Dynamic Dark Energy Equation of State (EoS) and Hubble Constant analysis using type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset
This paper constraints dynamic dark energy equation of state (EoS) parameters using the type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset. The paper also discusses the dependency of dynamic dark energy EoS parameters on the chosen or assumed value of the Hubble Constant. To understand the correlation betwee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2020-09 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | ur Rahman, Syed Faisal |
description | This paper constraints dynamic dark energy equation of state (EoS) parameters using the type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset. The paper also discusses the dependency of dynamic dark energy EoS parameters on the chosen or assumed value of the Hubble Constant. To understand the correlation between the Hubble Constant values and measured dynamic dark energy EoS parameters, we used recent surveys being done through various techniques such as cosmic microwave background studies, gravitational waves, baryonic acoustic oscillations and standard candles to set values for different Hubble Constant values as fixed parameters with CPL and WCDM models. Then we applied trust region reflective (TRF) and dog leg (dogbox) algorithms to fit dark energy density parameter and dynamic dark energy EoS parameters. We found a significant negative correlation between the fixed Hubble Constant parameter and measured EoS parameter, w0. Then we used two best fit Hubble Constant values (70 and 69.18474) km \(s^{-1}\) \(Mpc^{-1}\) based on Chi-square test to test more dark energy EoS parameters like: JBP, BA, PADE-I, PADE-II, and LH4 models and compared the results with \(\Lambda\)-CDM with constant \(w_{de}\)=-1, WCDM and CPL models. We conclude that flat \(\Lambda\)-CDM and WCDM models clearly provide best results while using the BIC criteria as it severely penalizes the use of extra parameters. However, the dependency of EoS parameters on Hubble Constant value and the increasing tension in the measurement of Hubble Constant values using different techniques warrants further investigation into looking for optimal dynamic dark energy EoS models to optimally model the relation between the expansion rate and evolution of dark energy in our universe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.1907.02305 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1907_02305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2252542045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a525-f2d884a93510e9fc3438cb7da5576994692cd9203a1d3ad724e8f6cd7a0902643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM9rwjAcxcNgMHH-ATstsMt2aJfmR9sch3ZTEHbQncvXJpU6TWqSiv3vV3WnB4_H470PQk8JiXkuBHkHd25OcSJJFhPKiLhDI8pYEuWc0gc08X5HCKFpRoVgI3Se9QYOTYVn4H5xYbTb9rg4dhAaa7Ct8SpA0Pi1sKs3DEbhebfZ7DWeWuMDmDB4sO9943HnG7PFoW81XgD2XaudsSfQuHb2gH_MpY_GCVYQwOvwiO5r2Hs9-dcxWn8W6-k8Wn5_LaYfywgEFVFNVZ5zkEwkRMu6Ypzl1SZTIESWSslTSSslKWGQKAYqo1zndVqpDIgcTnI2Rs-32iuWsnXNAVxfXvCUVzxD4uWWaJ09dtqHcmc7N7zyJaXDBk4JF-wPRWFm9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2252542045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Dark Energy Equation of State (EoS) and Hubble Constant analysis using type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>ur Rahman, Syed Faisal</creator><creatorcontrib>ur Rahman, Syed Faisal</creatorcontrib><description>This paper constraints dynamic dark energy equation of state (EoS) parameters using the type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset. The paper also discusses the dependency of dynamic dark energy EoS parameters on the chosen or assumed value of the Hubble Constant. To understand the correlation between the Hubble Constant values and measured dynamic dark energy EoS parameters, we used recent surveys being done through various techniques such as cosmic microwave background studies, gravitational waves, baryonic acoustic oscillations and standard candles to set values for different Hubble Constant values as fixed parameters with CPL and WCDM models. Then we applied trust region reflective (TRF) and dog leg (dogbox) algorithms to fit dark energy density parameter and dynamic dark energy EoS parameters. We found a significant negative correlation between the fixed Hubble Constant parameter and measured EoS parameter, w0. Then we used two best fit Hubble Constant values (70 and 69.18474) km \(s^{-1}\) \(Mpc^{-1}\) based on Chi-square test to test more dark energy EoS parameters like: JBP, BA, PADE-I, PADE-II, and LH4 models and compared the results with \(\Lambda\)-CDM with constant \(w_{de}\)=-1, WCDM and CPL models. We conclude that flat \(\Lambda\)-CDM and WCDM models clearly provide best results while using the BIC criteria as it severely penalizes the use of extra parameters. However, the dependency of EoS parameters on Hubble Constant value and the increasing tension in the measurement of Hubble Constant values using different techniques warrants further investigation into looking for optimal dynamic dark energy EoS models to optimally model the relation between the expansion rate and evolution of dark energy in our universe.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1907.02305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Big Bang theory ; Cosmic microwave background ; Dark energy ; Datasets ; Dependence ; Energy measurement ; Equations of state ; Expanding universe theory ; Flux density ; Gravitational waves ; Hubble constant ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; Parameters ; Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics ; Statistical tests ; Supernovae ; Universe</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2020-09</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.02305$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772920040046$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ur Rahman, Syed Faisal</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Dark Energy Equation of State (EoS) and Hubble Constant analysis using type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>This paper constraints dynamic dark energy equation of state (EoS) parameters using the type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset. The paper also discusses the dependency of dynamic dark energy EoS parameters on the chosen or assumed value of the Hubble Constant. To understand the correlation between the Hubble Constant values and measured dynamic dark energy EoS parameters, we used recent surveys being done through various techniques such as cosmic microwave