SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes
Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) play an increasingly important role in psychological and behavioral health research. This experimental approach enables researchers to answer scientific questions about how to sequence and match interventions to the unique, changing needs of...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Dziak, John J Almirall, Daniel Dempsey, Walter Stanger, Catherine Nahum-Shani, Inbal |
description | Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) play an
increasingly important role in psychological and behavioral health research.
This experimental approach enables researchers to answer scientific questions
about how to sequence and match interventions to the unique, changing needs of
individuals. A variety of sample size planning resources for SMART studies have
been developed in recent years; these enable researchers to plan SMARTs for
addressing different types of scientific questions. However, relatively limited
attention has been given to planning SMARTs with binary (dichotomous) outcomes,
which often require higher sample sizes relative to continuous outcomes.
Existing resources for estimating sample size requirements for SMARTs with
binary outcomes do not consider the potential to improve power by including a
baseline measurement and/or multiple repeated outcome measurements. The current
paper addresses this issue by providing sample size simulation code and
approximate formulas for two-wave repeated measures binary outcomes (i.e., two
measurement times for the outcome variable, before and after receiving the
intervention). The simulation results agree well with the formulas. We also
discuss how to use simulations to calculate power for studies with more than
two outcome measurement occasions. The results show that having at least one
repeated measurement of the outcome can substantially improve power under
certain conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2110.05535 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2110_05535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2110_05535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a675-d769fb2c5fa44d0bdc1ba03f5fc717b9747fc60382d2a82fd976f48300619d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUMlugzAU5NJDlfYDeur7AVKzGENvFHWJRBQp5I4eXlJLYJAxdJH67w1JTiONRrN53kNA1nFKKXlC-63ndRicCEJpRG-9v2qb7w_wog3an2eosBtaCZX-lVBgy6cWne4NqN5C0XcDWm2OkAscnJ4lbIyTdpZm0YygDVzcRjcJLUf40u4Tyt4c9UIYbK85sJsc7zs53nk3CttR3l9x5e3fXg_Fh1_u3jdFXvqYMOoLlmSqCTlVGMeCNIIHDZJIUcVZwJqMxUzxhERpKEJMQyUylqg4jQhJgkxEK-_xYnpeXw9Wd6cO9fJCfX4h-gfjMFlK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Dziak, John J ; Almirall, Daniel ; Dempsey, Walter ; Stanger, Catherine ; Nahum-Shani, Inbal</creator><creatorcontrib>Dziak, John J ; Almirall, Daniel ; Dempsey, Walter ; Stanger, Catherine ; Nahum-Shani, Inbal</creatorcontrib><description>Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) play an
increasingly important role in psychological and behavioral health research.
This experimental approach enables researchers to answer scientific questions
about how to sequence and match interventions to the unique, changing needs of
individuals. A variety of sample size planning resources for SMART studies have
been developed in recent years; these enable researchers to plan SMARTs for
addressing different types of scientific questions. However, relatively limited
attention has been given to planning SMARTs with binary (dichotomous) outcomes,
which often require higher sample sizes relative to continuous outcomes.
Existing resources for estimating sample size requirements for SMARTs with
binary outcomes do not consider the potential to improve power by including a
baseline measurement and/or multiple repeated outcome measurements. The current
paper addresses this issue by providing sample size simulation code and
approximate formulas for two-wave repeated measures binary outcomes (i.e., two
measurement times for the outcome variable, before and after receiving the
intervention). The simulation results agree well with the formulas. We also
discuss how to use simulations to calculate power for studies with more than
two outcome measurement occasions. The results show that having at least one
repeated measurement of the outcome can substantially improve power under
certain conditions.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.05535</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Statistics - Methodology</subject><creationdate>2021-10</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05535$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.05535$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dziak, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almirall, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempsey, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanger, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahum-Shani, Inbal</creatorcontrib><title>SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes</title><description>Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) play an
increasingly important role in psychological and behavioral health research.
