Three-Layer Joint Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Framework for Optimal Day-Ahead Scheduling of E-mobility Ecosystem
A high number of electric vehicles (EVs) in the transportation sector necessitates an advanced scheduling framework for e-mobility ecosystem operation as a whole in order to overcome range anxiety and create a viable business model for charging stations (CSs). The framework must account for the stoc...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A high number of electric vehicles (EVs) in the transportation sector
necessitates an advanced scheduling framework for e-mobility ecosystem
operation as a whole in order to overcome range anxiety and create a viable
business model for charging stations (CSs). The framework must account for the
stochastic nature of all stakeholders' operations, including EV drivers, CSs,
and retailers and their mutual interactions. In this paper, a three-layer joint
distributionally robust chance-constrained (DRCC) model is proposed to plan
grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) operation in day-ahead for
e-mobility ecosystems. The proposed stochastic model does not rely on a
specific probability distribution for stochastic parameters. To solve the
problem, an iterative process is proposed using joint DRCC formulation. To
achieve computational traceability, the exact reformulation is implemented for
double-sided and single-sided chance constraints (CCs). Furthermore, the impact
of temporal correlation of uncertain PV generation on CSs operation is
considered. A simulation study is carried out for an ecosystem of three
retailers, nine CSs, and 600 EVs based on real data from San Francisco, the
USA. The simulation results show the necessity and applicability of such a
scheduling method for the e-mobility ecosystem in an uncertain environment,
e.g., by reducing the number of unique EVs that failed to reach their
destination from 272 to 61. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2110.12123 |