SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles

As shown by recent studies, machine intelligence-enabled systems are vulnerable to test cases resulting from either adversarial manipulation or natural distribution shifts. This has raised great concerns about deploying machine learning algorithms for real-world applications, especially in safety-cr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Chejian, Ding, Wenhao, Lyu, Weijie, Liu, Zuxin, Wang, Shuai, He, Yihan, Hu, Hanjiang, Zhao, Ding, Li, Bo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Xu, Chejian
Ding, Wenhao
Lyu, Weijie
Liu, Zuxin
Wang, Shuai
He, Yihan
Hu, Hanjiang
Zhao, Ding
Li, Bo
description As shown by recent studies, machine intelligence-enabled systems are vulnerable to test cases resulting from either adversarial manipulation or natural distribution shifts. This has raised great concerns about deploying machine learning algorithms for real-world applications, especially in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving (AD). On the other hand, traditional AD testing on naturalistic scenarios requires hundreds of millions of driving miles due to the high dimensionality and rareness of the safety-critical scenarios in the real world. As a result, several approaches for autonomous driving evaluation have been explored, which are usually, however, based on different simulation platforms, types of safety-critical scenarios, scenario generation algorithms, and driving route variations. Thus, despite a large amount of effort in autonomous driving testing, it is still challenging to compare and understand the effectiveness and efficiency of different testing scenario generation algorithms and testing mechanisms under similar conditions. In this paper, we aim to provide the first unified platform SafeBench to integrate different types of safety-critical testing scenarios, scenario generation algorithms, and other variations such as driving routes and environments. Meanwhile, we implement 4 deep reinforcement learning-based AD algorithms with 4 types of input (e.g., bird's-eye view, camera) to perform fair comparisons on SafeBench. We find our generated testing scenarios are indeed more challenging and observe the trade-off between the performance of AD agents under benign and safety-critical testing scenarios. We believe our unified platform SafeBench for large-scale and effective autonomous driving testing will motivate the development of new testing scenario generation and safe AD algorithms. SafeBench is available at https://safebench.github.io.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2206.09682
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2206_09682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2206_09682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-5e1507f25bfa9df55d79cbc6b70373d1bc912c8cb85876838a712fbd939d8eb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj7lOw0AYhLehQIEHoMq-gM0e2YvOROGQIgWJiNb69yIrbC_yEZG3JzE0M1OMRvMhdEdJudJCkHvof9KxZIzIkhip2TXavUMMj6Fzhwdc4Tm00H-l7hO_NTDG3Lf4LPhSG094c4RmgjHlDueIq2nMXW7zNOCPcEiuCcMNuorQDOH23xdo_7TZr1-K7e75dV1tC5CKFSJQQVRkwkYwPgrhlXHWSasIV9xT6wxlTjurhVZScw2Ksmi94cbrYCVfoOXf7ExUf_fp_PpUX8jqmYz_Ar0WST8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Xu, Chejian ; Ding, Wenhao ; Lyu, Weijie ; Liu, Zuxin ; Wang, Shuai ; He, Yihan ; Hu, Hanjiang ; Zhao, Ding ; Li, Bo</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Chejian ; Ding, Wenhao ; Lyu, Weijie ; Liu, Zuxin ; Wang, Shuai ; He, Yihan ; Hu, Hanjiang ; Zhao, Ding ; Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><description>As shown by recent studies, machine intelligence-enabled systems are vulnerable to test cases resulting from either adversarial manipulation or natural distribution shifts. This has raised great concerns about deploying machine learning algorithms for real-world applications, especially in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving (AD). On the other hand, traditional AD testing on naturalistic scenarios requires hundreds of millions of driving miles due to the high dimensionality and rareness of the safety-critical scenarios in the real world. As a result, several approaches for autonomous driving evaluation have been explored, which are usually, however, based on different simulation platforms, types of safety-critical scenarios, scenario generation algorithms, and driving route variations. Thus, despite a large amount of effort in autonomous driving testing, it is still challenging to compare and understand the effectiveness and efficiency of different testing scenario generation algorithms and testing mechanisms under similar conditions. In this paper, we aim to provide the first unified platform SafeBench to integrate different types of safety-critical testing scenarios, scenario generation algorithms, and other variations such as driving routes and environments. Meanwhile, we implement 4 deep reinforcement learning-based AD algorithms with 4 types of input (e.g., bird's-eye view, camera) to perform fair comparisons on SafeBench. We find our generated testing scenarios are indeed more challenging and observe the trade-off between the performance of AD agents under benign and safety-critical testing scenarios. We believe our unified platform SafeBench for large-scale and effective autonomous driving testing will motivate the development of new testing scenario generation and safe AD algorithms. SafeBench is available at https://safebench.github.io.