Determinization of One-Counter Nets

One-Counter Nets (OCNs) are finite-state automata equipped with a counter that is not allowed to become negative, but does not have zero tests. Their simplicity and close connection to various other models (e.g., VASS, Counter Machines and Pushdown Automata) make them an attractive model for studyin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Almagor, Shaull, Yeshurun, Asaf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Almagor, Shaull
Yeshurun, Asaf
description One-Counter Nets (OCNs) are finite-state automata equipped with a counter that is not allowed to become negative, but does not have zero tests. Their simplicity and close connection to various other models (e.g., VASS, Counter Machines and Pushdown Automata) make them an attractive model for studying the border of decidability for the classical decision problems. The deterministic fragment of OCNs (DOCNs) typically admits more tractable decision problems, and while these problems and the expressive power of DOCNs have been studied, the determinization problem, namely deciding whether an OCN admits an equivalent DOCN, has not received attention. We introduce four notions of OCN determinizability, which arise naturally due to intricacies in the model, and specifically, the interpretation of the initial counter value. We show that in general, determinizability is undecidable under most notions, but over a singleton alphabet (i.e., 1 dimensional VASS) one definition becomes decidable, and the rest become trivial, in that there is always an equivalent DOCN.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2112.13716
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2112_13716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2112_13716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a676-7bfcbe3b4825094f0e04d3db50f134fe501cd7a4bbdb05e53d8eb561158744d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzjsLwjAUhuEsDqL-ACcLzq05TU5TR6lXKLq4l8ScQMC20lZRf73X6Rte-HgYGwOPZIrIZ7q5-1sUA8QRCAVJn02X1FFT-so_defrKqhdcKgozOpr9Q7Bnrp2yHpOn1sa_XfAjuvVMduG-WGzyxZ5qBOVhMq4kyFhZBojn0vHiUsrrEHuQEhHyOFklZbGWMORUNiUDCYAmCopbSwGbPK7_SqLS-NL3TyKj7b4asULh6A5HQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinization of One-Counter Nets</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Almagor, Shaull ; Yeshurun, Asaf</creator><creatorcontrib>Almagor, Shaull ; Yeshurun, Asaf</creatorcontrib><description>One-Counter Nets (OCNs) are finite-state automata equipped with a counter that is not allowed to become negative, but does not have zero tests. Their simplicity and close connection to various other models (e.g., VASS, Counter Machines and Pushdown Automata) make them an attractive model for studying the border of decidability for the classical decision problems. The deterministic fragment of OCNs (DOCNs) typically admits more tractable decision problems, and while these problems and the expressive power of DOCNs have been studied, the determinization problem, namely deciding whether an OCN admits an equivalent DOCN, has not received attention. We introduce four notions of OCN determinizability, which arise naturally due to intricacies in the model, and specifically, the interpretation of the initial counter value. We show that in general, determinizability is undecidable under most notions, but over a singleton alphabet (i.e., 1 dimensional VASS) one definition becomes decidable, and the rest become trivial, in that there is always an equivalent DOCN.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.13716</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory</subject><creationdate>2021-12</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13716$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.13716$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Almagor, Shaull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeshurun, Asaf</creatorcontrib><title>Determinization of One-Counter Nets</title><description>One-Counter Nets (OCNs) are finite-state automata equipped with a counter that is not allowed to become negative, but does not have zero tests. Their simplicity and close connection to various other models (e.g., VASS, Counter Machines and Pushdown Automata) make them an attractive model for studying the border of decidability for the classical decision problems. The deterministic fragment of OCNs (DOCNs) typically admits more tractable decision problems, and while these problems and the expressive power of DOCNs have been studied, the determinization problem, namely deciding whether an OCN admits an equivalent DOCN, has not received attention. We introduce four notions of OCN determinizability, which arise naturally due to intricacies in the model, and specifically, the interpretation of the initial counter value. We show that in general, determinizability is undecidable under most notions, but over a singleton alphabet (i.e., 1 dimensional VASS) one definition becomes decidable, and the rest become trivial, in that there is always an equivalent DOCN.</description><subject>Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzjsLwjAUhuEsDqL-ACcLzq05TU5TR6lXKLq4l8ScQMC20lZRf73X6Rte-HgYGwOPZIrIZ7q5-1sUA8QRCAVJn02X1FFT-so_defrKqhdcKgozOpr9Q7Bnrp2yHpOn1sa_XfAjuvVMduG-WGzyxZ5qBOVhMq4kyFhZBojn0vHiUsrrEHuQEhHyOFklZbGWMORUNiUDCYAmCopbSwGbPK7_SqLS-NL3TyKj7b4asULh6A5HQ</recordid><startdate>20211227</startdate><enddate>20211227</enddate><creator>Almagor, Shaull</creator><creator>Yeshurun, Asaf</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211227</creationdate><title>Determinization of One-Counter Nets</title><author>Almagor, Shaull ; Yeshurun, Asaf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a676-7bfcbe3b4825094f0e04d3db50f134fe501cd7a4bbdb05e53d8eb561158744d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Almagor, Shaull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeshurun, Asaf</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Almagor, Shaull</au><au>Yeshurun, Asaf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinization of One-Counter Nets</atitle><date>2021-12-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>One-Counter Nets (OCNs) are finite-state automata equipped with a counter that is not allowed to become negative, but does not have zero tests. Their simplicity and close connection to various other models (e.g., VASS, Counter Machines and Pushdown Automata) make them an attractive model for studying the border of decidability for the classical decision problems. The deterministic fragment of OCNs (DOCNs) typically admits more tractable decision problems, and while these problems and the expressive power of DOCNs have been studied, the determinization problem, namely deciding whether an OCN admits an equivalent DOCN, has not received attention. We introduce four notions of OCN determinizability, which arise naturally due to intricacies in the model, and specifically, the interpretation of the initial counter value. We show that in general, determinizability is undecidable under most notions, but over a singleton alphabet (i.e., 1 dimensional VASS) one definition becomes decidable, and the rest become trivial, in that there is always an equivalent DOCN.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2112.13716</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.13716
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2112_13716
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory
title Determinization of One-Counter Nets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A37%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinization%20of%20One-Counter%20Nets&rft.au=Almagor,%20Shaull&rft.date=2021-12-27&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2112.13716&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2112_13716%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true