Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics

When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2020-02
Hauptverfasser: Kannengießer, Niclas, Lins, Sebastian, Dehling, Tobias, Sunyaev, Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Kannengießer, Niclas
Lins, Sebastian
Dehling, Tobias
Sunyaev, Ali
description When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characteristics and identify trade-offs between them. Furthermore, we assess how DLT designs account for these trade-offs and we develop archetypes for DLT designs that cater to specific quality requirements. The main purpose of our article is to introduce scientific and practical audiences to the intricacies of DLT designs and to support development of viable applications on DLT.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1906.00861
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1906_00861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2234823397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527-2ca1f8ee1b4afe937a83190fb9e5ae5f32cbca413eb03fee19a9086b3cd8e8513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAURC0kJKrSD2CFJdYpfsSNww4VKEiFbrKPrp3rJlVJgp0A_fualtVsjkZzhpAbzuapVordg_9tvuc8Z4s5Y3rBL8hESMkTnQpxRWYh7BhjYpEJpeSEfLw3bUWHGukK-gdaeKgw2TgXqMHhB7GlT00YfGPGASu6xmqLnhZo67bbd9sDXdbgwQ7oI9XYcE0uHewDzv5zSoqX52L5mqw3q7fl4zoBJbJEWOBOI3KTgsNcZqBlHOxMjgpQOSmssZByiYZJF7kc8qhipK00asXllNyea0-yZe-bT_CH8k-6PElH4u5M9L77GjEM5a4bfRs3lULIVMdL8kweAZSXWpI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2234823397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Kannengießer, Niclas ; Lins, Sebastian ; Dehling, Tobias ; Sunyaev, Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Kannengießer, Niclas ; Lins, Sebastian ; Dehling, Tobias ; Sunyaev, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characteristics and identify trade-offs between them. Furthermore, we assess how DLT designs account for these trade-offs and we develop archetypes for DLT designs that cater to specific quality requirements. The main purpose of our article is to introduce scientific and practical audiences to the intricacies of DLT designs and to support development of viable applications on DLT.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1906.00861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security ; Computer Science - Software Engineering ; Tradeoffs ; Viability</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2020-02</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.00861$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3379463$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kannengießer, Niclas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lins, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehling, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunyaev, Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characteristics and identify trade-offs between them. Furthermore, we assess how DLT designs account for these trade-offs and we develop archetypes for DLT designs that cater to specific quality requirements. The main purpose of our article is to introduce scientific and practical audiences to the intricacies of DLT designs and to support development of viable applications on DLT.</description><subject>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security</subject><subject>Computer Science - Software Engineering</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAURC0kJKrSD2CFJdYpfsSNww4VKEiFbrKPrp3rJlVJgp0A_fualtVsjkZzhpAbzuapVordg_9tvuc8Z4s5Y3rBL8hESMkTnQpxRWYh7BhjYpEJpeSEfLw3bUWHGukK-gdaeKgw2TgXqMHhB7GlT00YfGPGASu6xmqLnhZo67bbd9sDXdbgwQ7oI9XYcE0uHewDzv5zSoqX52L5mqw3q7fl4zoBJbJEWOBOI3KTgsNcZqBlHOxMjgpQOSmssZByiYZJF7kc8qhipK00asXllNyea0-yZe-bT_CH8k-6PElH4u5M9L77GjEM5a4bfRs3lULIVMdL8kweAZSXWpI</recordid><startdate>20200204</startdate><enddate>20200204</enddate><creator>Kannengießer, Niclas</creator><creator>Lins, Sebastian</creator><creator>Dehling, Tobias</creator><creator>Sunyaev, Ali</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200204</creationdate><title>Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics</title><author>Kannengießer, Niclas ; Lins, Sebastian ; Dehling, Tobias ; Sunyaev, Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a527-2ca1f8ee1b4afe937a83190fb9e5ae5f32cbca413eb03fee19a9086b3cd8e8513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security</topic><topic>Computer Science - Software Engineering</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kannengießer, Niclas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lins, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehling, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunyaev, Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kannengießer, Niclas</au><au>Lins, Sebastian</au><au>Dehling, Tobias</au><au>Sunyaev, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2020-02-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characteristics and identify trade-offs between them. Furthermore, we assess how DLT designs account for these trade-offs and we develop archetypes for DLT designs that cater to specific quality requirements. The main purpose of our article is to introduce scientific and practical audiences to the intricacies of DLT designs and to support development of viable applications on DLT.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1906.00861</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2020-02
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1906_00861
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Computer Science - Cryptography and Security
Computer Science - Software Engineering
Tradeoffs
Viability
title Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A07%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mind%20the%20Gap:%20Trade-Offs%20between%20Distributed%20Ledger%20Technology%20Characteristics&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Kannengie%C3%9Fer,%20Niclas&rft.date=2020-02-04&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1906.00861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2234823397%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2234823397&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true