This experimental approach enables researchers to answer scientific questions
about how to sequence and match interventions to the unique, changing needs of
individuals. A variety of sample size planning resources for SMART studies have
been developed in recent years; these enable researchers to plan SMARTs for
addressing different types of scientific questions. However, relatively limited
attention has been given to planning SMARTs with binary (dichotomous) outcomes,
which often require higher sample sizes relative to continuous outcomes.
Existing resources for estimating sample size requirements for SMARTs with
binary outcomes do not consider the potential to improve power by including a
baseline measurement and/or multiple repeated outcome measurements. The current
paper addresses this issue by providing sample size simulation code and
approximate formulas for two-wave repeated measures binary outcomes (i.e., two
measurement times for the outcome variable, before and after receiving the
intervention). The simulation results agree well with the formulas. We also
discuss how to use simulations to calculate power for studies with more than
two outcome measurement occasions. The results show that having at least one
repeated measurement of the outcome can substantially improve power under
certain conditions.</description><subject>Statistics - Methodology</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotUMlugzAU5NJDlfYDeur7AVKzGENvFHWJRBQp5I4eXlJLYJAxdJH67w1JTiONRrN53kNA1nFKKXlC-63ndRicCEJpRG-9v2qb7w_wog3an2eosBtaCZX-lVBgy6cWne4NqN5C0XcDWm2OkAscnJ4lbIyTdpZm0YygDVzcRjcJLUf40u4Tyt4c9UIYbK85sJsc7zs53nk3CttR3l9x5e3fXg_Fh1_u3jdFXvqYMOoLlmSqCTlVGMeCNIIHDZJIUcVZwJqMxUzxhERpKEJMQyUylqg4jQhJgkxEK-_xYnpeXw9Wd6cO9fJCfX4h-gfjMFlK</recordid><startdate>20211011</startdate><enddate>20211011</enddate><creator>Dziak, John J</creator><creator>Almirall, Daniel</creator><creator>Dempsey, Walter</creator><creator>Stanger, Catherine</creator><creator>Nahum-Shani, Inbal</creator><scope>EPD</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211011</creationdate><title>SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes</title><author>Dziak, John J ; Almirall, Daniel ; Dempsey, Walter ; Stanger, Catherine ; Nahum-Shani, Inbal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a675-d769fb2c5fa44d0bdc1ba03f5fc717b9747fc60382d2a82fd976f48300619d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Statistics - Methodology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dziak, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almirall, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempsey, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanger, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahum-Shani, Inbal</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Statistics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dziak, John J</au><au>Almirall, Daniel</au><au>Dempsey, Walter</au><au>Stanger, Catherine</au><au>Nahum-Shani, Inbal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes</atitle><date>2021-10-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) play an
increasingly important role in psychological and behavioral health research.
This experimental approach enables researchers to answer scientific questions
about how to sequence and match interventions to the unique, changing needs of
individuals. A variety of sample size planning resources for SMART studies have
been developed in recent years; these enable researchers to plan SMARTs for
addressing different types of scientific questions. However, relatively limited
attention has been given to planning SMARTs with binary (dichotomous) outcomes,
which often require higher sample sizes relative to continuous outcomes.
Existing resources for estimating sample size requirements for SMARTs with
binary outcomes do not consider the potential to improve power by including a
baseline measurement and/or multiple repeated outcome measurements. The current
paper addresses this issue by providing sample size simulation code and
approximate formulas for two-wave repeated measures binary outcomes (i.e., two
measurement times for the outcome variable, before and after receiving the
intervention). The simulation results agree well with the formulas. We also
discuss how to use simulations to calculate power for studies with more than
two outcome measurement occasions. The results show that having at least one
repeated measurement of the outcome can substantially improve power under
certain conditions.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2110.05535</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.05535 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2110_05535 |
source | arXiv.org |
subjects | Statistics - Methodology |
title | SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A08%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SMART%20Binary:%20Sample%20Size%20Calculation%20for%20Comparing%20Adaptive%20Interventions%20in%20SMART%20studies%20with%20Longitudinal%20Binary%20Outcomes&rft.au=Dziak,%20John%20J&rft.date=2021-10-11&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2110.05535&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2110_05535%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |