Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation
With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2022-06 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo Nannini, Luca Rieger, Alisa Scott, Kristen M Zhao, Xuan Patro, Gourab K Kasneci, Gjergji Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina |
description | With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an EU AI Act. This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them, focusing on (but not limited to) the Proposal. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. Then, we map these perspectives along three axes of interests: (i) Standardization vs. Localization, (ii) Utilitarianism vs. Egalitarianism, and (iii) Consequential vs. Deontological ethics which leads us to identify a pattern of common arguments and tensions between these axes. Positioning the discussion within the axes of interest and with a focus on reconciling the key tensions, we identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2207.01510 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2207_01510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2684781180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-e3c71a33504b46ac56c8fcd00d0a9599913984fa7cbc49382ecdc3f10143e8783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1Lw0AURQdBsNT-AFcOuE5985VM3JXSaqGgSNGVhOnkpU5JJ3EmKfrvja2ru7kc7rmE3DCYSq0U3Jvw7Y5TziGbAlMMLsiIC8ESLTm_IpMY9wDA04wrJUbkY2lc8BgjdZ7OdgHxgL6j7677pIs-NC0aT99M3WN8oDNPV77DULpoXVs7b8IPfcEQW7SdOyJtBsaKvuKur03nGn9NLitTR5z855hslovN_ClZPz-u5rN1YhSHBIXNmBFCgdzK1FiVWl3ZEqAEk6s8z5nItaxMZrdW5kJztKUVFQMmBepMizG5PWNP7kUb3GFYVvx9UJw-GBp350Ybmq_BpSv2TR_8sKngqZaZZkyD-AWELl7U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2684781180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo ; Nannini, Luca ; Rieger, Alisa ; Scott, Kristen M ; Zhao, Xuan ; Patro, Gourab K ; Kasneci, Gjergji ; Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo ; Nannini, Luca ; Rieger, Alisa ; Scott, Kristen M ; Zhao, Xuan ; Patro, Gourab K ; Kasneci, Gjergji ; Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an EU AI Act. This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them, focusing on (but not limited to) the Proposal. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. Then, we map these perspectives along three axes of interests: (i) Standardization vs. Localization, (ii) Utilitarianism vs. Egalitarianism, and (iii) Consequential vs. Deontological ethics which leads us to identify a pattern of common arguments and tensions between these axes. Positioning the discussion within the axes of interest and with a focus on reconciling the key tensions, we identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2207.01510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Computer Science - Computers and Society ; Digitization ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Philosophy ; Regulation ; Social problems</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-06</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.01510$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534158$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nannini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Alisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Kristen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patro, Gourab K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasneci, Gjergji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an EU AI Act. This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them, focusing on (but not limited to) the Proposal. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. Then, we map these perspectives along three axes of interests: (i) Standardization vs. Localization, (ii) Utilitarianism vs. Egalitarianism, and (iii) Consequential vs. Deontological ethics which leads us to identify a pattern of common arguments and tensions between these axes. Positioning the discussion within the axes of interest and with a focus on reconciling the key tensions, we identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science - Computers and Society</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1Lw0AURQdBsNT-AFcOuE5985VM3JXSaqGgSNGVhOnkpU5JJ3EmKfrvja2ru7kc7rmE3DCYSq0U3Jvw7Y5TziGbAlMMLsiIC8ESLTm_IpMY9wDA04wrJUbkY2lc8BgjdZ7OdgHxgL6j7677pIs-NC0aT99M3WN8oDNPV77DULpoXVs7b8IPfcEQW7SdOyJtBsaKvuKur03nGn9NLitTR5z855hslovN_ClZPz-u5rN1YhSHBIXNmBFCgdzK1FiVWl3ZEqAEk6s8z5nItaxMZrdW5kJztKUVFQMmBepMizG5PWNP7kUb3GFYVvx9UJw-GBp350Ybmq_BpSv2TR_8sKngqZaZZkyD-AWELl7U</recordid><startdate>20220608</startdate><enddate>20220608</enddate><creator>Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo</creator><creator>Nannini, Luca</creator><creator>Rieger, Alisa</creator><creator>Scott, Kristen M</creator><creator>Zhao, Xuan</creator><creator>Patro, Gourab K</creator><creator>Kasneci, Gjergji</creator><creator>Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220608</creationdate><title>Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation</title><author>Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo ; Nannini, Luca ; Rieger, Alisa ; Scott, Kristen M ; Zhao, Xuan ; Patro, Gourab K ; Kasneci, Gjergji ; Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-e3c71a33504b46ac56c8fcd00d0a9599913984fa7cbc49382ecdc3f10143e8783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science - Computers and Society</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nannini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Alisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Kristen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patro, Gourab K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasneci, Gjergji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo</au><au>Nannini, Luca</au><au>Rieger, Alisa</au><au>Scott, Kristen M</au><au>Zhao, Xuan</au><au>Patro, Gourab K</au><au>Kasneci, Gjergji</au><au>Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-06-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an EU AI Act. This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them, focusing on (but not limited to) the Proposal. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. Then, we map these perspectives along three axes of interests: (i) Standardization vs. Localization, (ii) Utilitarianism vs. Egalitarianism, and (iii) Consequential vs. Deontological ethics which leads us to identify a pattern of common arguments and tensions between these axes. Positioning the discussion within the axes of interest and with a focus on reconciling the key tensions, we identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2207.01510</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2022-06 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2207_01510 |
source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Computer Science - Computers and Society Digitization Interdisciplinary aspects Philosophy Regulation Social problems |
title | Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A07%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fairness%20in%20Agreement%20With%20European%20Values:%20An%20Interdisciplinary%20Perspective%20on%20AI%20Regulation&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Alejandra%20Bringas%20Colmenarejo&rft.date=2022-06-08&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2207.01510&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2684781180%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2684781180&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |