Determination of 1929 Asteroid Rotation Periods from WISE Data

We used 22 $\mu$m (W4) Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) observations of 4420 asteroids to analyze lightcurves and determined spin period estimates for 1929 asteroids. We fit second-order Fourier models at a large number of trial frequencies to the W4 data and analyzed the resulting periodo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lam, Adrian L. H, Margot, Jean-Luc, Whittaker, Emily, Myhrvold, Nathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Lam, Adrian L. H
Margot, Jean-Luc
Whittaker, Emily
Myhrvold, Nathan
description We used 22 $\mu$m (W4) Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) observations of 4420 asteroids to analyze lightcurves and determined spin period estimates for 1929 asteroids. We fit second-order Fourier models at a large number of trial frequencies to the W4 data and analyzed the resulting periodograms. We initially excluded rotational frequencies exceeding 7.57 rotations per day (P < 3.17 hr), which are not sampled adequately by WISE, and periods that exceed twice the WISE observation interval, which is typically 36 hr. Three solutions accurately capture the vast majority of the rotational frequencies in our sample: the best-fit frequency and its mirrors around 3.78 and 7.57 rotations per day. By comparing our solutions to a high-quality control group of 752 asteroid spin periods, we found that one of our solutions is accurate (within 5%) in 88% of the cases. The best-fit, secondary, and tertiary solutions are accurate in 55%, 27%, and 6% of the cases, respectively. We also observed that suppression of aliased solutions was more effective with non-uniform sampling than with quasi-uniform sampling.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2211.16409
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2211_16409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211_16409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a679-42f3f6b1680c274f6832e612970c385d9b837080e5880c085d517ca0165833a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81qAjEUhbPpQmwfwFXzAjO9N5n8bQRRWwWhpQouh-tMAgHHlMxQ2rfvVF0d-M7hwMfYDKGsrFLwQvknfpdCIJaoK3ATNl_5wecuXmiI6cJT4OiE44t-pCm2_DMNt-bD55janoecOn7c7td8RQM9sodA594_3XPKDq_rw3JT7N7ftsvFriBtXFGJIIM-obbQCFMFbaXwGoUz0EirWney0oAFr-y4gJEoNA0BamWlJCOn7Pl2exWov3LsKP_W_yL1VUT-ARqFP-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of 1929 Asteroid Rotation Periods from WISE Data</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Lam, Adrian L. H ; Margot, Jean-Luc ; Whittaker, Emily ; Myhrvold, Nathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lam, Adrian L. H ; Margot, Jean-Luc ; Whittaker, Emily ; Myhrvold, Nathan</creatorcontrib><description>We used 22 $\mu$m (W4) Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) observations of 4420 asteroids to analyze lightcurves and determined spin period estimates for 1929 asteroids. We fit second-order Fourier models at a large number of trial frequencies to the W4 data and analyzed the resulting periodograms. We initially excluded rotational frequencies exceeding 7.57 rotations per day (P &lt; 3.17 hr), which are not sampled adequately by WISE, and periods that exceed twice the WISE observation interval, which is typically 36 hr. Three solutions accurately capture the vast majority of the rotational frequencies in our sample: the best-fit frequency and its mirrors around 3.78 and 7.57 rotations per day. By comparing our solutions to a high-quality control group of 752 asteroid spin periods, we found that one of our solutions is accurate (within 5%) in 88% of the cases. The best-fit, secondary, and tertiary solutions are accurate in 55%, 27%, and 6% of the cases, respectively. We also observed that suppression of aliased solutions was more effective with non-uniform sampling than with quasi-uniform sampling.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.16409</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics</subject><creationdate>2022-11</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16409$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.16409$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lam, Adrian L. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margot, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myhrvold, Nathan</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of 1929 Asteroid Rotation Periods from WISE Data</title><description>We used 22 $\mu$m (W4) Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) observations of 4420 asteroids to analyze lightcurves and determined spin period estimates for 1929 asteroids. We fit second-order Fourier models at a large number of trial frequencies to the W4 data and analyzed the resulting periodograms. We initially excluded rotational frequencies exceeding 7.57 rotations per day (P &lt; 3.17 hr), which are not sampled adequately by WISE, and periods that exceed twice the WISE observation interval, which is typically 36 hr. Three solutions accurately capture the vast majority of the rotational frequencies in our sample: the best-fit frequency and its mirrors around 3.78 and 7.57 rotations per day. By comparing our solutions to a high-quality control group of 752 asteroid spin periods, we found that one of our solutions is accurate (within 5%) in 88% of the cases. The best-fit, secondary, and tertiary solutions are accurate in 55%, 27%, and 6% of the cases, respectively. We also observed that suppression of aliased solutions was more effective with non-uniform sampling than with quasi-uniform sampling.</description><subject>Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj81qAjEUhbPpQmwfwFXzAjO9N5n8bQRRWwWhpQouh-tMAgHHlMxQ2rfvVF0d-M7hwMfYDKGsrFLwQvknfpdCIJaoK3ATNl_5wecuXmiI6cJT4OiE44t-pCm2_DMNt-bD55janoecOn7c7td8RQM9sodA594_3XPKDq_rw3JT7N7ftsvFriBtXFGJIIM-obbQCFMFbaXwGoUz0EirWney0oAFr-y4gJEoNA0BamWlJCOn7Pl2exWov3LsKP_W_yL1VUT-ARqFP-A</recordid><startdate>20221129</startdate><enddate>20221129</enddate><creator>Lam, Adrian L. H</creator><creator>Margot, Jean-Luc</creator><creator>Whittaker, Emily</creator><creator>Myhrvold, Nathan</creator><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221129</creationdate><title>Determination of 1929 Asteroid Rotation Periods from WISE Data</title><author>Lam, Adrian L. H ; Margot, Jean-Luc ; Whittaker, Emily ; Myhrvold, Nathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a679-42f3f6b1680c274f6832e612970c385d9b837080e5880c085d517ca0165833a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lam, Adrian L. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margot, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myhrvold, Nathan</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lam, Adrian L. H</au><au>Margot, Jean-Luc</au><au>Whittaker, Emily</au><au>Myhrvold, Nathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of 1929 Asteroid Rotation Periods from WISE Data</atitle><date>2022-11-29</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>We used 22 $\mu$m (W4) Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) observations of 4420 asteroids to analyze lightcurves and determined spin period estimates for 1929 asteroids. We fit second-order Fourier models at a large number of trial frequencies to the W4 data and analyzed the resulting periodograms. We initially excluded rotational frequencies exceeding 7.57 rotations per day (P &lt; 3.17 hr), which are not sampled adequately by WISE, and periods that exceed twice the WISE observation interval, which is typically 36 hr. Three solutions accurately capture the vast majority of the rotational frequencies in our sample: the best-fit frequency and its mirrors around 3.78 and 7.57 rotations per day. By comparing our solutions to a high-quality control group of 752 asteroid spin periods, we found that one of our solutions is accurate (within 5%) in 88% of the cases. The best-fit, secondary, and tertiary solutions are accurate in 55%, 27%, and 6% of the cases, respectively. We also observed that suppression of aliased solutions was more effective with non-uniform sampling than with quasi-uniform sampling.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2211.16409</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.16409
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2211_16409
source arXiv.org
subjects Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
title Determination of 1929 Asteroid Rotation Periods from WISE Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A26%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%201929%20Asteroid%20Rotation%20Periods%20from%20WISE%20Data&rft.au=Lam,%20Adrian%20L.%20H&rft.date=2022-11-29&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2211.16409&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2211_16409%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true