Machine Learning Guided 3D Image Recognition for Carbonate Pore and Mineral Volumes Determination

Automated image processing algorithms can improve the quality, efficiency, and consistency of classifying the morphology of heterogeneous carbonate rock and can deal with a massive amount of data and images seamlessly. Geoscientists face difficulties in setting the direction of the optimum method fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Alfarisi, Omar, Raza, Aikifa, Zhang, Hongtao, Ozzane, Djamel, Sassi, Mohamed, Zhang, Tiejun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Alfarisi, Omar
Raza, Aikifa
Zhang, Hongtao
Ozzane, Djamel
Sassi, Mohamed
Zhang, Tiejun
description Automated image processing algorithms can improve the quality, efficiency, and consistency of classifying the morphology of heterogeneous carbonate rock and can deal with a massive amount of data and images seamlessly. Geoscientists face difficulties in setting the direction of the optimum method for determining petrophysical properties from rock images, Micro-Computed Tomography (uCT), or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Most of the successful work is from the homogeneous rocks focusing on 2D images with less focus on 3D and requiring numerical simulation. Currently, image analysis methods converge to three approaches: image processing, artificial intelligence, and combined image processing with artificial intelligence. In this work, we propose two methods to determine the porosity from 3D uCT and MRI images: an image processing method with Image Resolution Optimized Gaussian Algorithm (IROGA); advanced image recognition method enabled by Machine Learning Difference of Gaussian Random Forest (MLDGRF). We have built reference 3D micro models and collected images for calibration of IROGA and MLDGRF methods. To evaluate the predictive capability of these calibrated approaches, we ran them on 3D uCT and MRI images of natural heterogeneous carbonate rock. We measured the porosity and lithology of the carbonate rock using three and two industry-standard ways, respectively, as reference values. Notably, IROGA and MLDGRF have produced porosity results with an accuracy of 96.2% and 97.1% on the training set and 91.7% and 94.4% on blind test validation, respectively, in comparison with the three experimental measurements. We measured limestone and pyrite reference values using two methods, X-ray powder diffraction, and grain density measurements. MLDGRF has produced lithology (limestone and Pyrite) volumes with 97.7% accuracy.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2111.04612
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2111_04612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2111_04612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-4dcb9f6f7c17f39f6a4b46f6b746947aad05c9a98e122176260c01d2791184ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8FOwzAQRH3hgAofwIn9gQTbcezkiFIolVqBUMU12jjrYCmxkZsi-HtC4TRzmHnSY-xG8FxVZcnvMH35z1wKIXKutJCXDPdo330g2BGm4MMAm5PvqYdiDdsJB4JXsnEIfvYxgIsJGkxdDDgTvMREgKGH_QJIOMJbHE8THWFNM6XJL6PldMUuHI5Huv7PFTs8Phyap2z3vNk297sMtZGZ6m1XO-2MFcYVS0PVKe10Z5SulUHseWlrrCsSUgqjpeaWi16aWohKYVes2O0f9uzYfiQ_Yfpuf13bs2vxA5HCTq8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine Learning Guided 3D Image Recognition for Carbonate Pore and Mineral Volumes Determination</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Alfarisi, Omar ; Raza, Aikifa ; Zhang, Hongtao ; Ozzane, Djamel ; Sassi, Mohamed ; Zhang, Tiejun</creator><creatorcontrib>Alfarisi, Omar ; Raza, Aikifa ; Zhang, Hongtao ; Ozzane, Djamel ; Sassi, Mohamed ; Zhang, Tiejun</creatorcontrib><description>Automated image processing algorithms can improve the quality, efficiency, and consistency of classifying the morphology of heterogeneous carbonate rock and can deal with a massive amount of data and images seamlessly. Geoscientists face difficulties in setting the direction of the optimum method for determining petrophysical properties from rock images, Micro-Computed Tomography (uCT), or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Most of the successful work is from the homogeneous rocks focusing on 2D images with less focus on 3D and requiring numerical simulation. Currently, image analysis methods converge to three approaches: image processing, artificial intelligence, and combined image processing with artificial intelligence. In this work, we propose two methods to determine the porosity from 3D uCT and MRI images: an image processing method with Image Resolution Optimized Gaussian Algorithm (IROGA); advanced image recognition method enabled by Machine Learning Difference of Gaussian Random Forest (MLDGRF). We have built reference 3D micro models and collected images for calibration of IROGA and MLDGRF methods. To evaluate the predictive capability of these calibrated approaches, we ran them on 3D uCT and MRI images of natural heterogeneous carbonate rock. We measured the porosity and lithology of the carbonate rock using three and two industry-standard ways, respectively, as reference values. Notably, IROGA and MLDGRF have produced porosity results with an accuracy of 96.2% and 97.1% on the training set and 91.7% and 94.4% on blind test validation, respectively, in comparison with the three experimental measurements. We measured limestone and pyrite reference values using two methods, X-ray powder diffraction, and grain density measurements. MLDGRF has produced lithology (limestone and Pyrite) volumes with 97.7% accuracy.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.04612</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ; Physics - Geophysics</subject><creationdate>2021-11</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04612$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.04612$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alfarisi, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raza, Aikifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozzane, Djamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sassi, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tiejun</creatorcontrib><title>Machine Learning Guided 3D Image Recognition for Carbonate Pore and Mineral Volumes Determination</title><description>Automated image processing algorithms can improve the quality, efficiency, and consistency of classifying the morphology of heterogeneous carbonate rock and can deal with a massive amount of data and images seamlessly. Geoscientists face difficulties in setting the direction of the optimum method for determining petrophysical properties from rock images, Micro-Computed Tomography (uCT), or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Most of the successful work is from the homogeneous rocks focusing on 2D images with less focus on 3D and requiring numerical simulation. Currently, image analysis methods converge to three approaches: image processing, artificial intelligence, and combined image processing with artificial intelligence. In this work, we propose two methods to determine the porosity from 3D uCT and MRI images: an image processing method with Image Resolution Optimized Gaussian Algorithm (IROGA); advanced image recognition method enabled by Machine Learning Difference of Gaussian Random Forest (MLDGRF). We have built reference 3D micro models and collected images for calibration of IROGA and MLDGRF methods. To evaluate the predictive capability of these calibrated approaches, we ran them on 3D uCT and MRI images of natural heterogeneous carbonate rock. We measured the porosity and lithology of the carbonate rock using three and two industry-standard ways, respectively, as reference values. Notably, IROGA and MLDGRF have produced porosity results with an accuracy of 96.2% and 97.1% on the training set and 91.7% and 94.4% on blind test validation, respectively, in comparison with the three experimental measurements. We measured limestone and pyrite reference values using two methods, X-ray powder diffraction, and grain density measurements. MLDGRF has produced lithology (limestone and Pyrite) volumes with 97.7% accuracy.</description><subject>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</subject><subject>Physics - Geophysics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8FOwzAQRH3hgAofwIn9gQTbcezkiFIolVqBUMU12jjrYCmxkZsi-HtC4TRzmHnSY-xG8FxVZcnvMH35z1wKIXKutJCXDPdo330g2BGm4MMAm5PvqYdiDdsJB4JXsnEIfvYxgIsJGkxdDDgTvMREgKGH_QJIOMJbHE8THWFNM6XJL6PldMUuHI5Huv7PFTs8Phyap2z3vNk297sMtZGZ6m1XO-2MFcYVS0PVKe10Z5SulUHseWlrrCsSUgqjpeaWi16aWohKYVes2O0f9uzYfiQ_Yfpuf13bs2vxA5HCTq8</recordid><startdate>20211108</startdate><enddate>20211108</enddate><creator>Alfarisi, Omar</creator><creator>Raza, Aikifa</creator><creator>Zhang, Hongtao</creator><creator>Ozzane, Djamel</creator><creator>Sassi, Mohamed</creator><creator>Zhang, Tiejun</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211108</creationdate><title>Machine Learning Guided 3D Image Recognition for Carbonate Pore and Mineral Volumes Determination</title><author>Alfarisi, Omar ; Raza, Aikifa ; Zhang, Hongtao ; Ozzane, Djamel ; Sassi, Mohamed ; Zhang, Tiejun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-4dcb9f6f7c17f39f6a4b46f6b746947aad05c9a98e122176260c01d2791184ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</topic><topic>Physics - Geophysics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alfarisi, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raza, Aikifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozzane, Djamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sassi, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tiejun</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alfarisi, Omar</au><au>Raza, Aikifa</au><au>Zhang, Hongtao</au><au>Ozzane, Djamel</au><au>Sassi, Mohamed</au><au>Zhang, Tiejun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine Learning Guided 3D Image Recognition for Carbonate Pore and Mineral Volumes Determination</atitle><date>2021-11-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Automated image processing algorithms can improve the quality, efficiency, and consistency of classifying the morphology of heterogeneous carbonate rock and can deal with a massive amount of data and images seamlessly. Geoscientists face difficulties in setting the direction of the optimum method for determining petrophysical properties from rock images, Micro-Computed Tomography (uCT), or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Most of the successful work is from the homogeneous rocks focusing on 2D images with less focus on 3D and requiring numerical simulation. Currently, image analysis methods converge to three approaches: image processing, artificial intelligence, and combined image processing with artificial intelligence. In this work, we propose two methods to determine the porosity from 3D uCT and MRI images: an image processing method with Image Resolution Optimized Gaussian Algorithm (IROGA); advanced image recognition method enabled by Machine Learning Difference of Gaussian Random Forest (MLDGRF). We have built reference 3D micro models and collected images for calibration of IROGA and MLDGRF methods. To evaluate the predictive capability of these calibrated approaches, we ran them on 3D uCT and MRI images of natural heterogeneous carbonate rock. We measured the porosity and lithology of the carbonate rock using three and two industry-standard ways, respectively, as reference values. Notably, IROGA and MLDGRF have produced porosity results with an accuracy of 96.2% and 97.1% on the training set and 91.7% and 94.4% on blind test validation, respectively, in comparison with the three experimental measurements. We measured limestone and pyrite reference values using two methods, X-ray powder diffraction, and grain density measurements. MLDGRF has produced lithology (limestone and Pyrite) volumes with 97.7% accuracy.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2111.04612</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.04612
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2111_04612
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Physics - Geophysics
title Machine Learning Guided 3D Image Recognition for Carbonate Pore and Mineral Volumes Determination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A53%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20Learning%20Guided%203D%20Image%20Recognition%20for%20Carbonate%20Pore%20and%20Mineral%20Volumes%20Determination&rft.au=Alfarisi,%20Omar&rft.date=2021-11-08&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2111.04612&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2111_04612%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true