Identifying optimal photovoltaic technologies for underwater applications

Improving solar energy collection in aquatic environments would allow for superior environmental monitoring and remote sensing, but the identification of optimal photovoltaic technologies for such applications is challenging as evaluation requires either field deployment or access to large water tan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Röhr, Jason A, Sartor, Ed, Duenow, Joel N, Qin, Zilun, Meng, Juan, Lipton, Jason, Maclean, Stephen A, Römer, Udo, Nielsen, Michael P, Zhao, Suling, Kong, Jaemin, Reese, Matthew O, Steiner, Myles A, Ekins-Daukes, N. J, Taylor, André D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Röhr, Jason A
Sartor, Ed
Duenow, Joel N
Qin, Zilun
Meng, Juan
Lipton, Jason
Maclean, Stephen A
Römer, Udo
Nielsen, Michael P
Zhao, Suling
Kong, Jaemin
Reese, Matthew O
Steiner, Myles A
Ekins-Daukes, N. J
Taylor, André D
description Improving solar energy collection in aquatic environments would allow for superior environmental monitoring and remote sensing, but the identification of optimal photovoltaic technologies for such applications is challenging as evaluation requires either field deployment or access to large water tanks. Here, we present a simple bench-top characterization technique that does not require direct access to water and therefore circumvents the need for field testing during initial trials of development. Employing LEDs to simulate underwater solar spectra at various depths, we compare Si and CdTe solar cells, two commercially available technologies, with GaInP cells, a technology with a wide band gap close to ideal for underwater solar harvesting. We use this method to show that while Si cells outperform both CdTe and GaInP under terrestrial AM1.5G solar irradiance, both CdTe and GaInP outperform Si at depths > 2 m, with GaInP cells operating with underwater efficiencies exceeding 51%.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2110.12580
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2110_12580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2110_12580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a670-997979f5ba97cea4193789d10abb8f307a16501093ce515c308333b865b52c813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj7FuwyAYhFkyVEkfoFN4AadggoGxitrGUqQu2a0fDAkSBYRp2rx93LS64aQbPt2H0BMlm63knDxD-fGXTUvngbZckgfU96ON1burjyeccvWfEHA-p5ouKVTwBldrzjGFdPJ2wi4V_BVHW76h2oIh5-ANVJ_itEILB2Gyj_-9RMe31-Nu3xw-3vvdy6GBTpBGKTHHcQ1KGAtbqpiQaqQEtJaOEQG044QSxYzllBtGJGNMy45r3hpJ2RKt_7B3lyGX-XG5Dr9Ow92J3QDMK0eD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying optimal photovoltaic technologies for underwater applications</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Röhr, Jason A ; Sartor, Ed ; Duenow, Joel N ; Qin, Zilun ; Meng, Juan ; Lipton, Jason ; Maclean, Stephen A ; Römer, Udo ; Nielsen, Michael P ; Zhao, Suling ; Kong, Jaemin ; Reese, Matthew O ; Steiner, Myles A ; Ekins-Daukes, N. J ; Taylor, André D</creator><creatorcontrib>Röhr, Jason A ; Sartor, Ed ; Duenow, Joel N ; Qin, Zilun ; Meng, Juan ; Lipton, Jason ; Maclean, Stephen A ; Römer, Udo ; Nielsen, Michael P ; Zhao, Suling ; Kong, Jaemin ; Reese, Matthew O ; Steiner, Myles A ; Ekins-Daukes, N. J ; Taylor, André D</creatorcontrib><description>Improving solar energy collection in aquatic environments would allow for superior environmental monitoring and remote sensing, but the identification of optimal photovoltaic technologies for such applications is challenging as evaluation requires either field deployment or access to large water tanks. Here, we present a simple bench-top characterization technique that does not require direct access to water and therefore circumvents the need for field testing during initial trials of development. Employing LEDs to simulate underwater solar spectra at various depths, we compare Si and CdTe solar cells, two commercially available technologies, with GaInP cells, a technology with a wide band gap close to ideal for underwater solar harvesting. We use this method to show that while Si cells outperform both CdTe and GaInP under terrestrial AM1.5G solar irradiance, both CdTe and GaInP outperform Si at depths &gt; 2 m, with GaInP cells operating with underwater efficiencies exceeding 51%.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.12580</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Physics - Applied Physics</subject><creationdate>2021-10</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2110.12580$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.12580$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Röhr, Jason A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartor, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duenow, Joel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Zilun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipton, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maclean, Stephen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Römer, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Suling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Jaemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, Matthew O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Myles A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekins-Daukes, N. