Impact of the absorber coupling design for Transition Edge Sensor X-ray Calorimeters
Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) are the selected technology for future spaceborne X-ray observatories, such as Athena, Lynx, and HUBS. These missions demand thousands of pixels to be operated simultaneously with high energy-resolving power. To reach these demanding requirements, every aspect of the T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2021-07 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | de Wit, M Gottardi, L Taralli, E Nagayoshi, K Ridder, M L Akamatsu, H Bruijn, M P Hoogeveen, R W M van der Kuur, J Ravensberg, K Vaccaro, D J-R Gao den Herder, J-W A |
description | Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) are the selected technology for future spaceborne X-ray observatories, such as Athena, Lynx, and HUBS. These missions demand thousands of pixels to be operated simultaneously with high energy-resolving power. To reach these demanding requirements, every aspect of the TES design has to be optimized. Here we present the experimental results of tests on different devices where the coupling between the x-ray absorber and the TES sensor is varied. In particular, we look at the effects of the diameter of the coupling stems and the distance between the stems and the TES bilayer. Based on measurements of the AC complex impedance and noise, we observe a reduction in the excess noise as the spacing between the absorber stem and the bilayer is decreased. We identify the origin of this excess noise to be internal thermal fluctuation noise between the absorber stem and the bilayer. Additionally, we see an impact of the coupling on the superconducting transition in the appearance of kinks. Our observations show that these unwanted structures in the transition shape can be avoided with careful design of the coupling geometry. Also the stem diameter appears to have a significant impact on the smoothness of the TES transition. This observation is still poorly understood, but is of great importance for both AC and DC biased TESs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2107.09552 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2107_09552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553632031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-ca4ab794f4cca152405ab5646e922b512fdf6a75635031243e6cb7d126bef8fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjz1PwzAURS0kJKrSH8CEJeYU-9nPaUdUFahUiYEMbNFzYpdUbRzsFNF_T_ox3eXo3nsYe5BiqmeI4pniX_M7BSnyqZgjwg0bgVIym2mAOzZJaSuEAJMDohqxYrXvqOp58Lz_dpxsCtG6yKtw6HZNu-G1S82m5T5EXkRqU9M3oeXLeuP4p2sHmn9lkY58QbsQm73rXUz37NbTLrnJNceseF0Wi_ds_fG2WrysM0KQWUWabD7XXlcVSQQtkCwabdwcwKIEX3tDORqFQknQypnK5rUEY52f-VqN2eOl9qxcdsM8xWN5Ui_P6gPxdCG6GH4OLvXlNhxiO3wqT_pGwdCs_gHjx1vo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553632031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the absorber coupling design for Transition Edge Sensor X-ray Calorimeters</title><source>Ejournal Publishers (free content)</source><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>de Wit, M ; Gottardi, L ; Taralli, E ; Nagayoshi, K ; Ridder, M L ; Akamatsu, H ; Bruijn, M P ; Hoogeveen, R W M ; van der Kuur, J ; Ravensberg, K ; Vaccaro, D ; J-R Gao ; den Herder, J-W A</creator><creatorcontrib>de Wit, M ; Gottardi, L ; Taralli, E ; Nagayoshi, K ; Ridder, M L ; Akamatsu, H ; Bruijn, M P ; Hoogeveen, R W M ; van der Kuur, J ; Ravensberg, K ; Vaccaro, D ; J-R Gao ; den Herder, J-W A</creatorcontrib><description>Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) are the selected technology for future spaceborne X-ray observatories, such as Athena, Lynx, and HUBS. These missions demand thousands of pixels to be operated simultaneously with high energy-resolving power. To reach these demanding requirements, every aspect of the TES design has to be optimized. Here we present the experimental results of tests on different devices where the coupling between the x-ray absorber and the TES sensor is varied. In particular, we look at the effects of the diameter of the coupling stems and the distance between the stems and the TES bilayer. Based on measurements of the AC complex impedance and noise, we observe a reduction in the excess noise as the spacing between the absorber stem and the bilayer is decreased. We identify the origin of this excess noise to be internal thermal fluctuation noise between the absorber stem and the bilayer. Additionally, we see an impact of the coupling on the superconducting transition in the appearance of kinks. Our observations show that these unwanted structures in the transition shape can be avoided with careful design of the coupling geometry. Also the stem diameter appears to have a significant impact on the smoothness of the TES transition. This observation is still poorly understood, but is of great importance for both AC and DC biased TESs.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.09552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Absorbers ; Coupling ; Design optimization ; Diameters ; Noise ; Observatories ; Physics - Instrumentation and Detectors ; Physics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics ; Resolution ; Smoothness</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-07</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,784,885,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.044059$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.09552$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Wit, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottardi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taralli, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagayoshi, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridder, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akamatsu, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruijn, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogeveen, R W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Kuur, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravensberg, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaccaro, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J-R Gao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Herder, J-W A</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the absorber coupling design for Transition Edge Sensor X-ray Calorimeters</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) are the selected technology for future spaceborne X-ray observatories, such as Athena, Lynx, and HUBS. These missions demand thousands of pixels to be operated simultaneously with high energy-resolving power. To reach these demanding requirements, every aspect of the TES design has to be optimized. Here we present the experimental results of tests on different devices where the coupling between the x-ray absorber and the TES sensor is varied. In particular, we look at the effects of the diameter of the coupling stems and the distance between the stems and the TES bilayer. Based on measurements of the AC complex impedance and noise, we observe a reduction in the excess noise as the spacing between the absorber stem and the bilayer is decreased. We identify the origin of this excess noise to be internal thermal fluctuation noise between the absorber stem and the bilayer. Additionally, we see an impact of the coupling on the superconducting transition in the appearance of kinks. Our observations show that these unwanted structures in the transition shape can be avoided with careful design of the coupling geometry. Also the stem diameter appears to have a significant impact on the smoothness of the TES transition. This observation is still poorly understood, but is of great importance for both AC and DC biased TESs.</description><subject>Absorbers</subject><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Observatories</subject><subject>Physics - Instrumentation and Detectors</subject><subject>Physics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Smoothness</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotjz1PwzAURS0kJKrSH8CEJeYU-9nPaUdUFahUiYEMbNFzYpdUbRzsFNF_T_ox3eXo3nsYe5BiqmeI4pniX_M7BSnyqZgjwg0bgVIym2mAOzZJaSuEAJMDohqxYrXvqOp58Lz_dpxsCtG6yKtw6HZNu-G1S82m5T5EXkRqU9M3oeXLeuP4p2sHmn9lkY58QbsQm73rXUz37NbTLrnJNceseF0Wi_ds_fG2WrysM0KQWUWabD7XXlcVSQQtkCwabdwcwKIEX3tDORqFQknQypnK5rUEY52f-VqN2eOl9qxcdsM8xWN5Ui_P6gPxdCG6GH4OLvXlNhxiO3wqT_pGwdCs_gHjx1vo</recordid><startdate>20210720</startdate><enddate>20210720</enddate><creator>de Wit, M</creator><creator>Gottardi, L</creator><creator>Taralli, E</creator><creator>Nagayoshi, K</creator><creator>Ridder, M L</creator><creator>Akamatsu, H</creator><creator>Bruijn, M P</creator><creator>Hoogeveen, R W M</creator><creator>van der Kuur, J</creator><creator>Ravensberg, K</creator><creator>Vaccaro, D</creator><creator>J-R Gao</creator><creator>den Herder, J-W A</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210720</creationdate><title>Impact of the absorber coupling design for Transition Edge Sensor X-ray Calorimeters</title><author>de Wit, M ; Gottardi, L ; Taralli, E ; Nagayoshi, K ; Ridder, M L ; Akamatsu, H ; Bruijn, M P ; Hoogeveen, R W M ; van der Kuur, J ; Ravensberg, K ; Vaccaro, D ; J-R Gao ; den Herder, J-W A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-ca4ab794f4cca152405ab5646e922b512fdf6a75635031243e6cb7d126bef8fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Absorbers</topic><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Observatories</topic><topic>Physics - Instrumentation and Detectors</topic><topic>Physics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Smoothness</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Wit, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottardi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taralli, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagayoshi, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridder, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akamatsu, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruijn, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogeveen, R W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Kuur, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravensberg, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaccaro, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J-R Gao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Herder, J-W A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Wit, M</au><au>Gottardi, L</au><au>Taralli, E</au><au>Nagayoshi, K</au><au>Ridder, M L</au><au>Akamatsu, H</au><au>Bruijn, M P</au><au>Hoogeveen, R W M</au><au>van der Kuur, J</au><au>Ravensberg, K</au><au>Vaccaro, D</au><au>J-R Gao</au><au>den Herder, J-W A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the absorber coupling design for Transition Edge Sensor X-ray Calorimeters</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-07-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) are the selected technology for future spaceborne X-ray observatories, such as Athena, Lynx, and HUBS. These missions demand thousands of pixels to be operated simultaneously with high energy-resolving power. To reach these demanding requirements, every aspect of the TES design has to be optimized. Here we present the experimental results of tests on different devices where the coupling between the x-ray absorber and the TES sensor is varied. In particular, we look at the effects of the diameter of the coupling stems and the distance between the stems and the TES bilayer. Based on measurements of the AC complex impedance and noise, we observe a reduction in the excess noise as the spacing between the absorber stem and the bilayer is decreased. We identify the origin of this excess noise to be internal thermal fluctuation noise between the absorber stem and the bilayer. Additionally, we see an impact of the coupling on the superconducting transition in the appearance of kinks. Our observations show that these unwanted structures in the transition shape can be avoided with careful design of the coupling geometry. Also the stem diameter appears to have a significant impact on the smoothness of the TES transition. This observation is still poorly understood, but is of great importance for both AC and DC biased TESs.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2107.09552</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2021-07 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2107_09552 |
source | Ejournal Publishers (free content); arXiv.org |
subjects | Absorbers Coupling Design optimization Diameters Noise Observatories Physics - Instrumentation and Detectors Physics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics Resolution Smoothness |
title | Impact of the absorber coupling design for Transition Edge Sensor X-ray Calorimeters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T04%3A35%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20absorber%20coupling%20design%20for%20Transition%20Edge%20Sensor%20X-ray%20Calorimeters&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=de%20Wit,%20M&rft.date=2021-07-20&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2107.09552&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2553632031%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553632031&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |