Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement
Public perceptions of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (RAI) are important in the acceptance, uptake, government regulation and research funding of this technology. Recent research has shown that the public's understanding of RAI can be negative or inaccurate. We believe effective public en...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2020-04 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | arXiv.org |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Robb, David A Ahmad, Muneeb I Tiseo, Carlo Aracri, Simona McConnell, Alistair C Page, Vincent Dondrup, Christian Chiyah Garcia, Francisco J Hai-Nguyen, Nguyen Pairet, Èric Paola Ardón Ramírez Semwal, Tushar Taylor, Hazel M Wilson, Lindsay J Lane, David Hastie, Helen Lohan, Katrin |
| description | Public perceptions of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (RAI) are important in the acceptance, uptake, government regulation and research funding of this technology. Recent research has shown that the public's understanding of RAI can be negative or inaccurate. We believe effective public engagement can help ensure that public opinion is better informed. In this paper, we describe our first iteration of a high throughput in-person public engagement activity. We describe the use of a light touch quiz-format survey instrument to integrate in-the-wild research participation into the engagement, allowing us to probe both the effectiveness of our engagement strategy, and public perceptions of the future roles of robots and humans working in dangerous settings, such as in the off-shore energy sector. We critique our methods and share interesting results into generational differences within the public's view of the future of Robotics and AI in hazardous environments. These findings include that older peoples' views about the future of robots in hazardous environments were not swayed by exposure to our exhibit, while the views of younger people were affected by our exhibit, leading us to consider carefully in future how to more effectively engage with and inform older people. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2004.00689 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2004_00689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2385861460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-4beff266566b29bc82ed29784a692a3a189b64c99128f5b035ce473fb415b0583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj11LwzAYhYMgOOZ-gFcGvG5N3nw08U5mnYOBQ3blTUlq2nV0SU1bmf_efXh1OPBwOA9Cd5SkXAlBHk08ND8pEMJTQqTSV2gCjNFEcYAbNOv7HSEEZAZCsAlafgQbhh43Hg9bh1-Mr13En8G7J5wfujbExtd4Pdq2KfHaxdJ1QxNOcAxjvcW5r03t9s4Pt-i6Mm3vZv85RZvXfDN_S1bvi-X8eZUYASTh1lUVSCmktKBtqcB9gc4UN1KDYYYqbSUvtaagKmEJE6XjGassp8cmFJui-8vs2bPoYrM38bc4-RZn3yPxcCG6GL5H1w_FLozRHz8VwJRQknJJ2B8HCFcy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2385861460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Robb, David A ; Ahmad, Muneeb I ; Tiseo, Carlo ; Aracri, Simona ; McConnell, Alistair C ; Page, Vincent ; Dondrup, Christian ; Chiyah Garcia, Francisco J ; Hai-Nguyen, Nguyen ; Pairet, Èric ; Paola Ardón Ramírez ; Semwal, Tushar ; Taylor, Hazel M ; Wilson, Lindsay J ; Lane, David ; Hastie, Helen ; Lohan, Katrin</creator><creatorcontrib>Robb, David A ; Ahmad, Muneeb I ; Tiseo, Carlo ; Aracri, Simona ; McConnell, Alistair C ; Page, Vincent ; Dondrup, Christian ; Chiyah Garcia, Francisco J ; Hai-Nguyen, Nguyen ; Pairet, Èric ; Paola Ardón Ramírez ; Semwal, Tushar ; Taylor, Hazel M ; Wilson, Lindsay J ; Lane, David ; Hastie, Helen ; Lohan, Katrin</creatorcontrib><description>Public perceptions of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (RAI) are important in the acceptance, uptake, government regulation and research funding of this technology. Recent research has shown that the public's understanding of RAI can be negative or inaccurate. We believe effective public engagement can help ensure that public opinion is better informed. In this paper, we describe our first iteration of a high throughput in-person public engagement activity. We describe the use of a light touch quiz-format survey instrument to integrate in-the-wild research participation into the engagement, allowing us to probe both the effectiveness of our engagement strategy, and public perceptions of the future roles of robots and humans working in dangerous settings, such as in the off-shore energy sector. We critique our methods and share interesting results into generational differences within the public's view of the future of Robotics and AI in hazardous environments. These findings include that older peoples' views about the future of robots in hazardous environments were not swayed by exposure to our exhibit, while the views of younger people were affected by our exhibit, leading us to consider carefully in future how to more effectively engage with and inform older people.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2004.00689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science - Computers and Society ; Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction ; Computer Science - Robotics ; Government regulations ; Hazardous areas ; Perceptions ; Public participation ; Robotics ; Robots</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2020-04</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.00689$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374789$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robb, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Muneeb I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiseo, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aracri, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Alistair C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dondrup, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiyah Garcia, Francisco J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hai-Nguyen, Nguyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pairet, Èric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paola Ardón Ramírez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semwal, Tushar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Hazel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Lindsay J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastie, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohan, Katrin</creatorcontrib><title>Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Public perceptions of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (RAI) are important in the acceptance, uptake, government regulation and research funding of this technology. Recent research has shown that the public's understanding of RAI can be negative or inaccurate. We believe effective public engagement can help ensure that public opinion is better informed. In this paper, we describe our first iteration of a high throughput in-person public engagement activity. We describe the use of a light touch quiz-format survey instrument to integrate in-the-wild research participation into the engagement, allowing us to probe both the effectiveness of our engagement strategy, and public perceptions of the future roles of robots and humans working in dangerous settings, such as in the off-shore energy sector. We critique our methods and share interesting results into generational differences within the public's view of the future of Robotics and AI in hazardous environments. These findings include that older peoples' views about the future of robots in hazardous environments were not swayed by exposure to our exhibit, while the views of younger people were affected by our exhibit, leading us to consider carefully in future how to more effectively engage with and inform older people.