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, André D</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying optimal photovoltaic technologies for underwater applications</title><description>Improving solar energy collection in aquatic environments would allow for superior environmental monitoring and remote sensing, but the identification of optimal photovoltaic technologies for such applications is challenging as evaluation requires either field deployment or access to large water tanks. Here, we present a simple bench-top characterization technique that does not require direct access to water and therefore circumvents the need for field testing during initial trials of development. Employing LEDs to simulate underwater solar spectra at various depths, we compare Si and CdTe solar cells, two commercially available technologies, with GaInP cells, a technology with a wide band gap close to ideal for underwater solar harvesting. We use this method to show that while Si cells outperform both CdTe and GaInP under terrestrial AM1.5G solar irradiance, both CdTe and GaInP outperform Si at depths &gt; 2 m, with GaInP cells operating with underwater efficiencies exceeding 51%.</description><subject>Physics - Applied Physics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj7FuwyAYhFkyVEkfoFN4AadggoGxitrGUqQu2a0fDAkSBYRp2rx93LS64aQbPt2H0BMlm63knDxD-fGXTUvngbZckgfU96ON1burjyeccvWfEHA-p5ouKVTwBldrzjGFdPJ2wi4V_BVHW76h2oIh5-ANVJ_itEILB2Gyj_-9RMe31-Nu3xw-3vvdy6GBTpBGKTHHcQ1KGAtbqpiQaqQEtJaOEQG044QSxYzllBtGJGNMy45r3hpJ2RKt_7B3lyGX-XG5Dr9Ow92J3QDMK0eD</recordid><startdate>20211024</startdate><enddate>20211024</enddate><creator>Röhr, Jason A</creator><creator>Sartor, Ed</creator><creator>Duenow, Joel N</creator><creator>Qin, Zilun</creator><creator>Meng, Juan</creator><creator>Lipton, Jason</creator><creator>Maclean, Stephen A</creator><creator>Römer, Udo</creator><creator>Nielsen, Michael P</creator><creator>Zhao, Suling</creator><creator>Kong, Jaemin</creator><creator>Reese, Matthew O</creator><creator>Steiner, Myles A</creator><creator>Ekins-Daukes, N. J</creator><creator>Taylor, André D</creator><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211024</creationdate><title>Identifying optimal photovoltaic technologies for underwater applications</title><author>Röhr, Jason A ; Sartor, Ed ; Duenow, Joel N ; Qin, Zilun ; Meng, Juan ; Lipton, Jason ; Maclean, Stephen A ; Römer, Udo ; Nielsen, Michael P ; Zhao, Suling ; Kong, Jaemin ; Reese, Matthew O ; Steiner, Myles A ; Ekins-Daukes, N. J ; Taylor, André D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a670-997979f5ba97cea4193789d10abb8f307a16501093ce515c308333b865b52c813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Physics - Applied Physics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Röhr, Jason A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartor, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duenow, Joel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Zilun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipton, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maclean, Stephen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Römer, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Suling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Jaemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, Matthew O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Myles A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekins-Daukes, N. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, André D</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Röhr, Jason A</au><au>Sartor, Ed</au><au>Duenow, Joel N</au><au>Qin, Zilun</au><au>Meng, Juan</au><au>Lipton, Jason</au><au>Maclean, Stephen A</au><au>Römer, Udo</au><au>Nielsen, Michael P</au><au>Zhao, Suling</au><au>Kong, Jaemin</au><au>Reese, Matthew O</au><au>Steiner, Myles A</au><au>Ekins-Daukes, N. J</au><au>Taylor, André D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying optimal photovoltaic technologies for underwater applications</atitle><date>2021-10-24</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Improving solar energy collection in aquatic environments would allow for superior environmental monitoring and remote sensing, but the identification of optimal photovoltaic technologies for such applications is challenging as evaluation requires either field deployment or access to large water tanks. Here, we present a simple bench-top characterization technique that does not require direct access to water and therefore circumvents the need for field testing during initial trials of development. Employing LEDs to simulate underwater solar spectra at various depths, we compare Si and CdTe solar cells, two commercially available technologies, with GaInP cells, a technology with a wide band gap close to ideal for underwater solar harvesting. We use this method to show that while Si cells outperform both CdTe and GaInP under terrestrial AM1.5G solar irradiance, both CdTe and GaInP outperform Si at depths &gt; 2 m, with GaInP cells operating with underwater efficiencies exceeding 51%.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2110.12580</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.12580
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2110_12580
source arXiv.org
subjects Physics - Applied Physics
title Identifying optimal photovoltaic technologies for underwater applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A59%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20optimal%20photovoltaic%20technologies%20for%20underwater%20applications&rft.au=R%C3%B6hr,%20Jason%20A&rft.date=2021-10-24&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2110.12580&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2110_12580%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true