Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Causal Inference based ATM Fraud Detection

Gaining the trust of customers and providing them empathy are very critical in the financial domain. Frequent occurrence of fraudulent activities affects these two factors. Hence, financial organizations and banks must take utmost care to mitigate them. Among them, ATM fraudulent transaction is a co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Vivek, Yelleti, Ravi, Vadlamani, Mane, Abhay Anand, Naidu, Laveti Ramesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Vivek, Yelleti
Ravi, Vadlamani
Mane, Abhay Anand
Naidu, Laveti Ramesh
description Gaining the trust of customers and providing them empathy are very critical in the financial domain. Frequent occurrence of fraudulent activities affects these two factors. Hence, financial organizations and banks must take utmost care to mitigate them. Among them, ATM fraudulent transaction is a common problem faced by banks. There following are the critical challenges involved in fraud datasets: the dataset is highly imbalanced, the fraud pattern is changing, etc. Owing to the rarity of fraudulent activities, Fraud detection can be formulated as either a binary classification problem or One class classification (OCC). In this study, we handled these techniques on an ATM transactions dataset collected from India. In binary classification, we investigated the effectiveness of various over-sampling techniques, such as the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and its variants, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), to achieve oversampling. Further, we employed various machine learning techniques viz., Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT), Multi-layer perceptron (MLP). GBT outperformed the rest of the models by achieving 0.963 AUC, and DT stands second with 0.958 AUC. DT is the winner if the complexity and interpretability aspects are considered. Among all the oversampling approaches, SMOTE and its variants were observed to perform better. In OCC, IForest attained 0.959 CR, and OCSVM secured second place with 0.947 CR. Further, we incorporated explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and causal inference (CI) in the fraud detection framework and studied it through various analyses.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2211.10595
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2211_10595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211_10595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a675-c237c6b147fb5b6f53b8215583c6b0d8712205620db098b19b2ec53b66e4e1343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81KxDAURrNxIaMP4Mq8QGt-mjRdljqjAyOCdF9ukhsJxDikHRnf3rG6-uDwceAQcsdZ3Ril2AOUc_yqheC85kx16pq8bc_HBDGDTUj7ssQQXYRE93nBlOI7ZocUsqcDnOaVBywrtDCjp_34QncFTp4-4oJuiZ_5hlwFSDPe_u-GjLvtODxXh9en_dAfKtCtqpyQrdOWN22wyuqgpDWCK2XkhTJvWi4EU1owb1lnLO-sQHc5aY0NctnIDbn_065R07HEDyjf02_ctMbJH2juSN8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Causal Inference based ATM Fraud Detection</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Vivek, Yelleti ; Ravi, Vadlamani ; Mane, Abhay Anand ; Naidu, Laveti Ramesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Vivek, Yelleti ; Ravi, Vadlamani ; Mane, Abhay Anand ; Naidu, Laveti Ramesh</creatorcontrib><description>Gaining the trust of customers and providing them empathy are very critical in the financial domain. Frequent occurrence of fraudulent activities affects these two factors. Hence, financial organizations and banks must take utmost care to mitigate them. Among them, ATM fraudulent transaction is a common problem faced by banks. There following are the critical challenges involved in fraud datasets: the dataset is highly imbalanced, the fraud pattern is changing, etc. Owing to the rarity of fraudulent activities, Fraud detection can be formulated as either a binary classification problem or One class classification (OCC). In this study, we handled these techniques on an ATM transactions dataset collected from India. In binary classification, we investigated the effectiveness of various over-sampling techniques, such as the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and its variants, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), to achieve oversampling. Further, we employed various machine learning techniques viz., Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT), Multi-layer perceptron (MLP). GBT outperformed the rest of the models by achieving 0.963 AUC, and DT stands second with 0.958 AUC. DT is the winner if the complexity and interpretability aspects are considered. Among all the oversampling approaches, SMOTE and its variants were observed to perform better. In OCC, IForest attained 0.959 CR, and OCSVM secured second place with 0.947 CR. Further, we incorporated explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and causal inference (CI) in the fraud detection framework and studied it through various analyses.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.10595</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science - Learning</subject><creationdate>2022-11</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10595$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.10595$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vivek, Yelleti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Vadlamani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mane, Abhay Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naidu, Laveti Ramesh</creatorcontrib><title>Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Causal Inference based ATM Fraud Detection</title><description>Gaining the trust of customers and providing them empathy are very critical in the financial domain. Frequent occurrence of fraudulent activities affects these two factors. Hence, financial organizations and banks must take utmost care to mitigate them. Among them, ATM fraudulent transaction is a common problem faced by banks. There following are the critical challenges involved in fraud datasets: the dataset is highly imbalanced, the fraud pattern is changing, etc. Owing to the rarity of fraudulent activities, Fraud detection can be formulated as either a binary classification problem or One class classification (OCC). In this study, we handled these techniques on an ATM transactions dataset collected from India. In binary classification, we investigated the effectiveness of various over-sampling techniques, such as the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and its variants, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), to achieve oversampling. Further, we employed various machine learning techniques viz., Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT), Multi-layer perceptron (MLP). GBT outperformed the rest of the models by achieving 0.963 AUC, and DT stands second with 0.958 AUC. DT is the winner if the complexity and interpretability aspects are considered. Among all the oversampling approaches, SMOTE and its variants were observed to perform better. In OCC, IForest attained 0.959 CR, and OCSVM secured second place with 0.947 CR. Further, we incorporated explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and causal inference (CI) in the fraud detection framework and studied it through various analyses.</description><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science - Learning</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj81KxDAURrNxIaMP4Mq8QGt-mjRdljqjAyOCdF9ukhsJxDikHRnf3rG6-uDwceAQcsdZ3Ril2AOUc_yqheC85kx16pq8bc_HBDGDTUj7ssQQXYRE93nBlOI7ZocUsqcDnOaVBywrtDCjp_34QncFTp4-4oJuiZ_5hlwFSDPe_u-GjLvtODxXh9en_dAfKtCtqpyQrdOWN22wyuqgpDWCK2XkhTJvWi4EU1owb1lnLO-sQHc5aY0NctnIDbn_065R07HEDyjf02_ctMbJH2juSN8</recordid><startdate>20221119</startdate><enddate>20221119</enddate><creator>Vivek, Yelleti</creator><creator>Ravi, Vadlamani</creator><creator>Mane, Abhay Anand</creator><creator>Naidu, Laveti Ramesh</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221119</creationdate><title>Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Causal Inference based ATM Fraud Detection</title><author>Vivek, Yelleti ; Ravi, Vadlamani ; Mane, Abhay Anand ; Naidu, Laveti Ramesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a675-c237c6b147fb5b6f53b8215583c6b0d8712205620db098b19b2ec53b66e4e1343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science - Learning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vivek, Yelleti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Vadlamani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mane, Abhay Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naidu, Laveti Ramesh</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vivek, Yelleti</au><au>Ravi, Vadlamani</au><au>Mane, Abhay Anand</au><au>Naidu, Laveti Ramesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Causal Inference based ATM Fraud Detection</atitle><date>2022-11-19</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Gaining the trust of customers and providing them empathy are very critical in the financial domain. Frequent occurrence of fraudulent activities affects these two factors. Hence, financial organizations and banks must take utmost care to mitigate them. Among them, ATM fraudulent transaction is a common problem faced by banks. There following are the critical challenges involved in fraud datasets: the dataset is highly imbalanced, the fraud pattern is changing, etc. Owing to the rarity of fraudulent activities, Fraud detection can be formulated as either a binary classification problem or One class classification (OCC). In this study, we handled these techniques on an ATM transactions dataset collected from India. In binary classification, we investigated the effectiveness of various over-sampling techniques, such as the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and its variants, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), to achieve oversampling. Further, we employed various machine learning techniques viz., Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT), Multi-layer perceptron (MLP). GBT outperformed the rest of the models by achieving 0.963 AUC, and DT stands second with 0.958 AUC. DT is the winner if the complexity and interpretability aspects are considered. Among all the oversampling approaches, SMOTE and its variants were observed to perform better. In OCC, IForest attained 0.959 CR, and OCSVM secured second place with 0.947 CR. Further, we incorporated explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and causal inference (CI) in the fraud detection framework and studied it through various analyses.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2211.10595</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.10595
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2211_10595
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science - Learning
title Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Causal Inference based ATM Fraud Detection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T13%3A07%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explainable%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20and%20Causal%20Inference%20based%20ATM%20Fraud%20Detection&rft.au=Vivek,%20Yelleti&rft.date=2022-11-19&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2211.10595&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2211_10595%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true