Projections of Tropical Fermat-Weber Points
In the tropical projective torus, it is not guaranteed that the projection of a Fermat-Weber point of a given data set is a Fermat-Weber point of the projection of the data set. In this paper, we focus on the projection on the tropical triangle (the three-point tropical convex hull), and we develop...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Ding, Weiyi Tang, Xiaoxian |
description | In the tropical projective torus, it is not guaranteed that the projection of
a Fermat-Weber point of a given data set is a Fermat-Weber point of the
projection of the data set. In this paper, we focus on the projection on the
tropical triangle (the three-point tropical convex hull), and we develop one
algorithm (Algorithm 1) and its improved version (Algorithm 4), such that for a
given data set in the tropical projective torus, these algorithms output a
tropical triangle, on which the projection of a Fermat-Weber point of the data
set is a Fermat-Weber point of the projection of the data set. We implement
these algorithms in R and test how it works with random data sets. The
experimental results show that, these algorithms can succeed with a much higher
probability than choosing the tropical triangle randomly, the succeed rate of
these two algorithms is stable while data sets are changing randomly, and
Algorithm 4 can output the results much faster than Algorithm 1 averagely. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2108.10124 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2108_10124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2108_10124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a674-c301eb18d3a4f58c3f37a8007a65d1cc04928634cbf20afbcc09398dd4415fcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzr0KwjAUhuEsDqJegJPdpfWkSdp0FPEPBB0KjuUkTSDSGkmL6N37O33wDh8PIVMKCZdCwALDw92TlIJMKNCUD8n8FPzF6N75axd5G5XB35zGJtqY0GIfn40yITp5d-27MRlYbDoz-e-IlJt1udrFh-N2v1oeYsxyHmsG1Cgqa4bcCqmZZTlKgBwzUVOtgRepzBjXyqaAVr1LwQpZ15xTYbViIzL73X611S24FsOz-qirr5q9AKnJPAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Projections of Tropical Fermat-Weber Points</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Ding, Weiyi ; Tang, Xiaoxian</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Weiyi ; Tang, Xiaoxian</creatorcontrib><description>In the tropical projective torus, it is not guaranteed that the projection of
a Fermat-Weber point of a given data set is a Fermat-Weber point of the
projection of the data set. In this paper, we focus on the projection on the
tropical triangle (the three-point tropical convex hull), and we develop one
algorithm (Algorithm 1) and its improved version (Algorithm 4), such that for a
given data set in the tropical projective torus, these algorithms output a
tropical triangle, on which the projection of a Fermat-Weber point of the data
set is a Fermat-Weber point of the projection of the data set. We implement
these algorithms in R and test how it works with random data sets. The
experimental results show that, these algorithms can succeed with a much higher
probability than choosing the tropical triangle randomly, the succeed rate of
these two algorithms is stable while data sets are changing randomly, and
Algorithm 4 can output the results much faster than Algorithm 1 averagely.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2108.10124</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Mathematics - Combinatorics</subject><creationdate>2021-08</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10124$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.10124$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Weiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xiaoxian</creatorcontrib><title>Projections of Tropical Fermat-Weber Points</title><description>In the tropical projective torus, it is not guaranteed that the projection of
a Fermat-Weber point of a given data set is a Fermat-Weber point of the
projection of the data set. In this paper, we focus on the projection on the
tropical triangle (the three-point tropical convex hull), and we develop one
algorithm (Algorithm 1) and its improved version (Algorithm 4), such that for a
given data set in the tropical projective torus, these algorithms output a
tropical triangle, on which the projection of a Fermat-Weber point of the data
set is a Fermat-Weber point of the projection of the data set. We implement
these algorithms in R and test how it works with random data sets. The
experimental results show that, these algorithms can succeed with a much higher
probability than choosing the tropical triangle randomly, the succeed rate of
these two algorithms is stable while data sets are changing randomly, and
Algorithm 4 can output the results much faster than Algorithm 1 averagely.</description><subject>Mathematics - Combinatorics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzr0KwjAUhuEsDqJegJPdpfWkSdp0FPEPBB0KjuUkTSDSGkmL6N37O33wDh8PIVMKCZdCwALDw92TlIJMKNCUD8n8FPzF6N75axd5G5XB35zGJtqY0GIfn40yITp5d-27MRlYbDoz-e-IlJt1udrFh-N2v1oeYsxyHmsG1Cgqa4bcCqmZZTlKgBwzUVOtgRepzBjXyqaAVr1LwQpZ15xTYbViIzL73X611S24FsOz-qirr5q9AKnJPAg</recordid><startdate>20210823</startdate><enddate>20210823</enddate><creator>Ding, Weiyi</creator><creator>Tang, Xiaoxian</creator><scope>AKZ</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210823</creationdate><title>Projections of Tropical Fermat-Weber Points</title><author>Ding, Weiyi ; Tang, Xiaoxian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a674-c301eb18d3a4f58c3f37a8007a65d1cc04928634cbf20afbcc09398dd4415fcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Mathematics - Combinatorics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Weiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xiaoxian</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Mathematics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Weiyi</au><au>Tang, Xiaoxian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Projections of Tropical Fermat-Weber Points</atitle><date>2021-08-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>In the tropical projective torus, it is not guaranteed that the projection of
a Fermat-Weber point of a given data set is a Fermat-Weber point of the
projection of the data set. In this paper, we focus on the projection on the
tropical triangle (the three-point tropical convex hull), and we develop one
algorithm (Algorithm 1) and its improved version (Algorithm 4), such that for a
given data set in the tropical projective torus, these algorithms output a
tropical triangle, on which the projection of a Fermat-Weber point of the data
set is a Fermat-Weber point of the projection of the data set. We implement
these algorithms in R and test how it works with random data sets. The
experimental results show that, these algorithms can succeed with a much higher
probability than choosing the tropical triangle randomly, the succeed rate of
these two algorithms is stable while data sets are changing randomly, and
Algorithm 4 can output the results much faster than Algorithm 1 averagely.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2108.10124</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2108.10124 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2108_10124 |
source | arXiv.org |
subjects | Mathematics - Combinatorics |
title | Projections of Tropical Fermat-Weber Points |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A01%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Projections%20of%20Tropical%20Fermat-Weber%20Points&rft.au=Ding,%20Weiyi&rft.date=2021-08-23&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2108.10124&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2108_10124%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |