Eclipse timing variations in post-common envelope binaries: Are they a reliable indicator of circumbinary companions?

Post-common envelope binary systems evolve when matter is transferred from the primary star at a rate that cannot be accommodated by its secondary companion. A common envelope forms which is subsequently ejected resulting in a system with a binary period frequently between 2 and 3 hours. Where circu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2022-06
Hauptverfasser: Pulley, D, Sharp, I D, Mallett, J, S von Harrach
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Pulley, D
Sharp, I D
Mallett, J
S von Harrach
description Post-common envelope binary systems evolve when matter is transferred from the primary star at a rate that cannot be accommodated by its secondary companion. A common envelope forms which is subsequently ejected resulting in a system with a binary period frequently between 2 and 3 hours. Where circumbinary companions are predicted, it remains unclear whether they form before or after the common envelope ejection. From observations of eclipse time variations (ETVs), exoplanet databases e.g. NASA Exoplanet Archive, list typically a dozen systems with confirmed circumbinary planets. Here we examine seven of these systems, discuss other possible causes and consider whether, for these dynamic systems, the ETV methodology is a reliable indicator of planetary companions. The systems selected were those where we could determine precise eclipse timings, free from significant extraneous effects such as pulsations, and present 163 new times of minima permitting us to test existing models. Over thirty circumbinary models have been proposed for these seven systems and note all, other than the latest model for NY Vir which remains to be fully tested, fail within a year to accurately predict eclipse times. In examining alternative mechanisms we find that magnetic effects could contribute significantly in two of the seven systems studied. We conclude that the structure of these dynamic systems, with the extreme temperature differences and small binary separations, are not fully understood and that many factors may contribute to the observed ETVs.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2206.06919
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2206_06919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2676705360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-4a52350ca599ecbff8836713d52107e7f590faa66f7a4166e1b761547ea60a2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMgWGp_gCsDrqfmMUlm3Egp9QEFN90Pd9JEU2aSMZkp9t-bVjf3bs53OHwI3VGyLCshyCPEH3dcMkbkksia1ldoxjinRVUydoMWKR0IIUwqJgSfoWmjOzckg0fXO_-JjxAdjC74hJ3HQ0hjoUPfB4-NP5ouDAa3zueQSU94FTP3ZU4YcDSdg7Yzmdo7DWOIOFisXdRTfwFOOPcM4M_Vz7fo2kKXzOL_z9HuZbNbvxXbj9f39WpbgGCkKPPlgmgQdW10a21Vcako3wtGiTLKippYACmtgpJKaWirJBWlMiAJsD2fo_u_2ouTZoiuz0Oas5vm4iYnHv4SQwzfk0ljcwhT9HlTkxVJRQSXhP8CNZdoiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2676705360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eclipse timing variations in post-common envelope binaries: Are they a reliable indicator of circumbinary companions?</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Pulley, D ; Sharp, I D ; Mallett, J ; S von Harrach</creator><creatorcontrib>Pulley, D ; Sharp, I D ; Mallett, J ; S von Harrach</creatorcontrib><description>Post-common envelope binary systems evolve when matter is transferred from the primary star at a rate that cannot be accommodated by its secondary companion. A common envelope forms which is subsequently ejected resulting in a system with a binary period frequently between 2 and 3 hours. Where circumbinary companions are predicted, it remains unclear whether they form before or after the common envelope ejection. From observations of eclipse time variations (ETVs), exoplanet databases e.g. NASA Exoplanet Archive, list typically a dozen systems with confirmed circumbinary planets. Here we examine seven of these systems, discuss other possible causes and consider whether, for these dynamic systems, the ETV methodology is a reliable indicator of planetary companions. The systems selected were those where we could determine precise eclipse timings, free from significant extraneous effects such as pulsations, and present 163 new times of minima permitting us to test existing models. Over thirty circumbinary models have been proposed for these seven systems and note all, other than the latest model for NY Vir which remains to be fully tested, fail within a year to accurately predict eclipse times. In examining alternative mechanisms we find that magnetic effects could contribute significantly in two of the seven systems studied. We conclude that the structure of these dynamic systems, with the extreme temperature differences and small binary separations, are not fully understood and that many factors may contribute to the observed ETVs.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.06919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Binary stars ; Companion stars ; Dynamical systems ; Extrasolar planets ; Magnetic effects ; Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics ; Physics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics ; Stellar system evolution</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-06</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.06919$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1676$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pulley, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, I D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallett, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S von Harrach</creatorcontrib><title>Eclipse timing variations in post-common envelope binaries: Are they a reliable indicator of circumbinary companions?