Enabling Fingerprint Presentation Attacks: Fake Fingerprint Fabrication Techniques and Recognition Performance

Fake fingerprint representation pose a severe threat for fingerprint based authentication systems. Despite advances in presentation attack detection technologies, which are often integrated directly into the fingerprint scanner devices, many fingerprint scanners are still susceptible to presentation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kauba, Christof, Debiasi, Luca, Uhl, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Kauba, Christof
Debiasi, Luca
Uhl, Andreas
description Fake fingerprint representation pose a severe threat for fingerprint based authentication systems. Despite advances in presentation attack detection technologies, which are often integrated directly into the fingerprint scanner devices, many fingerprint scanners are still susceptible to presentation attacks using physical fake fingerprint representation. In this work we evaluate five different commercial-off-the-shelf fingerprint scanners based on different sensing technologies, including optical, optical multispectral, passive capacitive, active capacitive and thermal regarding their susceptibility to presentation attacks using fake fingerprint representations. Several different materials to create the fake representation are tested and evaluated, including wax, cast, latex, silicone, different types of glue, window colours, modelling clay, etc. The quantitative evaluation includes assessing the fingerprint quality of the samples captured from the fake representations as well as comparison experiments where the achieved matching scores of the fake representations against the corresponding real fingerprints indicate the effectiveness of the fake representations. Our results confirmed that all except one of the tested devices are susceptible to at least one type/material of fake fingerprint representations.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2012.00606
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2012_00606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2012_00606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a676-58039322c71e5598bf2c6c32fc3e0cd01a395bf5785372cc893ad3a15f089903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj8FOwzAQRH3hgAofwAn_QMLGxonNraoaQKpEBb1Hm826WG0dcAKCv6ekXLjMHGY0mifEVQH5rTUGbjB9hc9cQaFygBLKcxGXEdt9iFtZH4XTWwpxlOvEA8cRx9BHOR9HpN1wJ2vc8b9ajW0KdGptmF5jeP_gQWLs5DNTv41hitacfJ8OGIkvxJnH_cCXfz4TL_Vys3jIVk_3j4v5KsOyKjNjQTutFFUFG-Ns6xWVpJUnzUAdFKidab2prNGVIrJOY6exMB6sc6Bn4vq0OvE2x7MHTN_NL3czcesfLG1Udg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enabling Fingerprint Presentation Attacks: Fake Fingerprint Fabrication Techniques and Recognition Performance</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Kauba, Christof ; Debiasi, Luca ; Uhl, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Kauba, Christof ; Debiasi, Luca ; Uhl, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Fake fingerprint representation pose a severe threat for fingerprint based authentication systems. Despite advances in presentation attack detection technologies, which are often integrated directly into the fingerprint scanner devices, many fingerprint scanners are still susceptible to presentation attacks using physical fake fingerprint representation. In this work we evaluate five different commercial-off-the-shelf fingerprint scanners based on different sensing technologies, including optical, optical multispectral, passive capacitive, active capacitive and thermal regarding their susceptibility to presentation attacks using fake fingerprint representations. Several different materials to create the fake representation are tested and evaluated, including wax, cast, latex, silicone, different types of glue, window colours, modelling clay, etc. The quantitative evaluation includes assessing the fingerprint quality of the samples captured from the fake representations as well as comparison experiments where the achieved matching scores of the fake representations against the corresponding real fingerprints indicate the effectiveness of the fake representations. Our results confirmed that all except one of the tested devices are susceptible to at least one type/material of fake fingerprint representations.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.00606</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</subject><creationdate>2020-12</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00606$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.00606$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kauba, Christof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debiasi, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Enabling Fingerprint Presentation Attacks: Fake Fingerprint Fabrication Techniques and Recognition Performance</title><description>Fake fingerprint representation pose a severe threat for fingerprint based authentication systems. Despite advances in presentation attack detection technologies, which are often integrated directly into the fingerprint scanner devices, many fingerprint scanners are still susceptible to presentation attacks using physical fake fingerprint representation. In this work we evaluate five different commercial-off-the-shelf fingerprint scanners based on different sensing technologies, including optical, optical multispectral, passive capacitive, active capacitive and thermal regarding their susceptibility to presentation attacks using fake fingerprint representations. Several different materials to create the fake representation are tested and evaluated, including wax, cast, latex, silicone, different types of glue, window colours, modelling clay, etc. The quantitative evaluation includes assessing the fingerprint quality of the samples captured from the fake representations as well as comparison experiments where the achieved matching scores of the fake representations against the corresponding real fingerprints indicate the effectiveness of the fake representations. Our results confirmed that all except one of the tested devices are susceptible to at least one type/material of fake fingerprint representations.</description><subject>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpVj8FOwzAQRH3hgAofwAn_QMLGxonNraoaQKpEBb1Hm826WG0dcAKCv6ekXLjMHGY0mifEVQH5rTUGbjB9hc9cQaFygBLKcxGXEdt9iFtZH4XTWwpxlOvEA8cRx9BHOR9HpN1wJ2vc8b9ajW0KdGptmF5jeP_gQWLs5DNTv41hitacfJ8OGIkvxJnH_cCXfz4TL_Vys3jIVk_3j4v5KsOyKjNjQTutFFUFG-Ns6xWVpJUnzUAdFKidab2prNGVIrJOY6exMB6sc6Bn4vq0OvE2x7MHTN_NL3czcesfLG1Udg</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Kauba, Christof</creator><creator>Debiasi, Luca</creator><creator>Uhl, Andreas</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Enabling Fingerprint Presentation Attacks: Fake Fingerprint Fabrication Techniques and Recognition Performance</title><author>Kauba, Christof ; Debiasi, Luca ; Uhl, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a676-58039322c71e5598bf2c6c32fc3e0cd01a395bf5785372cc893ad3a15f089903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kauba, Christof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debiasi, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kauba, Christof</au><au>Debiasi, Luca</au><au>Uhl, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enabling Fingerprint Presentation Attacks: Fake Fingerprint Fabrication Techniques and Recognition Performance</atitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract>Fake fingerprint representation pose a severe threat for fingerprint based authentication systems. Despite advances in presentation attack detection technologies, which are often integrated directly into the fingerprint scanner devices, many fingerprint scanners are still susceptible to presentation attacks using physical fake fingerprint representation. In this work we evaluate five different commercial-off-the-shelf fingerprint scanners based on different sensing technologies, including optical, optical multispectral, passive capacitive, active capacitive and thermal regarding their susceptibility to presentation attacks using fake fingerprint representations. Several different materials to create the fake representation are tested and evaluated, including wax, cast, latex, silicone, different types of glue, window colours, modelling clay, etc. The quantitative evaluation includes assessing the fingerprint quality of the samples captured from the fake representations as well as comparison experiments where the achieved matching scores of the fake representations against the corresponding real fingerprints indicate the effectiveness of the fake representations. Our results confirmed that all except one of the tested devices are susceptible to at least one type/material of fake fingerprint representations.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2012.00606</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.00606
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2012_00606
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
title Enabling Fingerprint Presentation Attacks: Fake Fingerprint Fabrication Techniques and Recognition Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A42%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enabling%20Fingerprint%20Presentation%20Attacks:%20Fake%20Fingerprint%20Fabrication%20Techniques%20and%20Recognition%20Performance&rft.au=Kauba,%20Christof&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2012.00606&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2012_00606%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true