Positivity and renormalization of parton densities

There have been recent debates about whether \(\overline{\text{MS}}\) parton densities exactly obey positivity bounds (including the Soffer bound), and whether the bounds should be applied as a constraint on global fits to parton densities and on nonperturbative calculations. A recent paper (JHEP \(...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2022-04
Hauptverfasser: Collins, John, Rogers, Ted C, Sato, Nobuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Collins, John
Rogers, Ted C
Sato, Nobuo
description There have been recent debates about whether \(\overline{\text{MS}}\) parton densities exactly obey positivity bounds (including the Soffer bound), and whether the bounds should be applied as a constraint on global fits to parton densities and on nonperturbative calculations. A recent paper (JHEP \({\bf \text{11}}\) (2020) 129) appears to provide a proof of positivity in contradiction with earlier work by other authors. We examine their derivation and find that its primary failure is in the apparently uncontroversial statement that bare pdfs are always positive. We show that under the conditions used in the derivation, that statement fails. We provide some elementary calculations in a model QFT that show how this situation can generically arise in reality. In addition, we observe that the methods used in the derivation are in common with much, but not all, other work where factorization is derived. Our examination pinpoints considerable difficulties with these methods that render them either wrong or highly problematic. The issue of positivity highlights that these methods can lead to wrong results of phenomenological importance. From our analysis we identify the restricted situations in which positivity can be violated.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2111.01170
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2111_01170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2592753321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-d0159733089fd1db06247b78acd831a9dc5603139a777d7ba642c684c6471d113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tqwzAUREWh0JDmA7qqoWu7uvfq5WUJfUGgXWRvZMsGhcRyJSc0_fo6j9XM4jDMYewBeCGMlPzZxl9_KBAACg6g-Q2bIRHkRiDesUVKG845Ko1S0ozhd0h-9Ac_HjPbuyy2fYg7u_V_dvShz0KXDTaOU3NtfyLbdM9uO7tN7eKac7Z-e10vP_LV1_vn8mWVW4mQOw6y1ETclJ0DV3OFQtfa2MYZAlu6RipOQKXVWjtdWyWwUUY0SmhwADRnj5fZs1A1RL-z8VidxKqz2EQ8XYghhp99m8ZqE_axnz5VKEvUkgiB_gGzCk8o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2592753321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positivity and renormalization of parton densities</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Collins, John ; Rogers, Ted C ; Sato, Nobuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, John ; Rogers, Ted C ; Sato, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><description>There have been recent debates about whether \(\overline{\text{MS}}\) parton densities exactly obey positivity bounds (including the Soffer bound), and whether the bounds should be applied as a constraint on global fits to parton densities and on nonperturbative calculations. A recent paper (JHEP \({\bf \text{11}}\) (2020) 129) appears to provide a proof of positivity in contradiction with earlier work by other authors. We examine their derivation and find that its primary failure is in the apparently uncontroversial statement that bare pdfs are always positive. We show that under the conditions used in the derivation, that statement fails. We provide some elementary calculations in a model QFT that show how this situation can generically arise in reality. In addition, we observe that the methods used in the derivation are in common with much, but not all, other work where factorization is derived. Our examination pinpoints considerable difficulties with these methods that render them either wrong or highly problematic. The issue of positivity highlights that these methods can lead to wrong results of phenomenological importance. From our analysis we identify the restricted situations in which positivity can be violated.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.01170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Derivation ; Partons ; Physics - High Energy Physics - Experiment ; Physics - High Energy Physics - Phenomenology ; Physics - Nuclear Theory</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-04</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.076010$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.01170$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Ted C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><title>Positivity and renormalization of parton densities</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>There have been recent debates about whether \(\overline{\text{MS}}\) parton densities exactly obey positivity bounds (including the Soffer bound), and whether the bounds should be applied as a constraint on global fits to parton densities and on nonperturbative calculations. A recent paper (JHEP \({\bf \text{11}}\) (2020) 129) appears to provide a proof of positivity in contradiction with earlier work by other authors. We examine their derivation and find that its primary failure is in the apparently uncontroversial statement that bare pdfs are always positive. We show that under the conditions used in the derivation, that statement fails. We provide some elementary calculations in a model QFT that show how this situation can generically arise in reality. In addition, we observe that the methods used in the derivation are in common with much, but not all, other work where factorization is derived. Our examination pinpoints considerable difficulties with these methods that render them either wrong or highly problematic. The issue of positivity highlights that these methods can lead to wrong results of phenomenological importance. From our analysis we identify the restricted situations in which positivity can be violated.</description><subject>Derivation</subject><subject>Partons</subject><subject>Physics - High Energy Physics - Experiment</subject><subject>Physics - High Energy Physics - Phenomenology</subject><subject>Physics - Nuclear Theory</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tqwzAUREWh0JDmA7qqoWu7uvfq5WUJfUGgXWRvZMsGhcRyJSc0_fo6j9XM4jDMYewBeCGMlPzZxl9_KBAACg6g-Q2bIRHkRiDesUVKG845Ko1S0ozhd0h-9Ac_HjPbuyy2fYg7u_V_dvShz0KXDTaOU3NtfyLbdM9uO7tN7eKac7Z-e10vP_LV1_vn8mWVW4mQOw6y1ETclJ0DV3OFQtfa2MYZAlu6RipOQKXVWjtdWyWwUUY0SmhwADRnj5fZs1A1RL-z8VidxKqz2EQ8XYghhp99m8ZqE_axnz5VKEvUkgiB_gGzCk8o</recordid><startdate>20220428</startdate><enddate>20220428</enddate><creator>Collins, John</creator><creator>Rogers, Ted C</creator><creator>Sato, Nobuo</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220428</creationdate><title>Positivity and renormalization of parton densities</title><author>Collins, John ; Rogers, Ted C ; Sato, Nobuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-d0159733089fd1db06247b78acd831a9dc5603139a777d7ba642c684c6471d113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Derivation</topic><topic>Partons</topic><topic>Physics - High Energy Physics - Experiment</topic><topic>Physics - High Energy Physics - Phenomenology</topic><topic>Physics - Nuclear Theory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Ted C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, John</au><au>Rogers, Ted C</au><au>Sato, Nobuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positivity and renormalization of parton densities</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-04-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>There have been recent debates about whether \(\overline{\text{MS}}\) parton densities exactly obey positivity bounds (including the Soffer bound), and whether the bounds should be applied as a constraint on global fits to parton densities and on nonperturbative calculations. A recent paper (JHEP \({\bf \text{11}}\) (2020) 129) appears to provide a proof of positivity in contradiction with earlier work by other authors. We examine their derivation and find that its primary failure is in the apparently uncontroversial statement that bare pdfs are always positive. We show that under the conditions used in the derivation, that statement fails. We provide some elementary calculations in a model QFT that show how this situation can generically arise in reality. In addition, we observe that the methods used in the derivation are in common with much, but not all, other work where factorization is derived. Our examination pinpoints considerable difficulties with these methods that render them either wrong or highly problematic. The issue of positivity highlights that these methods can lead to wrong results of phenomenological importance. From our analysis we identify the restricted situations in which positivity can be violated.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2111.01170</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2022-04
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2111_01170
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Derivation
Partons
Physics - High Energy Physics - Experiment
Physics - High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Physics - Nuclear Theory
title Positivity and renormalization of parton densities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A46%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positivity%20and%20renormalization%20of%20parton%20densities&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Collins,%20John&rft.date=2022-04-28&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2111.01170&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2592753321%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2592753321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true