</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Post-common envelope binary systems evolve when matter is transferred from the primary star at a rate that cannot be accommodated by its secondary companion. A common envelope forms which is subsequently ejected resulting in a system with a binary period frequently between 2 and 3 hours. Where circumbinary companions are predicted, it remains unclear whether they form before or after the common envelope ejection. From observations of eclipse time variations (ETVs), exoplanet databases e.g. NASA Exoplanet Archive, list typically a dozen systems with confirmed circumbinary planets. Here we examine seven of these systems, discuss other possible causes and consider whether, for these dynamic systems, the ETV methodology is a reliable indicator of planetary companions. The systems selected were those where we could determine precise eclipse timings, free from significant extraneous effects such as pulsations, and present 163 new times of minima permitting us to test existing models. Over thirty circumbinary models have been proposed for these seven systems and note all, other than the latest model for NY Vir which remains to be fully tested, fail within a year to accurately predict eclipse times. In examining alternative mechanisms we find that magnetic effects could contribute significantly in two of the seven systems studied. We conclude that the structure of these dynamic systems, with the extreme temperature differences and small binary separations, are not fully understood and that many factors may contribute to the observed ETVs.</description><subject>Binary stars</subject><subject>Companion stars</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Extrasolar planets</subject><subject>Magnetic effects</subject><subject>Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics</subject><subject>Physics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics</subject><subject>Stellar system evolution</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMgWGp_gCsDrqfmMUlm3Egp9QEFN90Pd9JEU2aSMZkp9t-bVjf3bs53OHwI3VGyLCshyCPEH3dcMkbkksia1ldoxjinRVUydoMWKR0IIUwqJgSfoWmjOzckg0fXO_-JjxAdjC74hJ3HQ0hjoUPfB4-NP5ouDAa3zueQSU94FTP3ZU4YcDSdg7Yzmdo7DWOIOFisXdRTfwFOOPcM4M_Vz7fo2kKXzOL_z9HuZbNbvxXbj9f39WpbgGCkKPPlgmgQdW10a21Vcako3wtGiTLKippYACmtgpJKaWirJBWlMiAJsD2fo_u_2ouTZoiuz0Oas5vm4iYnHv4SQwzfk0ljcwhT9HlTkxVJRQSXhP8CNZdoiw</recordid><startdate>20220614</startdate><enddate>20220614</enddate><creator>Pulley, D</creator><creator>Sharp, I D</creator><creator>Mallett, J</creator><creator>S von Harrach</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220614</creationdate><title>Eclipse timing variations in post-common envelope binaries: Are they a reliable indicator of circumbinary companions?</title><author>Pulley, D ; Sharp, I D ; Mallett, J ; S von Harrach</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-4a52350ca599ecbff8836713d52107e7f590faa66f7a4166e1b761547ea60a2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Binary stars</topic><topic>Companion stars</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Extrasolar planets</topic><topic>Magnetic effects</topic><topic>Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics</topic><topic>Physics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics</topic><topic>Stellar system evolution</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pulley, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, I D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallett, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S von Harrach</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pulley, D</au><au>Sharp, I D</au><au>Mallett, J</au><au>S von Harrach</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eclipse timing variations in post-common envelope binaries: Are they a reliable indicator of circumbinary companions?</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-06-14</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Post-common envelope binary systems evolve when matter is transferred from the primary star at a rate that cannot be accommodated by its secondary companion. A common envelope forms which is subsequently ejected resulting in a system with a binary period frequently between 2 and 3 hours. Where circumbinary companions are predicted, it remains unclear whether they form before or after the common envelope ejection. From observations of eclipse time variations (ETVs), exoplanet databases e.g. NASA Exoplanet Archive, list typically a dozen systems with confirmed circumbinary planets. Here we examine seven of these systems, discuss other possible causes and consider whether, for these dynamic systems, the ETV methodology is a reliable indicator of planetary companions. The systems selected were those where we could determine precise eclipse timings, free from significant extraneous effects such as pulsations, and present 163 new times of minima permitting us to test existing models. Over thirty circumbinary models have been proposed for these seven systems and note all, other than the latest model for NY Vir which remains to be fully tested, fail within a year to accurately predict eclipse times. In examining alternative mechanisms we find that magnetic effects could contribute significantly in two of the seven systems studied. We conclude that the structure of these dynamic systems, with the extreme temperature differences and small binary separations, are not fully understood and that many factors may contribute to the observed ETVs.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2206.06919</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2022-06
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2206_06919
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Binary stars
Companion stars
Dynamical systems
Extrasolar planets
Magnetic effects
Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Physics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Stellar system evolution
title Eclipse timing variations in post-common envelope binaries: Are they a reliable indicator of circumbinary companions?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A29%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eclipse%20timing%20variations%20in%20post-common%20envelope%20binaries:%20Are%20they%20a%20reliable%20indicator%20of%20circumbinary%20companions?&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Pulley,%20D&rft.date=2022-06-14&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2206.06919&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2676705360%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2676705360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true