Implicit variance regularization in non-contrastive SSL

Non-contrastive SSL methods like BYOL and SimSiam rely on asymmetric predictor networks to avoid representational collapse without negative samples. Yet, how predictor networks facilitate stable learning is not fully understood. While previous theoretical analyses assumed Euclidean losses, most prac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Halvagal, Manu Srinath, Laborieux, Axel, Zenke, Friedemann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Halvagal, Manu Srinath
Laborieux, Axel
Zenke, Friedemann
description Non-contrastive SSL methods like BYOL and SimSiam rely on asymmetric predictor networks to avoid representational collapse without negative samples. Yet, how predictor networks facilitate stable learning is not fully understood. While previous theoretical analyses assumed Euclidean losses, most practical implementations rely on cosine similarity. To gain further theoretical insight into non-contrastive SSL, we analytically study learning dynamics in conjunction with Euclidean and cosine similarity in the eigenspace of closed-form linear predictor networks. We show that both avoid collapse through implicit variance regularization albeit through different dynamical mechanisms. Moreover, we find that the eigenvalues act as effective learning rate multipliers and propose a family of isotropic loss functions (IsoLoss) that equalize convergence rates across eigenmodes. Empirically, IsoLoss speeds up the initial learning dynamics and increases robustness, thereby allowing us to dispense with the EMA target network typically used with non-contrastive methods. Our analysis sheds light on the variance regularization mechanisms of non-contrastive SSL and lays the theoretical grounds for crafting novel loss functions that shape the learning dynamics of the predictor's spectrum.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2212.04858
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2212_04858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2212_04858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a678-bc9ab43a830afd6d3c19642ee6df5ed20ee1156e258063cae3b47679a02c77423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tuwjAURL1hUUE_oKv6BxL8trNECFqkSCxgH904N5Wl4CATIuDry2s1mlkczSHki7NcOa3ZHNIljLkQXOTsvrgPYjeHYxd8GOgIKUD0SBP-nbt7ucEQ-khDpLGPme_jkOA0hBHpblfOyKSF7oSf75yS_Xq1X_5m5fZns1yUGRjrstoXUCsJTjJoG9NIzwujBKJpWo2NYIica4NCO2akB5S1ssYWwIS3Vgk5Jd8v7PN5dUzhAOlaPQyqp4H8B7A4QPM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit variance regularization in non-contrastive SSL</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Halvagal, Manu Srinath ; Laborieux, Axel ; Zenke, Friedemann</creator><creatorcontrib>Halvagal, Manu Srinath ; Laborieux, Axel ; Zenke, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><description>Non-contrastive SSL methods like BYOL and SimSiam rely on asymmetric predictor networks to avoid representational collapse without negative samples. Yet, how predictor networks facilitate stable learning is not fully understood. While previous theoretical analyses assumed Euclidean losses, most practical implementations rely on cosine similarity. To gain further theoretical insight into non-contrastive SSL, we analytically study learning dynamics in conjunction with Euclidean and cosine similarity in the eigenspace of closed-form linear predictor networks. We show that both avoid collapse through implicit variance regularization albeit through different dynamical mechanisms. Moreover, we find that the eigenvalues act as effective learning rate multipliers and propose a family of isotropic loss functions (IsoLoss) that equalize convergence rates across eigenmodes. Empirically, IsoLoss speeds up the initial learning dynamics and increases robustness, thereby allowing us to dispense with the EMA target network typically used with non-contrastive methods. Our analysis sheds light on the variance regularization mechanisms of non-contrastive SSL and lays the theoretical grounds for crafting novel loss functions that shape the learning dynamics of the predictor's spectrum.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2212.04858</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science - Learning ; Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing</subject><creationdate>2022-12</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04858$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.04858$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halvagal, Manu Srinath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laborieux, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenke, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit variance regularization in non-contrastive SSL</title><description>Non-contrastive SSL methods like BYOL and SimSiam rely on asymmetric predictor networks to avoid representational collapse without negative samples. Yet, how predictor networks facilitate stable learning is not fully understood. While previous theoretical analyses assumed Euclidean losses, most practical implementations rely on cosine similarity. To gain further theoretical insight into non-contrastive SSL, we analytically study learning dynamics in conjunction with Euclidean and cosine similarity in the eigenspace of closed-form linear predictor networks. We show that both avoid collapse through implicit variance regularization albeit through different dynamical mechanisms. Moreover, we find that the eigenvalues act as effective learning rate multipliers and propose a family of isotropic loss functions (IsoLoss) that equalize convergence rates across eigenmodes. Empirically, IsoLoss speeds up the initial learning dynamics and increases robustness, thereby allowing us to dispense with the EMA target network typically used with non-contrastive methods. Our analysis sheds light on the variance regularization mechanisms of non-contrastive SSL and lays the theoretical grounds for crafting novel loss functions that shape the learning dynamics of the predictor's spectrum.</description><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science - Learning</subject><subject>Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tuwjAURL1hUUE_oKv6BxL8trNECFqkSCxgH904N5Wl4CATIuDry2s1mlkczSHki7NcOa3ZHNIljLkQXOTsvrgPYjeHYxd8GOgIKUD0SBP-nbt7ucEQ-khDpLGPme_jkOA0hBHpblfOyKSF7oSf75yS_Xq1X_5m5fZns1yUGRjrstoXUCsJTjJoG9NIzwujBKJpWo2NYIica4NCO2akB5S1ssYWwIS3Vgk5Jd8v7PN5dUzhAOlaPQyqp4H8B7A4QPM</recordid><startdate>20221209</startdate><enddate>20221209</enddate><creator>Halvagal, Manu Srinath</creator><creator>Laborieux, Axel</creator><creator>Zenke, Friedemann</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221209</creationdate><title>Implicit variance regularization in non-contrastive SSL</title><author>Halvagal, Manu Srinath ; Laborieux, Axel ; Zenke, Friedemann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a678-bc9ab43a830afd6d3c19642ee6df5ed20ee1156e258063cae3b47679a02c77423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science - Learning</topic><topic>Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halvagal, Manu Srinath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laborieux, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenke, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halvagal, Manu Srinath</au><au>Laborieux, Axel</au><au>Zenke, Friedemann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit variance regularization in non-contrastive SSL</atitle><date>2022-12-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Non-contrastive SSL methods like BYOL and SimSiam rely on asymmetric predictor networks to avoid representational collapse without negative samples. Yet, how predictor networks facilitate stable learning is not fully understood. While previous theoretical analyses assumed Euclidean losses, most practical implementations rely on cosine similarity. To gain further theoretical insight into non-contrastive SSL, we analytically study learning dynamics in conjunction with Euclidean and cosine similarity in the eigenspace of closed-form linear predictor networks. We show that both avoid collapse through implicit variance regularization albeit through different dynamical mechanisms. Moreover, we find that the eigenvalues act as effective learning rate multipliers and propose a family of isotropic loss functions (IsoLoss) that equalize convergence rates across eigenmodes. Empirically, IsoLoss speeds up the initial learning dynamics and increases robustness, thereby allowing us to dispense with the EMA target network typically used with non-contrastive methods. Our analysis sheds light on the variance regularization mechanisms of non-contrastive SSL and lays the theoretical grounds for crafting novel loss functions that shape the learning dynamics of the predictor's spectrum.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2212.04858</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2212.04858
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2212_04858
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science - Learning
Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing
title Implicit variance regularization in non-contrastive SSL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A53%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20variance%20regularization%20in%20non-contrastive%20SSL&rft.au=Halvagal,%20Manu%20Srinath&rft.date=2022-12-09&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2212.04858&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2212_04858%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true