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.09682</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Robotics</subject><creationdate>2022-06</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,777,882</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2206.09682$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.09682$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Chejian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Wenhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Weijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zuxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hanjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><title>SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles</title><description>As shown by recent studies, machine intelligence-enabled systems are vulnerable to test cases resulting from either adversarial manipulation or natural distribution shifts. This has raised great concerns about deploying machine learning algorithms for real-world applications, especially in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving (AD). On the other hand, traditional AD testing on naturalistic scenarios requires hundreds of millions of driving miles due to the high dimensionality and rareness of the safety-critical scenarios in the real world. As a result, several approaches for autonomous driving evaluation have been explored, which are usually, however, based on different simulation platforms, types of safety-critical scenarios, scenario generation algorithms, and driving route variations. Thus, despite a large amount of effort in autonomous driving testing, it is still challenging to compare and understand the effectiveness and efficiency of different testing scenario generation algorithms and testing mechanisms under similar conditions. In this paper, we aim to provide the first unified platform SafeBench to integrate different types of safety-critical testing scenarios, scenario generation algorithms, and other variations such as driving routes and environments. Meanwhile, we implement 4 deep reinforcement learning-based AD algorithms with 4 types of input (e.g., bird's-eye view, camera) to perform fair comparisons on SafeBench. We find our generated testing scenarios are indeed more challenging and observe the trade-off between the performance of AD agents under benign and safety-critical testing scenarios. We believe our unified platform SafeBench for large-scale and effective autonomous driving testing will motivate the development of new testing scenario generation and safe AD algorithms. SafeBench is available at https://safebench.github.io.</description><subject>Computer Science - Robotics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj7lOw0AYhLehQIEHoMq-gM0e2YvOROGQIgWJiNb69yIrbC_yEZG3JzE0M1OMRvMhdEdJudJCkHvof9KxZIzIkhip2TXavUMMj6Fzhwdc4Tm00H-l7hO_NTDG3Lf4LPhSG094c4RmgjHlDueIq2nMXW7zNOCPcEiuCcMNuorQDOH23xdo_7TZr1-K7e75dV1tC5CKFSJQQVRkwkYwPgrhlXHWSasIV9xT6wxlTjurhVZScw2Ksmi94cbrYCVfoOXf7ExUf_fp_PpUX8jqmYz_Ar0WST8</recordid><startdate>20220620</startdate><enddate>20220620</enddate><creator>Xu, Chejian</creator><creator>Ding, Wenhao</creator><creator>Lyu, Weijie</creator><creator>Liu, Zuxin</creator><creator>Wang, Shuai</creator><creator>He, Yihan</creator><creator>Hu, Hanjiang</creator><creator>Zhao, Ding</creator><creator>Li, Bo</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220620</creationdate><title>SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles</title><author>Xu, Chejian ; Ding, Wenhao ; Lyu, Weijie ; Liu, Zuxin ; Wang, Shuai ; He, Yihan ; Hu, Hanjiang ; Zhao, Ding ; Li, Bo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-5e1507f25bfa9df55d79cbc6b70373d1bc912c8cb85876838a712fbd939d8eb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Robotics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Chejian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Wenhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Weijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zuxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hanjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Chejian</au><au>Ding, Wenhao</au><au>Lyu, Weijie</au><au>Liu, Zuxin</au><au>Wang, Shuai</au><au>He, Yihan</au><au>Hu, Hanjiang</au><au>Zhao, Ding</au><au>Li, Bo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles</atitle><date>2022-06-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>As shown by recent studies, machine intelligence-enabled systems are vulnerable to test cases resulting from either adversarial manipulation or natural distribution shifts. This has raised great concerns about deploying machine learning algorithms for real-world applications, especially in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving (AD). On the other hand, traditional AD testing on naturalistic scenarios requires hundreds of millions of driving miles due to the high dimensionality and rareness of the safety-critical scenarios in the real world. As a result, several approaches for autonomous driving evaluation have been explored, which are usually, however, based on different simulation platforms, types of safety-critical scenarios, scenario generation algorithms, and driving route variations. Thus, despite a large amount of effort in autonomous driving testing, it is still challenging to compare and understand the effectiveness and efficiency of different testing scenario generation algorithms and testing mechanisms under similar conditions. In this paper, we aim to provide the first unified platform SafeBench to integrate different types of safety-critical testing scenarios, scenario generation algorithms, and other variations such as driving routes and environments. Meanwhile, we implement 4 deep reinforcement learning-based AD algorithms with 4 types of input (e.g., bird's-eye view, camera) to perform fair comparisons on SafeBench. We find our generated testing scenarios are indeed more challenging and observe the trade-off between the performance of AD agents under benign and safety-critical testing scenarios. We believe our unified platform SafeBench for large-scale and effective autonomous driving testing will motivate the development of new testing scenario generation and safe AD algorithms. SafeBench is available at https://safebench.github.io.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2206.09682</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.09682
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2206_09682
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Robotics
title SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A59%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SafeBench:%20A%20Benchmarking%20Platform%20for%20Safety%20Evaluation%20of%20Autonomous%20Vehicles&rft.au=Xu,%20Chejian&rft.date=2022-06-20&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2206.09682&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2206_09682%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true