víctor J</creator><creator>Martin, Helmut</creator><creator>Scharke, Heiko</creator><creator>Schneider, Hannes</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230131</creationdate><title>State of the Art Study of the Safety Argumentation Frameworks for Automated Driving System Safety</title><author>Cieslik, Ilona ; Expósito Jiménez, Víctor J ; Martin, Helmut ; Scharke, Heiko ; Schneider, Hannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a525-7c66f0d1b252178fcf9a7973be257298b50b40363edabbf28cb55c5355c0c54a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Computer Science - Software Engineering</topic><topic>Industrial safety</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>State-of-the-art reviews</topic><topic>Vehicle safety</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cieslik, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Expósito Jiménez, Víctor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharke, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Hannes</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cieslik, Ilona</au><au>Expósito Jiménez, Víctor J</au><au>Martin, Helmut</au><au>Scharke, Heiko</au><au>Schneider, Hannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State of the Art Study of the Safety Argumentation Frameworks for Automated Driving System Safety</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-01-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>The automotive industry is experiencing a transition from assisted to highly automated driving. New concepts for validation of Automated Driving System (ADS) include amongst other a shift from a "technology based" approach to a "scenario based" assessment. The safety validation and type approval process of ADS are seen as the biggest challenges for the automotive industry today. Having in mind a variety of existing white papers, standardization activities and regulatory approaches, manufactures still struggle with selecting the best practices that keep aligned with their Safety Management System and Safety Culture. A step forward would be to implement a harmonized global safety assurance scheme that is compliant with relevant regulations, laws, standards, and reflects local rules. Today many communities (regulatory bodies, local authorities, industrial stake-holders) work on proof-of-concept framework for the Safety Argumentation as an answer to this problem. Unfortunately, there is still no consensus on one definitive methodology and a set of safety metrics to measure ADS safety. An objective of this summary report is to facilitate a comprehensive review and analysis of the literature concerning available methods and approaches for vehicle safety, engineering frameworks, processes of scenario-based evaluation and a vendor- and technology-neutral Safety Argumentation approaches and tools.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2302.00437</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2023-01
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2302_00437
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Automation
Automobile industry
Best practice
Computer Science - Software Engineering
Industrial safety
Safety management
State-of-the-art reviews
Vehicle safety
title State of the Art Study of the Safety Argumentation Frameworks for Automated Driving System Safety
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A52%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20of%20the%20Art%20Study%20of%20the%20Safety%20Argumentation%20Frameworks%20for%20Automated%20Driving%20System%20Safety&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Cieslik,%20Ilona&rft.date=2023-01-31&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2302.00437&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2771815675%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2771815675&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true