background studies, gravitational waves, baryonic acoustic oscillations and standard candles to set values for different Hubble Constant values as fixed parameters with CPL and WCDM models. Then we applied trust region reflective (TRF) and dog leg (dogbox) algorithms to fit dark energy density parameter and dynamic dark energy EoS parameters. We found a significant negative correlation between the fixed Hubble Constant parameter and measured EoS parameter, w0. Then we used two best fit Hubble Constant values (70 and 69.18474) km \(s^{-1}\) \(Mpc^{-1}\) based on Chi-square test to test more dark energy EoS parameters like: JBP, BA, PADE-I, PADE-II, and LH4 models and compared the results with \(\Lambda\)-CDM with constant \(w_{de}\)=-1, WCDM and CPL models. We conclude that flat \(\Lambda\)-CDM and WCDM models clearly provide best results while using the BIC criteria as it severely penalizes the use of extra parameters. However, the dependency of EoS parameters on Hubble Constant value and the increasing tension in the measurement of Hubble Constant values using different techniques warrants further investigation into looking for optimal dynamic dark energy EoS models to optimally model the relation between the expansion rate and evolution of dark energy in our universe.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Big Bang theory</subject><subject>Cosmic microwave background</subject><subject>Dark energy</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Energy measurement</subject><subject>Equations of state</subject><subject>Expanding universe theory</subject><subject>Flux density</subject><subject>Gravitational waves</subject><subject>Hubble constant</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Supernovae</subject><subject>Universe</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkM9rwjAcxcNgMHH-ATstsMt2aJfmR9sch3ZTEHbQncvXJpU6TWqSiv3vV3WnB4_H470PQk8JiXkuBHkHd25OcSJJFhPKiLhDI8pYEuWc0gc08X5HCKFpRoVgI3Se9QYOTYVn4H5xYbTb9rg4dhAaa7Ct8SpA0Pi1sKs3DEbhebfZ7DWeWuMDmDB4sO9943HnG7PFoW81XgD2XaudsSfQuHb2gH_MpY_GCVYQwOvwiO5r2Hs9-dcxWn8W6-k8Wn5_LaYfywgEFVFNVZ5zkEwkRMu6Ypzl1SZTIESWSslTSSslKWGQKAYqo1zndVqpDIgcTnI2Rs-32iuWsnXNAVxfXvCUVzxD4uWWaJ09dtqHcmc7N7zyJaXDBk4JF-wPRWFm9g</recordid><startdate>20200929</startdate><enddate>20200929</enddate><creator>ur Rahman, Syed Faisal</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200929</creationdate><title>Dynamic Dark Energy Equation of State (EoS) and Hubble Constant analysis using type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset</title><author>ur Rahman, Syed Faisal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a525-f2d884a93510e9fc3438cb7da5576994692cd9203a1d3ad724e8f6cd7a0902643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Big Bang theory</topic><topic>Cosmic microwave background</topic><topic>Dark energy</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Energy measurement</topic><topic>Equations of state</topic><topic>Expanding universe theory</topic><topic>Flux density</topic><topic>Gravitational waves</topic><topic>Hubble constant</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Supernovae</topic><topic>Universe</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ur Rahman, Syed Faisal</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ur Rahman, Syed Faisal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Dark Energy Equation of State (EoS) and Hubble Constant analysis using type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2020-09-29</date><risdate>2020</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>This paper constraints dynamic dark energy equation of state (EoS) parameters using the type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset. The paper also discusses the dependency of dynamic dark energy EoS parameters on the chosen or assumed value of the Hubble Constant. To understand the correlation between the Hubble Constant values and measured dynamic dark energy EoS parameters, we used recent surveys being done through various techniques such as cosmic microwave background studies, gravitational waves, baryonic acoustic oscillations and standard candles to set values for different Hubble Constant values as fixed parameters with CPL and WCDM models. Then we applied trust region reflective (TRF) and dog leg (dogbox) algorithms to fit dark energy density parameter and dynamic dark energy EoS parameters. We found a significant negative correlation between the fixed Hubble Constant parameter and measured EoS parameter, w0. Then we used two best fit Hubble Constant values (70 and 69.18474) km \(s^{-1}\) \(Mpc^{-1}\) based on Chi-square test to test more dark energy EoS parameters like: JBP, BA, PADE-I, PADE-II, and LH4 models and compared the results with \(\Lambda\)-CDM with constant \(w_{de}\)=-1, WCDM and CPL models. We conclude that flat \(\Lambda\)-CDM and WCDM models clearly provide best results while using the BIC criteria as it severely penalizes the use of extra parameters. However, the dependency of EoS parameters on Hubble Constant value and the increasing tension in the measurement of Hubble Constant values using different techniques warrants further investigation into looking for optimal dynamic dark energy EoS models to optimally model the relation between the expansion rate and evolution of dark energy in our universe.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1907.02305</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2020-09 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_1907_02305 |
source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Big Bang theory Cosmic microwave background Dark energy Datasets Dependence Energy measurement Equations of state Expanding universe theory Flux density Gravitational waves Hubble constant Mathematical models Optimization Parameters Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics Statistical tests Supernovae Universe |
title | Dynamic Dark Energy Equation of State (EoS) and Hubble Constant analysis using type Ia supernovae from Union 2.1 dataset |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A28%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Dark%20Energy%20Equation%20of%20State%20(EoS)%20and%20Hubble%20Constant%20analysis%20using%20type%20Ia%20supernovae%20from%20Union%202.1%20dataset&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=ur%20Rahman,%20Syed%20Faisal&rft.date=2020-09-29&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1907.02305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2252542045%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2252542045&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |