Distinguishing $d_{xz}+i d_{yz}$ and $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing in $Sr_2RuO_4$ by high magnetic field H-T phase diagrams

Employing a realistic tight-binding model describing the Fermi surface in the normal state of $Sr_2RuO_4$ we map out magnetic field versus temperature phase diagrams for $d_{x^2-y^2} (B_{1g})$ and $d_{xz}+id_{yz} (E_g)$ pairing types. Both produce (i) a similar Knight shift suppression of $\sim\!80\...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Gupta, R, Shallcross, S, Quintanilla, J, Gradhand, M, Annett, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Gupta, R
Shallcross, S
Quintanilla, J
Gradhand, M
Annett, J
description Employing a realistic tight-binding model describing the Fermi surface in the normal state of $Sr_2RuO_4$ we map out magnetic field versus temperature phase diagrams for $d_{x^2-y^2} (B_{1g})$ and $d_{xz}+id_{yz} (E_g)$ pairing types. Both produce (i) a similar Knight shift suppression of $\sim\!80\%$ and (ii) a bicritical point at $T=0.88$K separating low field second order phase transitions from high field Pauli limiting first order transitions. We find, however, strikingly different phase behaviour within the high field Pauli limiting region. For $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing symmetry an additional lower critical line of first order transitions is found (terminating in a critical point at $T=0.09-0.22$K depending on the choice of Hubbard U parameters) while for $d_{xz}+id_{yz}$ no such additional high field phase transitions are found for any choice of Hubbard U. In conjunction with our earlier finding [{\it Physical Review B} {\bf 102} (23), 235203] for $p$-wave helical pairing of a still different high field phase structure (a lower critical field line meeting the upper critical field line exactly at the bicritical point), we suggest high field Pauli limiting phase structure as a possible route to distinguish pairing symmetries in this material.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2111.00257
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2111_00257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2111_00257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2111_002573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjrsOgkAQRbexMOoHWDkFnQHZFaK9j9CZqDWbUV6TACG7YADDvwtob3Vubk5xGFty23L2rmtvUNX0sgTn3LJt4e6mTB9Jl5THFemkBxiBfNdttyboR9N2BmAefF9fmI0v-qdAUoNLORg3JcW1ukjHgEcDCcUJZBjnYUlPiChMA_DMOxQJ6hACwlhhpudsEmGqw8WPM7Y6n-4HzxzzZKEoQ9XIIVOOmdv_xgfj-UcF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinguishing $d_{xz}+i d_{yz}$ and $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing in $Sr_2RuO_4$ by high magnetic field H-T phase diagrams</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Gupta, R ; Shallcross, S ; Quintanilla, J ; Gradhand, M ; Annett, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gupta, R ; Shallcross, S ; Quintanilla, J ; Gradhand, M ; Annett, J</creatorcontrib><description>Employing a realistic tight-binding model describing the Fermi surface in the normal state of $Sr_2RuO_4$ we map out magnetic field versus temperature phase diagrams for $d_{x^2-y^2} (B_{1g})$ and $d_{xz}+id_{yz} (E_g)$ pairing types. Both produce (i) a similar Knight shift suppression of $\sim\!80\%$ and (ii) a bicritical point at $T=0.88$K separating low field second order phase transitions from high field Pauli limiting first order transitions. We find, however, strikingly different phase behaviour within the high field Pauli limiting region. For $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing symmetry an additional lower critical line of first order transitions is found (terminating in a critical point at $T=0.09-0.22$K depending on the choice of Hubbard U parameters) while for $d_{xz}+id_{yz}$ no such additional high field phase transitions are found for any choice of Hubbard U. In conjunction with our earlier finding [{\it Physical Review B} {\bf 102} (23), 235203] for $p$-wave helical pairing of a still different high field phase structure (a lower critical field line meeting the upper critical field line exactly at the bicritical point), we suggest high field Pauli limiting phase structure as a possible route to distinguish pairing symmetries in this material.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.00257</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Physics - Superconductivity</subject><creationdate>2021-10</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2111.00257$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.115126$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.00257$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gupta, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shallcross, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintanilla, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gradhand, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annett, J</creatorcontrib><title>Distinguishing $d_{xz}+i d_{yz}$ and $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing in $Sr_2RuO_4$ by high magnetic field H-T phase diagrams</title><description>Employing a realistic tight-binding model describing the Fermi surface in the normal state of $Sr_2RuO_4$ we map out magnetic field versus temperature phase diagrams for $d_{x^2-y^2} (B_{1g})$ and $d_{xz}+id_{yz} (E_g)$ pairing types. Both produce (i) a similar Knight shift suppression of $\sim\!80\%$ and (ii) a bicritical point at $T=0.88$K separating low field second order phase transitions from high field Pauli limiting first order transitions. We find, however, strikingly different phase behaviour within the high field Pauli limiting region. For $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing symmetry an additional lower critical line of first order transitions is found (terminating in a critical point at $T=0.09-0.22$K depending on the choice of Hubbard U parameters) while for $d_{xz}+id_{yz}$ no such additional high field phase transitions are found for any choice of Hubbard U. In conjunction with our earlier finding [{\it Physical Review B} {\bf 102} (23), 235203] for $p$-wave helical pairing of a still different high field phase structure (a lower critical field line meeting the upper critical field line exactly at the bicritical point), we suggest high field Pauli limiting phase structure as a possible route to distinguish pairing symmetries in this material.</description><subject>Physics - Superconductivity</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjrsOgkAQRbexMOoHWDkFnQHZFaK9j9CZqDWbUV6TACG7YADDvwtob3Vubk5xGFty23L2rmtvUNX0sgTn3LJt4e6mTB9Jl5THFemkBxiBfNdttyboR9N2BmAefF9fmI0v-qdAUoNLORg3JcW1ukjHgEcDCcUJZBjnYUlPiChMA_DMOxQJ6hACwlhhpudsEmGqw8WPM7Y6n-4HzxzzZKEoQ9XIIVOOmdv_xgfj-UcF</recordid><startdate>20211030</startdate><enddate>20211030</enddate><creator>Gupta, R</creator><creator>Shallcross, S</creator><creator>Quintanilla, J</creator><creator>Gradhand, M</creator><creator>Annett, J</creator><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211030</creationdate><title>Distinguishing $d_{xz}+i d_{yz}$ and $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing in $Sr_2RuO_4$ by high magnetic field H-T phase diagrams</title><author>Gupta, R ; Shallcross, S ; Quintanilla, J ; Gradhand, M ; Annett, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2111_002573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Physics - Superconductivity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gupta, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shallcross, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintanilla, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gradhand, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annett, J</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gupta, R</au><au>Shallcross, S</au><au>Quintanilla, J</au><au>Gradhand, M</au><au>Annett, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distinguishing $d_{xz}+i d_{yz}$ and $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing in $Sr_2RuO_4$ by high magnetic field H-T phase diagrams</atitle><date>2021-10-30</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Employing a realistic tight-binding model describing the Fermi surface in the normal state of $Sr_2RuO_4$ we map out magnetic field versus temperature phase diagrams for $d_{x^2-y^2} (B_{1g})$ and $d_{xz}+id_{yz} (E_g)$ pairing types. Both produce (i) a similar Knight shift suppression of $\sim\!80\%$ and (ii) a bicritical point at $T=0.88$K separating low field second order phase transitions from high field Pauli limiting first order transitions. We find, however, strikingly different phase behaviour within the high field Pauli limiting region. For $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing symmetry an additional lower critical line of first order transitions is found (terminating in a critical point at $T=0.09-0.22$K depending on the choice of Hubbard U parameters) while for $d_{xz}+id_{yz}$ no such additional high field phase transitions are found for any choice of Hubbard U. In conjunction with our earlier finding [{\it Physical Review B} {\bf 102} (23), 235203] for $p$-wave helical pairing of a still different high field phase structure (a lower critical field line meeting the upper critical field line exactly at the bicritical point), we suggest high field Pauli limiting phase structure as a possible route to distinguish pairing symmetries in this material.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2111.00257</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.00257
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2111_00257
source arXiv.org
subjects Physics - Superconductivity
title Distinguishing $d_{xz}+i d_{yz}$ and $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing in $Sr_2RuO_4$ by high magnetic field H-T phase diagrams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T07%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distinguishing%20$d_%7Bxz%7D+i%20d_%7Byz%7D$%20and%20$d_%7Bx%5E2-y%5E2%7D$%20pairing%20in%20$Sr_2RuO_4$%20by%20high%20magnetic%20field%20H-T%20phase%20diagrams&rft.au=Gupta,%20R&rft.date=2021-10-30&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2111.00257&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2111_00257%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true