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science - Computers and Society</subject><subject>Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction</subject><subject>Computer Science - Robotics</subject><subject>Government regulations</subject><subject>Hazardous areas</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj11LwzAYhYMgOOZ-gFcGvG5N3nw08U5mnYOBQ3blTUlq2nV0SU1bmf_efXh1OPBwOA9Cd5SkXAlBHk08ND8pEMJTQqTSV2gCjNFEcYAbNOv7HSEEZAZCsAlafgQbhh43Hg9bh1-Mr13En8G7J5wfujbExtd4Pdq2KfHaxdJ1QxNOcAxjvcW5r03t9s4Pt-i6Mm3vZv85RZvXfDN_S1bvi-X8eZUYASTh1lUVSCmktKBtqcB9gc4UN1KDYYYqbSUvtaagKmEJE6XjGassp8cmFJui-8vs2bPoYrM38bc4-RZn3yPxcCG6GL5H1w_FLozRHz8VwJRQknJJ2B8HCFcy</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Robb, David A</creator><creator>Ahmad, Muneeb I</creator><creator>Tiseo, Carlo</creator><creator>Aracri, Simona</creator><creator>McConnell, Alistair C</creator><creator>Page, Vincent</creator><creator>Dondrup, Christian</creator><creator>Chiyah Garcia, Francisco J</creator><creator>Hai-Nguyen, Nguyen</creator><creator>Pairet, Èric</creator><creator>Paola Ardón Ramírez</creator><creator>Semwal, Tushar</creator><creator>Taylor, Hazel M</creator><creator>Wilson, Lindsay J</creator><creator>Lane, David</creator><creator>Hastie, Helen</creator><creator>Lohan, Katrin</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement</title><author>Robb, David A ; Ahmad, Muneeb I ; Tiseo, Carlo ; Aracri, Simona ; McConnell, Alistair C ; Page, Vincent ; Dondrup, Christian ; Chiyah Garcia, Francisco J ; Hai-Nguyen, Nguyen ; Pairet, Èric ; Paola Ardón Ramírez ; Semwal, Tushar ; Taylor, Hazel M ; Wilson, Lindsay J ; Lane, David ; Hastie, Helen ; Lohan, Katrin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-4beff266566b29bc82ed29784a692a3a189b64c99128f5b035ce473fb415b0583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science - Computers and Society</topic><topic>Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction</topic><topic>Computer Science - Robotics</topic><topic>Government regulations</topic><topic>Hazardous areas</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robb, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Muneeb I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiseo, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aracri, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Alistair C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dondrup, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiyah Garcia, Francisco J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hai-Nguyen, Nguyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pairet, Èric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paola Ardón Ramírez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semwal, Tushar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Hazel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Lindsay J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastie, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohan, Katrin</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robb, David A</au><au>Ahmad, Muneeb I</au><au>Tiseo, Carlo</au><au>Aracri, Simona</au><au>McConnell, Alistair C</au><au>Page, Vincent</au><au>Dondrup, Christian</au><au>Chiyah Garcia, Francisco J</au><au>Hai-Nguyen, Nguyen</au><au>Pairet, Èric</au><au>Paola Ardón Ramírez</au><au>Semwal, Tushar</au><au>Taylor, Hazel M</au><au>Wilson, Lindsay J</au><au>Lane, David</au><au>Hastie, Helen</au><au>Lohan, Katrin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Public perceptions of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (RAI) are important in the acceptance, uptake, government regulation and research funding of this technology. Recent research has shown that the public's understanding of RAI can be negative or inaccurate. We believe effective public engagement can help ensure that public opinion is better informed. In this paper, we describe our first iteration of a high throughput in-person public engagement activity. We describe the use of a light touch quiz-format survey instrument to integrate in-the-wild research participation into the engagement, allowing us to probe both the effectiveness of our engagement strategy, and public perceptions of the future roles of robots and humans working in dangerous settings, such as in the off-shore energy sector. We critique our methods and share interesting results into generational differences within the public's view of the future of Robotics and AI in hazardous environments. These findings include that older peoples' views about the future of robots in hazardous environments were not swayed by exposure to our exhibit, while the views of younger people were affected by our exhibit, leading us to consider carefully in future how to more effectively engage with and inform older people.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2004.00689</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
| ispartof | arXiv.org, 2020-04 |
| issn | 2331-8422 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_2004_00689 |
| source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
| subjects | Artificial intelligence Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence Computer Science - Computers and Society Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction Computer Science - Robotics Government regulations Hazardous areas Perceptions Public participation Robotics Robots |
| title | Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A24%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robots%20in%20the%20Danger%20Zone:%20Exploring%20Public%20Perception%20through%20Engagement&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Robb,%20David%20A&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2004.00689&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2385861460%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2385861460&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |