Shadow prices and optimal cost in economic applications

Shadow prices are well understood and are widely used in economic applications. However, there are limits to where shadow prices can be applied assuming their natural interpretation and the fact that they reflect the first order optimality conditions (FOC). In this paper, we present a simple ad-hoc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Khabarov, Nikolay, Smirnov, Alexey, Obersteiner, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Khabarov, Nikolay
Smirnov, Alexey
Obersteiner, Michael
description Shadow prices are well understood and are widely used in economic applications. However, there are limits to where shadow prices can be applied assuming their natural interpretation and the fact that they reflect the first order optimality conditions (FOC). In this paper, we present a simple ad-hoc example demonstrating that marginal cost associated with exercising an optimal control may exceed the respective cost estimated from a ratio of shadow prices. Moreover, such cost estimation through shadow prices is arbitrary and depends on a particular (mathematically equivalent) formulation of the optimization problem. These facts render a ratio of shadow prices irrelevant to estimation of optimal marginal cost. The provided illustrative optimization problem links to a similar approach of calculating social cost of carbon (SCC) in the widely used dynamic integrated model of climate and the economy (DICE).
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2211.03591
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2211_03591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211_03591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a671-e87a3456f9cf8635e6aac8034e9d424247d0db0e12d5e465daf8693114ba53d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj7sOgjAYhbs4GPUBnOwLgC29UEZjvCUkDrqT37bEJkAJJV7eXkRzhrOcnHwfQktKYq6EIGvoXu4RJwmlMWEio1OUXu5g_BO3ndM2YGgM9m3vaqiw9qHHrsFW-8bXTmNo28pp6J1vwhxNSqiCXfx7hq773XV7jPLz4bTd5BHIlEZWpcC4kGWmSyWZsBJAK8K4zQxPhqSGmBuxNDHCcikMDLOMUcpvIJhRbIZWv9uRvBgoa-jexdegGA3YB07OQGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shadow prices and optimal cost in economic applications</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Khabarov, Nikolay ; Smirnov, Alexey ; Obersteiner, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Khabarov, Nikolay ; Smirnov, Alexey ; Obersteiner, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Shadow prices are well understood and are widely used in economic applications. However, there are limits to where shadow prices can be applied assuming their natural interpretation and the fact that they reflect the first order optimality conditions (FOC). In this paper, we present a simple ad-hoc example demonstrating that marginal cost associated with exercising an optimal control may exceed the respective cost estimated from a ratio of shadow prices. Moreover, such cost estimation through shadow prices is arbitrary and depends on a particular (mathematically equivalent) formulation of the optimization problem. These facts render a ratio of shadow prices irrelevant to estimation of optimal marginal cost. The provided illustrative optimization problem links to a similar approach of calculating social cost of carbon (SCC) in the widely used dynamic integrated model of climate and the economy (DICE).</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.03591</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Quantitative Finance - Economics</subject><creationdate>2022-11</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,778,883</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03591$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.03591$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khabarov, Nikolay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smirnov, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obersteiner, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Shadow prices and optimal cost in economic applications</title><description>Shadow prices are well understood and are widely used in economic applications. However, there are limits to where shadow prices can be applied assuming their natural interpretation and the fact that they reflect the first order optimality conditions (FOC). In this paper, we present a simple ad-hoc example demonstrating that marginal cost associated with exercising an optimal control may exceed the respective cost estimated from a ratio of shadow prices. Moreover, such cost estimation through shadow prices is arbitrary and depends on a particular (mathematically equivalent) formulation of the optimization problem. These facts render a ratio of shadow prices irrelevant to estimation of optimal marginal cost. The provided illustrative optimization problem links to a similar approach of calculating social cost of carbon (SCC) in the widely used dynamic integrated model of climate and the economy (DICE).</description><subject>Quantitative Finance - Economics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj7sOgjAYhbs4GPUBnOwLgC29UEZjvCUkDrqT37bEJkAJJV7eXkRzhrOcnHwfQktKYq6EIGvoXu4RJwmlMWEio1OUXu5g_BO3ndM2YGgM9m3vaqiw9qHHrsFW-8bXTmNo28pp6J1vwhxNSqiCXfx7hq773XV7jPLz4bTd5BHIlEZWpcC4kGWmSyWZsBJAK8K4zQxPhqSGmBuxNDHCcikMDLOMUcpvIJhRbIZWv9uRvBgoa-jexdegGA3YB07OQGA</recordid><startdate>20221107</startdate><enddate>20221107</enddate><creator>Khabarov, Nikolay</creator><creator>Smirnov, Alexey</creator><creator>Obersteiner, Michael</creator><scope>ADEOX</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221107</creationdate><title>Shadow prices and optimal cost in economic applications</title><author>Khabarov, Nikolay ; Smirnov, Alexey ; Obersteiner, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a671-e87a3456f9cf8635e6aac8034e9d424247d0db0e12d5e465daf8693114ba53d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Quantitative Finance - Economics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khabarov, Nikolay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smirnov, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obersteiner, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Economics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khabarov, Nikolay</au><au>Smirnov, Alexey</au><au>Obersteiner, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shadow prices and optimal cost in economic applications</atitle><date>2022-11-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Shadow prices are well understood and are widely used in economic applications. However, there are limits to where shadow prices can be applied assuming their natural interpretation and the fact that they reflect the first order optimality conditions (FOC). In this paper, we present a simple ad-hoc example demonstrating that marginal cost associated with exercising an optimal control may exceed the respective cost estimated from a ratio of shadow prices. Moreover, such cost estimation through shadow prices is arbitrary and depends on a particular (mathematically equivalent) formulation of the optimization problem. These facts render a ratio of shadow prices irrelevant to estimation of optimal marginal cost. The provided illustrative optimization problem links to a similar approach of calculating social cost of carbon (SCC) in the widely used dynamic integrated model of climate and the economy (DICE).</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2211.03591</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.03591
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2211_03591
source arXiv.org
subjects Quantitative Finance - Economics
title Shadow prices and optimal cost in economic applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A50%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shadow%20prices%20and%20optimal%20cost%20in%20economic%20applications&rft.au=Khabarov,%20Nikolay&rft.date=2022-11-07&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2211.03591&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2211_03591%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true