A Witness Two-Sample Test

The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) has been the state-of-the-art nonparametric test for tackling the two-sample problem. Its statistic is given by the difference in expectations of the witness function, a real-valued function defined as a weighted sum of kernel evaluations on a set of basis points....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kübler, Jonas M, Jitkrittum, Wittawat, Schölkopf, Bernhard, Muandet, Krikamol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Kübler, Jonas M
Jitkrittum, Wittawat
Schölkopf, Bernhard
Muandet, Krikamol
description The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) has been the state-of-the-art nonparametric test for tackling the two-sample problem. Its statistic is given by the difference in expectations of the witness function, a real-valued function defined as a weighted sum of kernel evaluations on a set of basis points. Typically the kernel is optimized on a training set, and hypothesis testing is performed on a separate test set to avoid overfitting (i.e., control type-I error). That is, the test set is used to simultaneously estimate the expectations and define the basis points, while the training set only serves to select the kernel and is discarded. In this work, we propose to use the training data to also define the weights and the basis points for better data efficiency. We show that 1) the new test is consistent and has a well-controlled type-I error; 2) the optimal witness function is given by a precision-weighted mean in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space associated with the kernel; and 3) the test power of the proposed test is comparable or exceeds that of the MMD and other modern tests, as verified empirically on challenging synthetic and real problems (e.g., Higgs data).
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2102.05573
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2102_05573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2102_05573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a673-25c53186c9ba2fb9befcf94c5a7f615375eb5398594e4cfd9572087e07c8c5363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzrsOgjAYhuEuDga9ACa5AbC0_D2MhHhKSBxs4kja2iYkoASIh7tX0emb3i8PQmGKk0wA4LXun_U9ISkmCQbgdI7CPDrX49UNQ6Qet_ik265xkXLDuEAzr5vBLf8bILXdqGIfl8fdocjLWDNOYwIWaCqYlUYTb6Rx3nqZWdDcsxQoB2eASgEyc5n1FwmcYMEd5lZ8SkYDtPrdTraq6-tW96_qa6wmI30DZZI0gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Witness Two-Sample Test</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Kübler, Jonas M ; Jitkrittum, Wittawat ; Schölkopf, Bernhard ; Muandet, Krikamol</creator><creatorcontrib>Kübler, Jonas M ; Jitkrittum, Wittawat ; Schölkopf, Bernhard ; Muandet, Krikamol</creatorcontrib><description>The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) has been the state-of-the-art nonparametric test for tackling the two-sample problem. Its statistic is given by the difference in expectations of the witness function, a real-valued function defined as a weighted sum of kernel evaluations on a set of basis points. Typically the kernel is optimized on a training set, and hypothesis testing is performed on a separate test set to avoid overfitting (i.e., control type-I error). That is, the test set is used to simultaneously estimate the expectations and define the basis points, while the training set only serves to select the kernel and is discarded. In this work, we propose to use the training data to also define the weights and the basis points for better data efficiency. We show that 1) the new test is consistent and has a well-controlled type-I error; 2) the optimal witness function is given by a precision-weighted mean in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space associated with the kernel; and 3) the test power of the proposed test is comparable or exceeds that of the MMD and other modern tests, as verified empirically on challenging synthetic and real problems (e.g., Higgs data).</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.05573</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Learning ; Statistics - Machine Learning</subject><creationdate>2021-02</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2102.05573$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.05573$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kübler, Jonas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitkrittum, Wittawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schölkopf, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muandet, Krikamol</creatorcontrib><title>A Witness Two-Sample Test</title><description>The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) has been the state-of-the-art nonparametric test for tackling the two-sample problem. Its statistic is given by the difference in expectations of the witness function, a real-valued function defined as a weighted sum of kernel evaluations on a set of basis points. Typically the kernel is optimized on a training set, and hypothesis testing is performed on a separate test set to avoid overfitting (i.e., control type-I error). That is, the test set is used to simultaneously estimate the expectations and define the basis points, while the training set only serves to select the kernel and is discarded. In this work, we propose to use the training data to also define the weights and the basis points for better data efficiency. We show that 1) the new test is consistent and has a well-controlled type-I error; 2) the optimal witness function is given by a precision-weighted mean in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space associated with the kernel; and 3) the test power of the proposed test is comparable or exceeds that of the MMD and other modern tests, as verified empirically on challenging synthetic and real problems (e.g., Higgs data).</description><subject>Computer Science - Learning</subject><subject>Statistics - Machine Learning</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzrsOgjAYhuEuDga9ACa5AbC0_D2MhHhKSBxs4kja2iYkoASIh7tX0emb3i8PQmGKk0wA4LXun_U9ISkmCQbgdI7CPDrX49UNQ6Qet_ik265xkXLDuEAzr5vBLf8bILXdqGIfl8fdocjLWDNOYwIWaCqYlUYTb6Rx3nqZWdDcsxQoB2eASgEyc5n1FwmcYMEd5lZ8SkYDtPrdTraq6-tW96_qa6wmI30DZZI0gw</recordid><startdate>20210210</startdate><enddate>20210210</enddate><creator>Kübler, Jonas M</creator><creator>Jitkrittum, Wittawat</creator><creator>Schölkopf, Bernhard</creator><creator>Muandet, Krikamol</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>EPD</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210210</creationdate><title>A Witness Two-Sample Test</title><author>Kübler, Jonas M ; Jitkrittum, Wittawat ; Schölkopf, Bernhard ; Muandet, Krikamol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a673-25c53186c9ba2fb9befcf94c5a7f615375eb5398594e4cfd9572087e07c8c5363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Learning</topic><topic>Statistics - Machine Learning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kübler, Jonas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitkrittum, Wittawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schölkopf, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muandet, Krikamol</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv Statistics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kübler, Jonas M</au><au>Jitkrittum, Wittawat</au><au>Schölkopf, Bernhard</au><au>Muandet, Krikamol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Witness Two-Sample Test</atitle><date>2021-02-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) has been the state-of-the-art nonparametric test for tackling the two-sample problem. Its statistic is given by the difference in expectations of the witness function, a real-valued function defined as a weighted sum of kernel evaluations on a set of basis points. Typically the kernel is optimized on a training set, and hypothesis testing is performed on a separate test set to avoid overfitting (i.e., control type-I error). That is, the test set is used to simultaneously estimate the expectations and define the basis points, while the training set only serves to select the kernel and is discarded. In this work, we propose to use the training data to also define the weights and the basis points for better data efficiency. We show that 1) the new test is consistent and has a well-controlled type-I error; 2) the optimal witness function is given by a precision-weighted mean in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space associated with the kernel; and 3) the test power of the proposed test is comparable or exceeds that of the MMD and other modern tests, as verified empirically on challenging synthetic and real problems (e.g., Higgs data).</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2102.05573</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.05573
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2102_05573
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Learning
Statistics - Machine Learning
title A Witness Two-Sample Test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A06%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Witness%20Two-Sample%20Test&rft.au=K%C3%BCbler,%20Jonas%20M&rft.date=2021-02-10&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2102.05573&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2102_05573%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true