Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics
When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2020-02 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Kannengießer, Niclas Lins, Sebastian Dehling, Tobias Sunyaev, Ali |
description | When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characteristics and identify trade-offs between them. Furthermore, we assess how DLT designs account for these trade-offs and we develop archetypes for DLT designs that cater to specific quality requirements. The main purpose of our article is to introduce scientific and practical audiences to the intricacies of DLT designs and to support development of viable applications on DLT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.1906.00861 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1906_00861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2234823397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527-2ca1f8ee1b4afe937a83190fb9e5ae5f32cbca413eb03fee19a9086b3cd8e8513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAURC0kJKrSD2CFJdYpfsSNww4VKEiFbrKPrp3rJlVJgp0A_fualtVsjkZzhpAbzuapVordg_9tvuc8Z4s5Y3rBL8hESMkTnQpxRWYh7BhjYpEJpeSEfLw3bUWHGukK-gdaeKgw2TgXqMHhB7GlT00YfGPGASu6xmqLnhZo67bbd9sDXdbgwQ7oI9XYcE0uHewDzv5zSoqX52L5mqw3q7fl4zoBJbJEWOBOI3KTgsNcZqBlHOxMjgpQOSmssZByiYZJF7kc8qhipK00asXllNyea0-yZe-bT_CH8k-6PElH4u5M9L77GjEM5a4bfRs3lULIVMdL8kweAZSXWpI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2234823397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Kannengießer, Niclas ; Lins, Sebastian ; Dehling, Tobias ; Sunyaev, Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Kannengießer, Niclas ; Lins, Sebastian ; Dehling, Tobias ; Sunyaev, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characteristics and identify trade-offs between them. Furthermore, we assess how DLT designs account for these trade-offs and we develop archetypes for DLT designs that cater to specific quality requirements. The main purpose of our article is to introduce scientific and practical audiences to the intricacies of DLT designs and to support development of viable applications on DLT.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1906.00861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security ; Computer Science - Software Engineering ; Tradeoffs ; Viability</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2020-02</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.00861$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3379463$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kannengießer, Niclas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lins, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehling, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunyaev, Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characteristics and identify trade-offs between them. Furthermore, we assess how DLT designs account for these trade-offs and we develop archetypes for DLT designs that cater to specific quality requirements. The main purpose of our article is to introduce scientific and practical audiences to the intricacies of DLT designs and to support development of viable applications on DLT.</description><subject>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security</subject><subject>Computer Science - Software Engineering</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAURC0kJKrSD2CFJdYpfsSNww4VKEiFbrKPrp3rJlVJgp0A_fualtVsjkZzhpAbzuapVordg_9tvuc8Z4s5Y3rBL8hESMkTnQpxRWYh7BhjYpEJpeSEfLw3bUWHGukK-gdaeKgw2TgXqMHhB7GlT00YfGPGASu6xmqLnhZo67bbd9sDXdbgwQ7oI9XYcE0uHewDzv5zSoqX52L5mqw3q7fl4zoBJbJEWOBOI3KTgsNcZqBlHOxMjgpQOSmssZByiYZJF7kc8qhipK00asXllNyea0-yZe-bT_CH8k-6PElH4u5M9L77GjEM5a4bfRs3lULIVMdL8kweAZSXWpI</recordid><startdate>20200204</startdate><enddate>20200204</enddate><creator>Kannengießer, Niclas</creator><creator>Lins, Sebastian</creator><creator>Dehling, Tobias</creator><creator>Sunyaev, Ali</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200204</creationdate><title>Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics</title><author>Kannengießer, Niclas ; Lins, Sebastian ; Dehling, Tobias ; Sunyaev, Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a527-2ca1f8ee1b4afe937a83190fb9e5ae5f32cbca413eb03fee19a9086b3cd8e8513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Cryptography and Security</topic><topic>Computer Science - Software Engineering</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kannengießer, Niclas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lins, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehling, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunyaev, Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kannengießer, Niclas</au><au>Lins, Sebastian</au><au>Dehling, Tobias</au><au>Sunyaev, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2020-02-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characteristics and identify trade-offs between them. Furthermore, we assess how DLT designs account for these trade-offs and we develop archetypes for DLT designs that cater to specific quality requirements. The main purpose of our article is to introduce scientific and practical audiences to the intricacies of DLT designs and to support development of viable applications on DLT.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1906.00861</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2020-02 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_1906_00861 |
source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Computer Science - Cryptography and Security Computer Science - Software Engineering Tradeoffs Viability |
title | Mind the Gap: Trade-Offs between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A07%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mind%20the%20Gap:%20Trade-Offs%20between%20Distributed%20Ledger%20Technology%20Characteristics&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Kannengie%C3%9Fer,%20Niclas&rft.date=2020-02-04&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1906.00861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2234823397%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2234823397&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |